What is PTFE, and how does it fit in API SM?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
356
Location
Indiana (For now)
Im wondering if "PTFE" is GOod or Bad.. I know its an Additive, but im wondering its Level in API SM, and how it dfiffers in API SM.

I know people dislike the additive Teflon in an Oil application.. What did these do to the "Parrafin"-Based Oils, and how far am i off the Mark? .. but myMain question is if "PTFE" is BENEFICIAL or HARMFUL to an Engine, and what is it designed to do?

Thanks!
 
I think I read something along the lines that PTFE has a friction coefficient a hundred times higher than that of the average motor oil. Or something.

I'm pretty sure the general consensus is that it is totally useless, and that the only reason it's in any additives is that no one has ever proved that it's "harmful" per se.

I don't think it has anything to do with API SM.
 
There are some stories that PTFE is now made smaller and useful in an engine oil. I haven't seen the data from Dupont who owns the patent on the product state that anywhere. Maybe someone can provide a link if it exists. From my understanding it is useless in an oil. Yet they are forced to sell it to oil companies who want to use it in oil. Odd?

From an article on the WWW. The independent testing conducted on the lubrication qualities of the PTFE
based lubricants confirms and supports the original statement issued from
DuPont Chemical Corporation, inventor of PTFE and holder of the patents
and trademark for Teflon.

In a statement issued about ten years ago, DuPont’s Fluoropolymers
Division Product Specialists, J.F. Imbalzano said “Teflon is not useful
as an ingredient in oil additives or oils used for internal combustion
engines”. DuPont even threatened legal action against anyone who used
the name “Teflon” on any product destined for use in an internal
combustion engine and refused to sell its PTFE powders to any one
who intended to use them for such purposes. After a flurry of lawsuits
from oil additive makers, claiming DuPont could not prove that PTFE
was harmful to engines, DuPont was forced to once again begin selling
their PTFE to the additive producers.
 
PolyTetraFluoroEthylene, trade name "Teflon", has nothing to do with API SM, or with motor oil at all for that matter.

DuPont, the inventor of Teflon, has said publicly that PTFE has NO BUSINESS being in an internal combustion engine. For a while, they even refused to sell it to companies making oil additives, until they were sued for restriction of trade.

*EDIT*...demarpaint beat me to it...
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: RF Overlord
PolyTetraFluoroEthylene, trade name "Teflon", has nothing to do with API SM, or with motor oil at all for that matter.

DuPont, the inventor of Teflon, has said publicly that PTFE has NO BUSINESS being in an internal combustion engine. For a while, they even refused to sell it to companies making oil additives, until they were sued for restriction of trade.

*EDIT*...demarpaint beat me to it...


LOL It's all good!
 
I'm willing to bet that thread contains more useful information than this current thread will bring.

Originally Posted By: Road Rage
I searched my lube library (I am an ME and was a tribologist, currently IT Director for R&D at a Fortune 8 company). Here is what i found:

1) A US Army study of Slick-50 that found it did not do what it said, and actually increased wear in the cam lobes. It indicated the product should not be used in any internal combustion engines in the Army motor pool.

2) PTFE breaks down at high temps
3) PTFE can migrate under heat and pressure
4) PTFE is an effective dry lubricant and that is where it is best used, such as in space equipment and open gears/rollers
5) When burnt, it forms a corrosive and toxic product.
6) It is chemically inert and resists oil - why would you want that in most areas of an engine? It can be used on piston skirts, con rods, and rocker springs because it resists the accumulation of oil, which in a racing car has benefits, much along the lines of a windage tray.
7) There are no scientific studies I have seen that indicate PTFE colloids will "plate" anything - PTFE plating for the arm of the Space Shuttle is done in a clean-room environment.
8) Moly has a much higher film strength - PTFE does not.
9) I found a gear company that makes a big deal about applying a PTFE coating to its ring and pinion gears. This makes no sense, esp. since the EP addtives in GL-5 gear oils are designed to work on and into the metal, and the OTFE would interfere with that process, leaving only the PTFe trying to cope with high loads - it cannot.

etc, etc,


Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Do a search in this thread for "PTFE"
"And Dr. F.G. Reick, who first patented the colloidal dispersion of PTFE (Pat. 4,224,173), never did prove that his dispersion of PTFE bonded to metal and if so, how it did not shear from metal, supposing it ever did bond to it."

"It is also surmized that at localized hot spots the tetrafluoroethane decomposes such that the fluorine exudes from the particle and sticks to metal causing localized pitting.

Did I mention that it makes a descent grease thickener????"

"What does Teflon do under EP conditions???

It shears like crazy.

The only advantage to using PTFE's in gear boxes is that it reduces gear noise because of it's sound absorbing properties.

It is also a descent a Grease thickener. As a lubricant, forget it!"



Originally Posted By: Bror Jace
Yep, no ejimikated lubophile takes PTFE seriously as an internal comblustion engine lubricant anymore.

Dyno tests show reduced friction for more power and mileage but UOAs (one on this site using Tufoil) seem to indicate increased wear at the same time. The theory is that the teflon particles cause localized lubrication starvation and that's where the additional wear comes from.

--- Bror Jace
 
Why would anybody want to use PTFE in a motor oil when Dupont has stated it has no use in a motor oil and when moly is already available in many motor oils? Even IF PTFE actually works in an engine (big IF) the anti-frictional gains would not be much more than that achieved by moly in chemical combination in the motor oil. The PTFE adds a lot of expense and little if any gain.

PTFE is supposed to reduce friction and wear (which it does, in some applications) but moly in motor oil can do the same things AT LESS PRICE!
 
Originally Posted By: Mystic
Why would anybody want to use PTFE in a motor oil when Dupont has stated it has no use in a motor oil...


That is a argument often heard but it originated how many decades ago???? PTFE particle sizes available now are much smaller than in the Slick50 era. That may reduce the risk of clogged filters, etc.

Is there a value in PTFE? You would have to ask someone who thinks so and ask them.
 
Originally Posted By: TurboJim
Originally Posted By: Mystic
Why would anybody want to use PTFE in a motor oil when Dupont has stated it has no use in a motor oil...


That is a argument often heard but it originated how many decades ago???? PTFE particle sizes available now are much smaller than in the Slick50 era. That may reduce the risk of clogged filters, etc.

Is there a value in PTFE? You would have to ask someone who thinks so and ask them.



If that is in fact the case then does Dupont endorse PTFE for use in motor oil now? If not then it probably still has no value, if they do, then maybe it has some value.
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
If that is in fact the case then does Dupont endorse PTFE for use in motor oil now? If not then it probably still has no value, if they do, then maybe it has some value.


It would be too simple for someone to ask them. We're rather continue our arguments about it.
 
From what I've read I wouldn't want it in my oil. As far as I know no major oil company adds it, if they thought it was good they'd add it. JMO
 
That's right. People are now saying that the particles of PTFE are much smaller and now it works. But if that was true the big motor oil producers would know it and would add the PTFE if it actually worked and offered real benefit. There must be a reason they do not add it. Maybe cost.

But to return to my point above-let us say smaller particles of PTFE do work. We don't know that, but let us say that for now. There is already moly in many oils and also various additives that can sub for the moly. There are already friction reducers that have proven to be economical enough to add to motor oil. The anti-friction requirement is already met. Do we really need to just keep pouring more anti-friction reducers in? Maybe there are other things to consider. Maybe there needs to be a balance of additives working together and not fighting each other.

How many anti-friction reducers do we need? Moly plus PTFE plus graphite plus whatever else? The motor oil companies have already put the anti-friction reducers into the oil!
 
It's all marketing. I have put on many hundreds of thousands of miles on engines and only oil was in my crank case. Everything else around the vehicle fell apart while the engine was still in good running condition. No need to pay for PTFE even if it's OK to use now. Oil works just fine as it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom