World’s 1st vertical takeoff and landing aircraft

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
19,528
Location
Lake Forest, CA
for personal use.

Quote:
“Our goal is to develop an aircraft for use in everyday life,” explains Daniel Wiegand, CEO and one of the company’s four founders.

“We are going for a plane that can take off and land vertically and does not need the complex and expensive infrastructure of an airport.

“To reduce noise and pollution, we are using electric engines so it can also be used close to urban areas.”

Founded in February 2015 by four engineers and doctoral students from the Technical University of Munich in Germany, Lilium has already proved the concept with several scale, 25 kg prototypes and is now developing its first ultralight vertical takeoff and landing aircraft.


Quote:
The Lilium vehicle combines the benefits of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft while avoiding their drawbacks. While initially restricted to airfields, the goal is for it to take off vertically from almost anywhere – even from back gardens – it needs only an open flat area of about 15x15 m.

Although taking off and landing like a helicopter, by swiveling its engines it also functions as a very efficient aircraft that can travel at up to 400 km/h.

Entirely electric, the plane is much quieter during takeoff than helicopters thanks to its ducted fan engines. Its batteries, engines and controllers are redundant, making it a much safer design than conventional helicopters.

The plane is classed as a Light Sport Aircraft for two occupants, with the pilot’s license requiring 20 hours’ minimum training – almost like taking a driving license.




Lilium_aircraft_takes_off_from_a_city_node_full_image_2.jpg



Ducted_fans_on_wings_large.jpg
 
Eh?

Um..helicopters?
Um...Harrier?

Thats without getting historical, which I'm sure would turn up some early 20th century contenders.

IOW your title is plainly bollocks.
 
Originally Posted By: Ducked
Eh?

Um..helicopters?
Um...Harrier?

Thats without getting historical, which I'm sure would turn up some early 20th century contenders.

IOW your title is plainly bollocks.


His title was clarified by "for personal use"...

But it's still nowhere near the first idea for a personal VTOL airplane.

If it actually flies...well...then it will be a first...
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14
Originally Posted By: Shannow
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-08/ca...balloon/6604580


An imitator 33 years behind the original man in a lawn chair with balloons...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Walters


I was going to post the same link. I remember that event. I was in my mid 20s, this guy and his balloons was all over the news. I remember my father found the event near hysterical, he went on about it for days.

I wonder about the use of small fans in the plane featured by the OP. In my experience, as the fan size shrinks, the air flow drops considerably. I'd say the air flow follows Pi R squared (area swept by the fan blades).
 
Eybeballing it, it doesn't look like it would glide very well in the case of power failure. At least a rotary-winged aircraft can auto-rotate to a safe landing.
 
Humans can't even get 2D personal transport right.

3D is way out of the question under individual control, and is never ever going to happen.

Unless it's fully automated, then it's the mechanical equivalent of teleporting.
 
Originally Posted By: weasley
Eybeballing it, it doesn't look like it would glide very well in the case of power failure. At least a rotary-winged aircraft can auto-rotate to a safe landing.


I wonder about how it can be kept from pitching down in the event of power failure. That round pod up front is not an airfoil shape. If the motors in that pod stop running, there is no pitch control.

Orville and Wilbur must be spinning in their graves. This thing would be very inefficient in how it achieves 3 axis control. No ailerons, elevator or vertical tail. Every flying maneuver would have to be achieved by differential thrust or thrust vectoring, which is very inefficient in its use of the stored onboard energy.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: A_Harman
They want to power it with electricity? It wouldn't even be able to lift its battery pack, much less a payload.


Yup this
 
If I had a dollar for every "flying car", "personal airplane", "technological revolution in air transport" or the like that has graced the cover of "Popular Science" or "Popular Mechanics" over my lifetime, I could practically retire...

The ideas keep popping up, but none of them ever reach even prototype phase...and after 50+ years of being promised a revolution in personal transportation, I'm becoming quite the skeptic...
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14
What should be called a paper airplane...

No prototype. No actual airplane. Just another idea with a cool drawing.

The Moeller "Sky Car" has been on the drawing boards for at least 30 years now. Lots of cool pictures.

No successful flights.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moller_M400_Skycar


When I was a cub engineer at John Deere Rotary Engine Div. in the late 80's, I worked with the engineer that developed Moller's wankel engines. Mike Griffith had been a long-time wankel true-believer. He started out working for Curtiss-Wright in the late 60's, then went to OMC and worked on their outboard wankels, including their 4-rotor race engines, which dominated the outboard racing scene in the mid-70's. He went to work for John Deere Rotary when they bought the North American rights from Curtiss-Wright, then left to work on the Moller Aircar I think in '87 or '88. The engines in the Aircar are derived from the OMC wankels.
 
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
for personal use.

Quote:
“Our goal is to develop an aircraft for use in everyday life,” explains Daniel Wiegand, CEO and one of the company’s four founders.

“We are going for a plane that can take off and land vertically and does not need the complex and expensive infrastructure of an airport.

“To reduce noise and pollution, we are using electric engines so it can also be used close to urban areas.”

Founded in February 2015 by four engineers and doctoral students from the Technical University of Munich in Germany, Lilium has already proved the concept with several scale, 25 kg prototypes and is now developing its first ultralight vertical takeoff and landing aircraft.


Quote:
The Lilium vehicle combines the benefits of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft while avoiding their drawbacks. While initially restricted to airfields, the goal is for it to take off vertically from almost anywhere – even from back gardens – it needs only an open flat area of about 15x15 m.

Although taking off and landing like a helicopter, by swiveling its engines it also functions as a very efficient aircraft that can travel at up to 400 km/h.

Entirely electric, the plane is much quieter during takeoff than helicopters thanks to its ducted fan engines. Its batteries, engines and controllers are redundant, making it a much safer design than conventional helicopters.

The plane is classed as a Light Sport Aircraft for two occupants, with the pilot’s license requiring 20 hours’ minimum training – almost like taking a driving license.




Lilium_aircraft_takes_off_from_a_city_node_full_image_2.jpg



Ducted_fans_on_wings_large.jpg

Clickbait heading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom