Thermo1223 Joined Apr 18, 2005 Messages 3,446 Location Easton, PA Feb 15, 2023 #62 0W-16 said: No liability if the owner said put it back as is and was explained the risk of not replacing it. You're assuming a whole lot in your claim. Click to expand... Owners can and most likely are wrong in their line of thinking when it comes to cars. Rays channel was a prime example of that.
0W-16 said: No liability if the owner said put it back as is and was explained the risk of not replacing it. You're assuming a whole lot in your claim. Click to expand... Owners can and most likely are wrong in their line of thinking when it comes to cars. Rays channel was a prime example of that.
Thermo1223 Joined Apr 18, 2005 Messages 3,446 Location Easton, PA Feb 15, 2023 #63 The Critic said: Why would you? IIRC it was a re-ring job, not a full overhaul. If the job was being done under warranty, they would only replace the pistons/rings and associated gaskets. Click to expand... That's because warranty work is always the lowest common denominator. Spending your own money is a bit different. My opinion though...not gospel.
The Critic said: Why would you? IIRC it was a re-ring job, not a full overhaul. If the job was being done under warranty, they would only replace the pistons/rings and associated gaskets. Click to expand... That's because warranty work is always the lowest common denominator. Spending your own money is a bit different. My opinion though...not gospel.