Why do certain news stories get major coverage?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In nearly all circumstances I would agree that congress needs to butt out. But one of the main functions of our government is to protect it's citizens.
This whole thing just stinks. After this is all over and that poor lady starves and dehydrates to death, the facts of what her husband benefits from her death, will eventually emerge. Will anybody care then? No. If twenty years from now, medical science discovers a way of helping what Terri suffers from, will anybody care? No.
Sad and setting a dangerous precedent.
 
In almost all cases the press is a business that needs to make money, so they carry stories that have meet their standards and will have as much coverage as possible. Notice the regular animal and local coverage on your local stations ? Before leaving San Diego I found it bizzare that all of a sudden the local stations started carrying regular stories on 'miracle sightings', stuff like vegetables or dirty windows that look like the vigin Mary. It was evidently just blatent pandering to the large and increasing influx of Latinos in the area, probably at the request of their consultants.

I recall reading that someone did a study on the use of language to determine the value that it had for a society. By far the biggest use was 'gossip', and they concluded that evidently it gave people an advantage in social settings. It's a good observation considering what seems like a ridiculous amount of coverage of stories like Peterdaughter or whoever the guy is, thugs parading as your favorite sports heros, and such. Consider how much trash there is on TV and even at your supermarket checkout counter.
 
quote:

There are no winners in the Schievo case.

If her husband would back off and allow her to live, something meaningful could emerge from this situation. Her parents could have the ability to love and care for their daughter, and her husband could carry on with his own family....something he chose to do a long time ago. My feeling is that he stands to gain something here other than carrying out what he claims to be Terri's wishes when she was twenty six years old. It just doesn't "smell" right....that's my gut feeling.
 
In case anyone hasn't noticed, this isn't about Mrs. Schiavo anymore and it's hasn't been for some time....

What began as a personal tragedy has sadly but predictably devolved into an extension of culture war by proxy. The activists on both sides who are piling on to advance their own political or social agendas deserve nothing but contempt.

If you want moral guidance, look to a priest and not a politician....

TS
 
quote:

In case anyone hasn't noticed, this isn't about Mrs. Schiavo anymore and it's hasn't been for some time....

I'm actually surprised that it HAS remained close to the original topic. Politics are a huge part of our way of life in this country, like it or not. It's natural for people to gravitate towards one side or the other on many issues, including poor miss Schiavo. Why? Because any intelligent person would understand that in general democrats lean towards a more open (liberal) view of the "right to die" issues, while republicans have a more conservative stance.
quote:

andrews,
"flip-flops" annoy voters.

I'm not a huge Bush supporter, but I don't see any real contradiction here. The parents have pleaded and begged for help to save their daughter. All the President did was try and allow for this issue to be looked at once again, with more scrutiny, while allowing their daughter to be kept alive. It's been fifteen years, is it unreasonable to have a few more weeks to more closely examine this situation?
 
quote:

Originally posted by andrews:

I'm not a huge Bush supporter, but I don't see any real contradiction here. The parents have pleaded and begged for help to save their daughter. All the President did was try and allow for this issue to be looked at once again, with more scrutiny, while allowing their daughter to be kept alive. It's been fifteen years, is it unreasonable to have a few more weeks to more closely examine this situation?


Actually, yes it is unreasonable, and unconstitutional.
States have a specific amount of autonomy and self governing rights and have their own constitutions as well. This was put in place by the framers of the constitution to limit the power of the federal government.
What the republican congress and Bush did was try an end run around these limits of power trying to create a precident to really become intrusive and controlling on a very local level while also pandering to their christian right base, whom they were losing over a myriad of reasons. Delay was catured on tape saying such.
The chickens are coming home to roost on their policies, most people are beginning to wise up finally.
Clinton was as manipulative, but it seems to me that they were win win manipulations for all even the multinationals... everyone was making good money and having a better quality of life and leisure, can't really say that now, can we.


Back on topic:
The parents had MANY hearings with MANY experts testimony and were unsuccessful at every turn for a reason... their claims are unfounded.
Now they are saying Terri said "I want to live" which is an impossability if you paid attention to the CT scans of her brain and saw the 80% void in where where her cortex should be, I don't mean that there is 20% cortex there I am saying there is only 20% brain left and no cerebral cortex.

