I think that if you divide the driven miles of the FCA mini vans divided by the number of vans sold and compare that math with Honda or Toyota you will see that not only do the current iteration of transmissions last as long or longer ,but if they do fail out of warranty, the cost is about half as much to replace as the Japanese minivans, especially the AWD Toyota. I am a serial owner of FCA minivans. They have known issues but I have never had a transmission issue starting with my first one in 1999, my second in 2005 or my current 2014. 50k fluid and filter changes probably had something to do with it. The '14 we have now shifts up and down hard when cold and is still a little firm when at temp. ECO mode exacerbates this characteristic. The first two vans are well over 200k miles with original drivetrains, 3.8L and the previous generation of transmission that got all the hate. The current generation transmission has not gotten near the press coverage as the earlier models. It has never been reflashed, never been to the dealer in 60k miles. I service and repair it myself. The "mechanics" at dealerships are 99% idiots. The one good one per 100,000 is hard to find. The OP should leave the FCA for others and get something good like a Ford Focus with the DCT or the current Honda DI engine that puts as much gasoline into the crankcase as it does the combustion chamber. Maybe a Subaru, flip that coin whether it needs heads or an engine before 100k miles.......see where I am heading?
I understand what you are saying, however you are also reinforcing the fact that the current generation Caravan transmissions are troublesome, If i understand correctly you are saying you 2014 has 60k miles and is acting up, which is par for the course from people I know of that have them. My mothers neighbor has a 2013, its on its third transmission, a coworker had a 2011 its transmission is horrible at 100k miles, another coworker had a 2015, traded in at 70k miles when transmission started acting up. Yet another coworker had a routan which had to have the transmission blow a pump seal under warrant and when it was approaching 100k miles the transmission started doing Chrysler stuff like you described so they traded it in.
Reading your post you say you have never had transmission issues, then go on to describe the transmission problem you are currently having with your 2014....
I would wager that per miles driven FCA products have more transmission issues comparable vehicles just from people I know of.
I am on a Chrysler van group on FB, transmission problems on the current generation of caravan are abundant. I just cannot fathom having a vehicle that has a transmission that has a high relatively high percentage of vehicles that cant make it to 100k miles without transmission issues.
Even the junk early '00s honda automatics could usually make it to 100k without issue.
To be fair my mother has a 02 Caravan with 100k and the transmission is still perfect with one filter change and 3 fluid changes since new. I will also say it is a 4cyl so maybe that has helped. I also think they had the 41TE as good as it would ever be by then. It was purchased new and has been a great value, it has had its share of problems common to that generation of caravan so it not has been perfect. (Abs, Trac and brake light are on and vehicle doesnt have Abs or traction control, the problems have largely been electrical gremlins)
We have a AWD Sienna which as you pointed out has a transmission that is very expensive to replace, We are at 16 years old and 100k miles and it has been flawless, and from what I am seeing it is likely to make it at least another 100k miles without issue. This particular vehicle does more towing than many f150s will ever do in their lifetimes, I maintain it, though I dont baby it.
Yes there are some Sienna transmissions that have blown up, yes there are some current generation caravans with 300k on the original transmissions. It just seems there are so many horror stories with the 62TE transmissions it will make your head spin.