me keep it simple a wheel gun like a SW model 10 or 15, 4 inch barrel 38 special she even may like shooting targets with it.
Well said but a scared woman with shaking hands holding a pistol is spooky in itself!!'Owning a handgun does not make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician'. Jeff Cooper.
Good choice!! The 380 is a decent round with manageable recoil. That round in a revolver will work well for you. I prefer revolvers to semi autos for most situations.Absolutely agree with letting her go to handle and even shoot several that feel good in her hand. Example, my mother-in-law is widowed and lives alone. Her grandson (my nephew) kept insisting she get a small semi-auto pistol. She wanted me to take her to shop for one. Got to the store...she couldn't even pull the slide back to chamber a round. We tried all brands they had in stock. Most I could pull with ease...she could only pull ½ way back.
Ended up with a Taurus .380 revolver. From a distance of about 15 or less...she did hit the target well enough to stop most any intruder.
This is exactly right. Especially if you get one of those nice "Airweight" Smiths. It's really not the guns fault, but the ammunition. Most .38 spec. ammo I've seen at the range, and the most commonly sold is the 148 gr bullet, sometimes even in +P loading. Put that in a snubby and you've got some pain coming.Many, many men will suggest a small .38 snub for this task yet in an extensive study done with women, the .38 snub came in dead last for what they actually liked and could shoot. Let her shoot and test
Hi jsert.22wmr, even handgun specific ammo, fired out of a short barrel has way too much bark for not all that much more bite. the flashbang is truly off-putting for someone with little shooting experience, making accurate followon shots difficult. i got rid of a ruger lcr 22wmr in favor of a lcr 22lr. i still do like 22wmr through a longer barreled ruger single six or rifle when outdoors. the key to civilian defensive use of rimfire ammo is consistently putting many fast rounds into centermass. centerfire ammo works defensively for most civilians with fewer hits and on the extremities of the target. i have put 2000ish rounds through the lcr 22lr, practicing with speedloaders. i found that i can shoot, at 3 yards, 3 inch grouped double tap ammo dumps on-target, clean through 3 inches of telephone books and plywood backing. being a revolver the lcr 22lr can shoot a variety of ammo, important during ammo droughts or if seeking softer rounds, e.g. 22short or 22lr quiet. as a ccw, in my hands, in my tame locales, 22lr works for me.
Cindy tried some 95 grain 38's and liked those pretty wellMy wife wants one as well. A stainless steel 38 cal revolver imo is the way to for her.
hello tikka. i see that you are in the u.k. where i understand that 22wmr is highly esteemed as a rifle caliber given your unfortunate gun restrictions. i certainly understand your premise; it was mine when i bought a ruger lcr 22wmr double revolver with a 1 7/8” barrel. however i quickly learned that it was unpleasant enough to not enjoy practice so i found it another, happier owner. admittedly i only shot it an an indoor shooting range. my own experience shooting 22wmr out of a ruger single six single action revolver with either a 4 5/8” or 5.5” barrel is much easier and “funner,” especially outdoors. i even tried handgun specific 22wmr ammo in the lcr, it just wasn’t worth it. come to think of it, i also don’t at all enjoy shooting the other magnum handgun caliber, 357mag.Hi jsert.
I am not disagreeing with you. Just asking questions.
I have owned and shot a lot of handguns. I have however, never even carried a handgun, let alone used one to defend myself.
My initial thoughts were that the .22 WMR could well be ideal. A step up in power from the LR, but still easy to control when operated by a senior.
My experience of the WMR has been through longer barrels.
Does it really 'bark' and 'flashbang' that much from a short barrel? I was thinking there was not enough powder in that little case to get any negative results.
Thanks.