What is the consensus on Liqui Moly motorcycle oil?

I visit a few various motorcycle-related sites and can't recall anyone ever mentioning using Liqui-Moly brand motor oil. That may not be a bad thing, as many of us seem to continue using what has worked in the past. With that said, the most mentions I've ever seen for Liqui-Moly seems to be from sponsored YouTubers. ;) It does appear to have the appropriate ratings.
 
I used their 10w-50 in my KTM 1290 Super Duke GT for it's last oil change. No complaints. This bike is picky on oil regarding shift quality. I've got about 2k miles on this oil, no shift issues whatsoever. I would definitely use it again.
 
I visit a few various motorcycle-related sites and can't recall anyone ever mentioning using Liqui-Moly brand motor oil. That may not be a bad thing, as many of us seem to continue using what has worked in the past. With that said, the most mentions I've ever seen for Liqui-Moly seems to be from sponsored YouTubers. ;) It does appear to have the appropriate ratings.
Don’t forget our well-compensated sponsored LM cheerleader, @TiGeo 😂
 
FWIW, I switched to Motorex 15W-50 in my '22 Ducati Multistrada V4 Pikes Peak (vs Shell Advanced), after a used oil analysis w/1,700 miles on the oil had shown the Shell sheared down to a 10W-40.
 
Although it's liqui moly its got no moly in the liqui and that's a good thing cause it'd slip the clutch if it did.
That is not necessarily an accurate blanket statement. Many MC oils have some moly content. Redline MC oils currently show 150 ppm as the spec, and the formula before that was 400+ ppm moly. No issues in my use of Redline in a shared sump. A very recent UOA of BelRay 20w50 on here shows 153 ppm moly. Valvoline MC 10w40 has 94 ppm, Lucas motorcycle oil shows 174 ppm, Amsoil Metric oils generally show 70-90 ppm. Just a few examples I found here on BITOG in used oil analysis and VOA's.

Those numbers are all over the map between different manufacturers and they have JASO ratings.

Looking forward to good discussion and understanding the basis you are coming from.
 
@Panda87 is running HPL primary oil in his Harley primary. It’s got 434 ppm of moly.

 
@Panda87 is running HPL primary oil in his Harley primary. It’s got 434 ppm of moly.

HD's use a dry clutch. The big worry with moly is damaging a wet clutch soaked in oil.
 
@Panda87 is running HPL primary oil in his Harley primary. It’s got 434 ppm of moly.

I still do and have zero slippage. Clutch works phenomenally. Thanks @EvoMan
 
Harley's have a wet clutch but not a shared sump. All the primary fluid has to do is keep the clutch wet which makes a more consistent feel than a dry clutch and flush debris away from the plates. Easy life.
 
All the primary fluid has to do is keep the clutch wet which makes a more consistent feel than a dry clutch and flush debris away from the plates. Easy life.
The primary case of HD also has thick/double chain (with tensioner) which rotates two (double teeth) sprockets.
 
The primary case of HD also has thick/double chain (with tensioner) which rotates two (double teeth) sprockets.
It has a slightly more difficult life in a primary case than the way I portrayed it...

I amend that to it has a relatively easy life compared to a shared sump where the oil is ground by the transmission gears for whatever length oci the owner chooses, provides lubrication for the entire engine, the valve train, the cam chain, associated cam sprockets and the clutch.

I suspect primary case fluid does not see as high of a temperature compared to a shared sump engine.

I believe Harley recommends 10,000 miles on primary case fluid, that ought to tell a lot about how hard it is worked compared to engine oil in a shared sump even though it has a chain, tensioner and two double tooth sprockets along with clutch duties. It's simply appears to not be worked as hard, and that was my point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom