Patman
Staff member
The 0w20 guy will be faster because he’s making 2 extra horsepowerAnd also just found out another buddy with the same GR Supra tacking it....run Motul XCess 5W40. A true thin/thick Supra battle!

The 0w20 guy will be faster because he’s making 2 extra horsepowerAnd also just found out another buddy with the same GR Supra tacking it....run Motul XCess 5W40. A true thin/thick Supra battle!
I'll be taking notes...The 0w20 guy will be faster because he’s making 2 extra horsepower![]()
FWIIW - My family ran a 2010 Prius for 210K miles on 10K OCIs at the dealership. It may be a noble thing to run one or two 5K OCIs while breaking in the engine, but your Toyota is likely to take the recommended 10K OCI in stride. Get the UOAs as you intend to rather than taking any post here based on faith alone.My new 2025 Toyota Camry is a 2.5 L hybrid and calls for 0W-8 GLV-1 oil. My wife takes it for many short trips(5 miles each way to work and 2 miles each way to supermarket with occasional once monthly hour long trips). I already ordered Amsoil 0w-8 for the first 5,000 mile oil change. I will send a sample to Blackstone labs. Other than doing the 5,000 mile changes instead of 10,000 mile changes, what’s an owner to do? I plan to keep the car for ten years-indeed I already purchased a 10 year/100,000 mile warranty.
Unfortunately the problem with this situation won’t show up until an owner or two after. At some point someone may tear into the motor and discover the upper rod bearings worn through a layer or two, but not spun. Eventually a slight rod knock may be present but the engine may run perfectly fine.The 0w20 guy will be faster because he’s making 2 extra horsepower![]()
If only that were the case. Singular uncontrolled UOA aren’t nearly as useful as many imagine them to be.I never understand threads like this because there's a UOA forum and that data tells the truth.
Truth! I would never run a 0w20 if I was going to the track, in fact I would not run anything less than something with a 3.5 HTHS.Unfortunately the problem with this situation won’t show up until an owner or two after. At some point someone may tear into the motor and discover the upper rod bearings worn through a layer or two, but not spun. Eventually a slight rod knock may be present but the engine may run perfectly fine.
I agree and it's why the second guy runs the Motul 5W40. I suspect however for casual track use it will make zero difference. Every weekend? Sure.Truth! I would never run a 0w20 if I was going to the track, in fact I would not run anything less than something with a 3.5 HTHS.
I want to be clear, are you suggesting that a thicker oil would have reduced or eliminated that wear?Here’s a good example(not mine) of upper rod bearing wear. Surprisingly I’ve witnessed about this much wear on engines with no audible indications. Eventually they will get beaten to death and develop rod knock.
View attachment 266514
Rod bearing uppers? Looks like some lugging, is this a manual transmission vehicle?Here’s a good example(not mine) of upper rod bearing wear. Surprisingly I’ve witnessed about this much wear on engines with no audible indications. Eventually they will get beaten to death and develop rod knock.
View attachment 266514
I'd call doing a 2 day event once a year casual vs say 10 days+. Not everyone is out 10/10 here with peaked oil temps etc.Casual Track use
Sounds funny.
Is this a pic from an Engine that was run on Shell Rotella, this pic looks like something I have seen here on this Board a while ago.Here’s a good example(not mine) of upper rod bearing wear. Surprisingly I’ve witnessed about this much wear on engines with no audible indications. Eventually they will get beaten to death and develop rod knock.
View attachment 266514
You brought up a very good point. I was taught not to "lug" an engine, and I always downshift, even with an automatic trans, when going up a hill so the engine can run freely under a lighter load.Rod bearing uppers? Looks like some lugging, is this a manual transmission vehicle?
Yes. Upper rod bearing wear is one of the first indications when to low viscosity is being used in severe service. GM’s temporary fix was going up a grade. Eventually a TSB was released with an upgraded fan clutch to get oil and water temperatures back in check on trucks used for plowing. The plow itself was obstructing air flow even at low speeds.I want to be clear, are you suggesting that a thicker oil would have reduced or eliminated that wear?
This is upper rod bearing halves. Again not my picture, just using as an example of what I’ve seen at the dealership years ago.Rod bearing uppers? Looks like some lugging, is this a manual transmission vehicle?
No idea. Just using the pic as a good example of upper rod bearing wear.Is this a pic from an Engine that was run on Shell Rotella, this pic looks like something I have seen here on this Board a while ago.