Why the big push to eliminate ICEs?

Status
Not open for further replies.
People live in their own bubbles, on both sides, and refuse to accept that not everyone has the same use case as them. People living in cities/suburbs with easy access to charging who don’t really drive far are prime candidates for EV’s. People in very remote areas or routinely drive great distances generally aren’t. Those of us in between would be fine with one of each.
 
I'm always surprised there are "sides" but I fully understand why, and it's not better understood by the general public in this hemisphere. It's a technically complex issue, needing a moderate understanding of certain science subjects and fair amount of studying to understand the irreversible pickle the world has found itself in. EVs should not be the focus here but energy demands in general, as @bullwinkle said. Anyone who has offspring should be at least concerned enough to learn about this, or at least accept professional opinion.
 
What push to eliminate ICEs? And by whom?
See post #22. Some states already saying no new gas/diesel cars can be sold starting 2030. Probably wont even let people buy a new vehicle out of state and bring it in.
 
Any laws passed saying no ev’s by a certain date? I am not up on it. I know people make all kinds of proposals, all the time. I don’t think anything is happening in 10 years. Maybe 40 years and even then I don’t think so. More ev means cheaper gas so I am for everything.
 
surprises me that the government didn't mandate electric buses for all public schools. short routes, recharge time between pick-up & drop off. seems the perfect set up. also postal short routes. Gee maybe it's really really expensive.
 
In my opinion, "organic fuel" would be a more accurate term.
If vehicles existed that took straight crude oil into their "fuel" tanks to run, then yeah, you could call it organic. The process of refining crude into gasoline fails the organic test.
 
Let me stable my horse and light my whale oil lamp before putting quill to parchment.
That's kinda the same thought I had.... I'm guessing in the early 1900s, people were saying the same thing, "why the push to get rid of our horse-drawn wagons ?".
 
All I can say is that the states that have plans/laws to not allow any new gas and diesel powered cars to be sold starting 2030 (which really isn't that far off) are going to cause a lot of havoc.
They passed a law saying we need REAL ID to board a plane years ago. That keeps getting pushed back. That law helped make states initiate the processes but since we're not ready, they move the deadlines back. I'm all for EVs but all for letting the free market work to create the demand.
 
ICE is going NOWHERE. Yes, it is kinda getting pushed- but we as a nation get divide over anything anyways! You will see EVs gaining traction-but it is going to take years for any real change happens. We might see 30% of all cars being EV in ten years. You just can’t replace gas and oil overnight. Not to mention many will still hold on to their rides as long as you can. Any automaker that gets rid of all ICE will regret it in 5 yeaSri....
 
I suspect that what will happen is that there is a plan for complete replacement of ICE vehicles. But we all know that there are situations where EV won't work. So there will be (a few) exceptions. But most vehicles will be be EVs.

And the metals in batteries will be recycled.
 
EV's should be encouraged in urban areas, ice's should be allowed in rural areas, there is NO REALISITC way to bring electric vehicles to rural places, there is just no way an electric car can be as reliable as an engine with internal combustion.

I think these pushes are complete nonsense, the mining of the components of lithium is already quite dirty, and is done in the worst matter, contaminating the environment while doing so, so much more than the process of manufacturing and maintaining internal combustion engines.

View attachment 58044 This is LITHIUM MINING

Im not going to explain the impact of lithium contaminating water tables, but it is a huge risk.

These batteries don't last quite as long as an engine either, sometimes these battery packs cost more than a brand new engine or transmission.

The ICE is becoming more and more efficient over the years, we should switch to alternative fuel sources instead of going completely electric.


I don't think everybody understands that everything will eventually degrade, especially when it comes to carbon dioxide, a lot of it dissolves into the ocean after a certain amount of time, lets say 20 years, the other co2 will be consumed by plants.

Amen. This post is golden
 
What push to eliminate ICEs? And by whom? I'd think we would have more success in banning cigarettes in this country then new ICEs.
The auto makers for one...Honda says they won't be making any ICEs after 2040...
 
Honda says they won't be making any ICEs after 2040...
So, that's their choice. It might even backfire on them but as a corporation, they've decided to go down this path. On a smaller scale, this is like me (trying to) recycling as much plastic, cardboard, etc as I can.
 
If vehicles existed that took straight crude oil into their "fuel" tanks to run, then yeah, you could call it organic. The process of refining crude into gasoline fails the organic test.

What about the process makes it not organic?
 
Be advised, the powers-that-be up here ran ads on TV & radio about 'zero traffic fatalities on Washington roads by 2020'.
It was their, uh, 'Goal'. And they failed.
TV ads (which have zero authority to made people abide) and passed legislation
/laws are two different aninals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom