quote:It may be, and then again, it may not. Castrol could have positively tweaked the formulation, or they may have cheapened it. Honestly, I believe it is too early to tell without further analysis and more UOA samples. From the VOA samples, it appears they reduced the calcium in favor of magnesium. But, it is what you can't see in the VOA that is truly important. Regards, Rich
Is there any reason to think that as a more recent oil ie a replacement to the green stuff, that it is in fact superior to the green?
quote:interesting the 2007 heavy duty truck diesels for USA will be adopting similar technology (particle traps, etc). wonder if this means the diesel oils will similarly be modified?
Originally posted by TooSlick: The old GC looked like a HD diesel oil in terms of additive chemistry and sulphated ash and it also had lots of ZDDP. So it would not be at all acceptable for use in many 2006-2007, European gas/diesel engines....
quote:Be honest...how long did it take you to come up with that little ditty?
Originally posted by williar: pschotle. great little limrick there; well said. Thanks for posting!
quote:It took me about 5 minutes...usually when I post a poem it takes around 5-7 minutes because the ideas come pretty quickly; it is just a matter of getting the words and meter the way I want them. TNX to you both for noticing...it is something I enjoy doing "when the muse strikes."
Originally posted by Boxgrover:quote:Be honest...how long did it take you to come up with that little ditty?
Originally posted by williar: pschotle. great little limrick there; well said. Thanks for posting!
quote:So why doesnt Castrol acknowledge that the gold is a slight tweaking of the green's formulation?
Originally posted by TooSlick: The old GC looked like a HD diesel oil in terms of additive chemistry and sulphated ash and it also had lots of ZDDP. So it would not be at all acceptable for use in many 2006-2007, European gas/diesel engines....