I'm going to say the BMW S85, and S63.
This should be fun...
This should be fun...
Totally agree.I'm going to say the BMW S85, and S63.
If I remember the next time I am out there dumping a bodySnap some pics, we might be able to ID.
No, you need to re-read my comment (and think about it this time).In that case, the BMW N54 and N55 also should make the list of reliable motors.
![]()
Lister low RPM engines. Chooka chooka forever.There are some water-cooled engines along a gas line out in the desert. They are so dirty,rusty etc that I can't i d. Them. Look like they have been running since WW2. They are just chugging along
If you really think about it (and I mean give it SERIOUS consideration), any engine can be considered "reliable".No, you need to re-read my comment (and think about it this time).
Anyone can make a crappy motor, turbo or non-turbo. The highest mileage over the road vehicles (tractors) all have turbos and were properly engineered as such. BMW has made some HORRIBLE engines, both turbo and non-turbo (and they are not alone among manufacturers).
Another UZ vote from me.4.7L Toyota V8 would be my choice. But others have their favorites.
https://www.motortrend.com/features/million-mile-tundra-the-tear-down/
The longest lasting engine you wished would die sooner? My buddy had a manual S10 with an iron duke and it was remarkably bad in power, torque and NVH, but it never quit with all the hateful abuse he could throw at it... Kind of like how terrible tires seem to last forever too.GM's 2.5L 4-cylinder Iron Duke . Did nothing well , reliable ran forever in any condition, good emission and basically a golden TURD.
I know I owned one only because I wanted my own engine and transmission in a 82 Camaro and the Iron Duke was the cheapest option. So I ordered the Z28 suspension on a base RS Camaro with the Iron Duke engine and saved I think about $6000. And then built my own engine and transmission to install in it.