The media trots out Pat Boone to relate the story of his grandson which is nice but completely unrealted to Terri's condition, apples and oranges, yet it is couched in the 'possability' arena to confuse the public into believing that there is a chance for her.

This case is simple enough. She said and told more than one person that she would not want life support, the husband is carrying out her wish after exhausting all medical possabilities of rehab. That doesn't get reported very much now does it?
His aggressive attendance to her healthcare and her nursing homes doesn't get reported very much.
I think he is a stand up guy, sticking by his word to her, and taking huge hits personally for doing that.
He could have cashed out many times, big time, yet didn't.
One must look at the mans actions and behaviour throughtout concerning her, and they have been consistant in his dedication to her and her wishes, even when he has another in his life and kids, he maintained his dedication to her. It would have been so much easier to ditch Terri and go on.
He gains nothing from him following through, not financially, not socially, not culturelly.
Only his integrity remains intact.

I wish there were a lot more like him, a no nonsense man of his word.
 
loudist, I agree 100%. I think you made excellent points.
cheers.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by loudist:


What the republican congress and Bush did was try an end run around these limits of power trying to create a precident to really become intrusive and controlling on a very local level while also pandering to their christian right base, whom they were losing over a myriad of reasons. [/QB][/QUOTE]

The actual text of the Act in question can be read here:

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/bill31905.html

Sections 5 and 7 refute your contentions that are quoted above.

I think the members of Congress who voted for this act were troubled, as are many reasonable persons, by the prospect of an innocent woman being starved to death when her family was willing to care for her.
 
Well put Win,
But it really won't matter, the hatred some people have for Bush and the Republicans, blinds them to even the most remote form of compassion. It's just a shame that so many hate filled leftists feel such a need to see this poor woman die.
The end times are near.
 
Interesting Twist.

quote:

A man has been arrested and charged with offering a $250,000 reward for killing Michael Schiavo.

Richard Alan Meywes was arrested in Fairview, North Carolina, by the FBI and the Buncombe County Sheriff's Office.

On March 23, the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office forwarded an email to the FBI in Tampa which reportedly offered a $250,000 bounty on "the head of Michael Schiavo." The email placed an additional $50,000 bounty for the elimination of a judge who recently denied a request to intervene in the Schiavo case.

 
When Clinton was President the left called the right "mean spirited". Now that the right is in power what would you call the left. Answer: Filled with hate. The left has to get over it, Bush won and will be Pres. for nearly 4 more years.
grin.gif
grin.gif
grin.gif

Also the left (and the right) oppose judicial appointments unless they pass 'litmus tests' that each side favor. Judge Greer is a deeply religious Christian who was able to put aside his personal beliefs inorder to rule against the Schindlers wishes. This shows the left that they needn't fear justices just because they are devout Christians. When Rehnquist retires the Democrats must allow Bushs choice to be confirmed.
If they don't then our system is broken beyond repair.
 
Trust me lads, it was an attempt to see if it was possible wrapped in faux compassion for this opportunistic situation. It suceeded on a legal front to get it into Fed courts, but backfired on a political level with the people. Whoops.
If you think for one minute it was for purely compassinate reasons, that's foolish.
Read between the lines of that document.

And look who is throwing hateful speech around here?
What is the Repuplican congress doing otherwise?
Cutting benefits for vets, cutting the very healthcare they are 'attempting' to keep Terri alive with, only now they are getting around to looking into securing our borders.
They act pretty fast when their poll numbers take a hit, so they go straight to 'right to life' 'christian values' rhetoric to rev up their sagging base and poll numbers.
Libs aren't trying to kill her and whomever posted that is hateful.

What is at stake is everyones right to die if it is their wish, it isn't my business, your business, or the governments business.
Its between them and their God, not my God, not your God.
Thats REAL conservatism and republicanism, and not what is being palmed off as conservative republican these days.

Judge Greer is obviously a man with deep integrity, and does not deserve the muck raking being spewed about him by the real haters out there... Hint hint, its not the libs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom