The issue is the damage to carburetors when ethanol laced fuel sits inside for an extended period. Figured that was clear from the thread title and the thumbnail of the video.So, what exactly is the issue? Is it ethanol? Is it the base fuel of 87 or 93?
Is it that the fuel attracts moisture?
Is it additive compatibility?
Is it that the fuel bowl is made from cheap stamped steel?
Is it a problem with dissimilar metals causing interaction and corrosion?
Is it caustic catalyst carryover from the refining process?
I know that Ethanol in fuel can cause older plastics to swell and deteriorate, but I see no evidence of that in this video.
I'm just asking what EXACTLY is the issue.
You’re welcome to not watch. It’s your time, do what you want. How do you know it’s a “fairly non scientific test” if you didn’t even watch it? It’s a series of several videos. This one is long because he goes through several steps on 8 different engines to show what the viewers wanted to see. Not gonna be doable in ten minutes.All of the above. What EXACTLY were they testing?
Yeah I couldn't get past 1:34, Put down the fake teef and terrible accents and cheesy suits.
I am NOT watching a 34:43 video to find out the results of a fairly non scientific test. Make a 10 minute video OR make a real detailed LONG video and START with a null hypothesis and what is being tested and the methodology - is this a series video? It's titled "Conclusion" - so 10-15 minutes tops.
DON'T GET ME WRONG. LOOKS LIKE IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN FUN. BUT COME ON MAN.
I burn 87 octane E10 at a 50:1 mix. in a Lawn Boy two cycle. The issues with the ethanol can be everything you mentioned, but there are solutions that will make them non issues. I changed the rubber parts like the fuel line and the 2 seals in the carburetor to Viton. I use no additives. I drain the fuel tank and carburetor bowl and run the engine to burn up the last remaining fuel at the end of the season before putting into storage. The float bowl happens to be made from a type of plastic that is unaffected by ethanol so there is no corrosion. All automobile manufactures have made material changes along these lines to eliminate issues with ethanol.So, what exactly is the issue? Is it ethanol? Is it the base fuel of 87 or 93?
Is it that the fuel attracts moisture?
Is it additive compatibility?
Is it that the fuel bowl is made from cheap stamped steel?
Is it a problem with dissimilar metals causing interaction and corrosion?
Is it caustic catalyst carryover from the refining process?
I know that Ethanol in fuel can cause older plastics to swell and deteriorate, but I see no evidence of that in this video.
I'm just asking what EXACTLY is the issue.
Same here. Had issues issues with Honda small engines that have not had ethanol still gumming up. From what I have noticed it is a gas quality thing. No problems in the areas fed from mainly one supplier but issues where other suppliers are prevalent.I must be one of the lucky ones.. Almost always have ran E10 in my ope for years (15 plus), never did any "winterization" and they always started and ran fine in the spring.
I forgot about the 360...but , in a nut shell , all others junk...Nothing more than a scam in a bottle.No, all others didn't fail.
Stabil 360 seemed to work and at least a couple more.
Too many variables to make a conclusion, like where did all of the original fuel come from. Plus overdosing isn't a true test of the fuel preservative either.
While I think this guy is better than most after a couple of his videos the funny wears off.All of the above. What EXACTLY were they testing?
Yeah I couldn't get past 1:34, Put down the fake teef and terrible accents and cheesy suits.
I am NOT watching a 34:43 video to find out the results of a fairly non scientific test. Make a 10 minute video OR make a real detailed LONG video and START with a null hypothesis and what is being tested and the methodology - is this a series video? It's titled "Conclusion" - so 10-15 minutes tops.
DON'T GET ME WRONG. LOOKS LIKE IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN FUN. BUT COME ON MAN.
Fair points. And to the OP, I'm glad you posted this.You’re welcome to not watch. It’s your time, do what you want. How do you know it’s a “fairly non scientific test” if you didn’t even watch it? It’s a series of several videos. This one is long because he goes through several steps on 8 different engines to show what the viewers wanted to see. Not gonna be doable in ten minutes.
That is the difference. You don't have to store your mower for 6 months during the winter. Also the more sealed the gas tank or container is the better.I use the cheapest E10 87 pump gas I can find in all of my lawn equipment, have for 8+ years, and haven't had any issues from it. I don't see really cold weather though and my equipment doesn't just sit very much.
Even pure gasoline won’t last forever. Photos are the carburetors of a Yamaha XS-1100 that sat inside a shed leaned up against the wall. The fuel, not ethanol, drained out of the two higher carbs and they remained spotless. The two low ones didn’t fare so well….
View attachment 66870
View attachment 66872
Same here. I do put a splash of sta-bil in the fuel for the mower and snowblower right before I stop using them, but otherwise they just sit in my uninsulated garage with the gas in unsealed containers.I must be one of the lucky ones.. Almost always have ran E10 in my ope for years (15 plus), never did any "winterization" and they always started and ran fine in the spring.
I think it's going to come down to the environment they're stored in.Same here. I do put a splash of sta-bil in the fuel for the mower and snowblower right before I stop using them, but otherwise they just sit in my uninsulated garage with the gas in unsealed containers.
It gets very humid up here, it was in the high 90’s with 90%+ humidity for awhile a few days ago. Even in winter we’ll have high humidity.I think it's going to come down to the environment they're stored in.
I'd guess somewhere dry is going to see a lot fewer issues with gummed up or corroded carbs than somewhere humid. This would explain the difference in experiences people seem to have.
It would be interesting to do a poll on this forum to see if that's the case.
Corn is for eating or drinking.
THE END
Hurts liquor production too.there are numerous places on the world where corn is a large part of the indigenous peoples diet. These people are the first to be negatively impacted by higher corn prices.
Those higher prices are a direct result from having a good percentage of the world’s corn harvest being repurposed for fuel use.
Z