Wrangler getting a minivan engine?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
9,460
Location
Not Seattle, but close.
I was told today that the new Wranglers will have Chrysler's 3.8 litre V-6. Is this true?
What next, are they going to come out with a new color, maybe pink?
Why don't they spend some money and come up with a new Inline six?
mad.gif
mad.gif
mad.gif


( and why isn't there a graemlin for vomit?)
 
Don't sell that engine short. IMO, it is the most advanced push rod engine made today. It was the basis for 2 OHC versions, before the current crop of sludge motors. For the job it does pushing heavy minivans around, I think it is the best fit for the job.
 
What's wrong with that, at least there dependable. I think the 4.0's where perfect though.
 
Not so much that there's really anything wrong with the 3.8, I just hate knowing that there will no longer be an inline six, or a "Jeep" only engine.
 
The 4.0 was going to be phased out sooner or later, the Wrangler was the last vehicle to use it. It dates back well into the AMC days. The real surprise is that it didn't get the 3.7. I thought maybe it was too wide, but I keep hearing about a V8 version.

Don't worry, the real spit in the traditionalist's face is coming soon: The four door.
pat.gif


Is the 3.8 that advanced? Didn't it still have a distributor until recently?

-T
 
Last news I heard is the 3.8 is a temporary thing till a new engine comes out. I am glad it is not the 3.7 though.
I also will miss the 4.0. It was just getting to be to old of a design and not able to meet newer emission standards. I still think they should do something like GM's 4.2 I6, but with a little lower torque band.
 
by then it will have given them time to tack on all kinds of ancillary and unnecessary mandatory options in the form of "packages" to make it a real dumb thing to buy. That's what they did with the Liberty.

You won't be able to buy a diesel SE or stripped down model. It will cost more then the Rubicon ...or will only be offered in the Sahara line.

Trust me. Detroit don't do diesel (in spite of Detroit Diesel).
 
Is the 3.8 that advanced? Didn't it still have a distributor until recently?

Nope. It is the 2nd. mopar distributorless engine. the 1st. was the Dodge Spirit R/T 2.2 DOHC engine.
It has all the features of the latest mopar engines, except it is an iron block with pushrods.
It really is a nice compact engine. Has a great torque curve and is quick to rev. Very smooth and quiet.
 
Are you sure KRN? That 2.4 sure looks like it has weiner in it's basic DNA. Why would Diamler-Chrysler go to an asian engineered engine?? I know that the jeep line has used some asian transmissions ..but the 2.4 is used throughout the DC line up.
confused.gif


Looks like I'm wrong too
frown.gif
..or maybe a few German engineers moved to Mexico
dunno.gif


The 2.4 entered production in December 1994 for minivans and cloud cars with the four speed automatic transmission. In 2002, it was titled "PowerTech" in the Jeep Cherokee. It is due to be slowly replaced by the 2.4 liter World Engine.
The 2.4 liter turbo engine

(from "Mr. Source"): A turbo model was introduced to the world in 2002 for use in 2003 models. Designed and built in Mexico, refined by Americans (who changed some cooling, reduced boost, and adjusted the PCM), the 2.4 can be tweaked to increase power but was restricted in Mexican vehicles to lower insurance costs. the 2.4 Turbo engine, is Mexican, build in Mexico, engineered by Mexicans and refined by Americans and Germans. They changed some of the cooling, reduced boost, and a different set-up for the PCM. Making some "tweaks" you can gain easly about 10 or 15 % increase in HP. DC restricted it because of insurance. Many of the lessons learned with Super Touring Stratus (Racing Car), were applied to the engine.

The 2.4 turbo in the Neon SRT-4 (0-60 in 6 seconds, stock!) produces 215-235 horsepower and 245 lb-ft of torque. The same engine is used in the PT Cruiser GT. It was superceded by a 2.4-turbo World Engine with 300 hp. http://www.allpar.com/mopar/24.html

Here's what they say about the 3.8

Chrysler, Dodge, and Plymouth 3.3, 3.5, 3.8 Liter V-6 Engines
by Michael A. Cole except where noted

3.5 liter V6Introduced in 1990, the 3.3L was the first Mopar designed and built V6 engine to see duty in front wheel drive Chrysler vehicles. [A 3.9 liter engine, based on the LA series V8s, was the first Chrysler made V6, but it only saw truck duty.] The 3.3 was even successful as a racing engine (as used in Shelby Can Am cars)

Joined by a 3.8L version the following year, the 3.3/3.8L series features a traditional cast-iron block, aluminum head, overhead-valve design while also incorporating newer technologies such as sequential, multiple-port fuel injection (SMPI) and an integrated electronic ignition system supplanting the mechanical distributor, rotor and coil systems of the past.

Also in the 3.3/3.8L series, a 3.5L aluminum-block version saw early duty in the LH platform series. It was later replaced by an all-aluminum 24-valve 3.2L V6 featuring a unique (at the time) coil-over-plug design which eliminated the need for secondary ignition cables. The 3.2 itself was dropped, leaving the 2.7 and 3.5.

With ample torque available early in the rpm range, the 3.3/3.8L series was well suited to its primary application as a source of power for Chrysler's award winning minivans. These engines were also used in the Dynasty, New Yorker, Fifth Avenue and Imperial models until those vehicles were later replaced by the LH platform series, which was eventually powered by the aforementioned all-aluminum 2.7/3.2L V6s.
 
DC did work on some engines with Mitsubish and Hyundai. I believe the DOHC 3.8L engines are the joint effort, but the iron block, aluminum head pushrod 3.8 (and it's sister the 3.3) are not used by anyone but DC.
 
The 3.3L and 3.8L V6's have good reputations for reliability and longevity. My minivans 3.3L is at 140K miles, original everything, even the plugs and wires. It will go 200K miles easy, just getting broken in. My goal is 250K miles on the engine and transmission with no major work, other than maintenance. Then I'll get something newer, but keep the van and run it till it falls apart.

There is nothing wrong with pushrods. It's just a mechanism to make the valves go up and down, and they work fine for all but high revving engines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom