WORLD CUP 2026 THREAD

for a sport which many don't give a rat's behind about.
In KC ? Maybe so.... Otherwise, take a wild guess at what is the most popular sport in the world. Last WC final games was watched by over a billion people worldwide.
FIFA mandates the removal or covering of all non-official sponsor logos, gambling branding, and naming-rights sponsorships inside host stadiums during the World Cup. This "debranding" requires venues to replace corporate names with geographic ones—like changing AT&T Stadium to Dallas Stadium—to protect the exclusivity of FIFA’s official global partners
No one cares. Cities, facilities, etc were fighting to be host cities and host venues.
While the skill level of top soccer players is off the charts I find soccer can be boring due to the lack of scoring. When a game can end with a score of 1-0 it's hard to stay excited watching it.
Do you think a no-hitter in baseball is boring or exciting ? In football or basketball, and high scoring outcomes, does that mean the defenses suck ?
 
722963017_1323105456659859_2992686031318167018_n.webp
 
I've been seeing a lot of viral videos of Europeans on road trips in the USA. Hopefully they're having a great time. The videos suggest they are.
The Scots were having a great time in Boston! Saw them on TV at a game in Fenway and the announcers were saying the crowd was more like a play-off crowd with the amount of energy, cheering and a massive "wave". Couple good shots of the shenanigans later on the news!

The sponsorship thing explains why the list states "Boston Stadium". Boston doesn't have a stadium; we've got Fenway, the Garden (Gaaaden) and Gillette. If the seats are empty tomorrow, its because nobody knows where Boston Stadium is!
 
Do you think a no-hitter in baseball is boring or exciting ? In football or basketball, and high scoring outcomes, does that mean the defenses suck ?
A 'no hitter' sucks if it's your team not hitting....it's great if it's your team not allowing hits.

When I took a look at the World Cup results there were nearly as many 'draws' as 'wins' ...Like I alluded to in my earlier post....soccer is a high skill game but it doesn't excite me unless the USA is in it.
 
A 'no hitter' sucks if it's your team not hitting....it's great if it's your team not allowing hits.

When I took a look at the World Cup results there were nearly as many 'draws' as 'wins' ...Like I alluded to in my earlier post....soccer is a high skill game but it doesn't excite me unless the USA is in it.
One of the unique things about soccer is the ball is constantly in play and possession of the ball is hardly ever guaranteed. Appreciating the build up play that leads to chances is part of understanding the skill and tactics that go into the game and for more casual viewers that isn't something worth watching for.

As a Troostian the fellow comments about Kansas City being a terrible city are really naive to me. We are one of the larger soccer hubs of the United States which is one of the reasons we got several top teams based here. I don't think people coming to the city are going to have problem with ravenous gangs or sporadic violence any worse than the rest of us that are just fine. This is a worldwide game. The world cup has been hosted in places far more "dangerous" than anywhere we have to offer and it isn't a problem.
435 and I70 aren't any more backed up than any other week the chiefs are and visitors aren't just wandering over to 35th and prospect at 2 in the morning.
 
I've been really enjoying the videos of fans having fun driving across the USA and seeing the real America. Seems like everyone is having a great time and it's very nice to see.
 
I don't think people coming to the city are going to have problem with ravenous gangs or sporadic violence any worse than the rest of us that are just fine. This is a worldwide game. The world cup has been hosted in places far more "dangerous" than anywhere we have to offer and it isn't a problem.
Seattle (and maybe other cities) have rounded up all their homeless (who are very often drug addicted) and temporarily relocated them to other neighborhoods so that the tourists don't have to see what regular Seattlites have to put up with every day. I guess the 'regular' people don't matter to those in charge.

PS: I spent 9 months in Seattle in 1979 (a few blocks from UW)...it was a beautiful city then...IDK if I'd spend time there now....but then again...my hometown (NYC) isn't very nice anymore either.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom