Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: Mykl
Originally Posted By: antiqueshell
Wow, full court press "psy ops" at work. LOL
The phrase "out of context" must be the new obfuscation tool of the moment.
It's not working anymore, you cannot "construct" reality as you see fit.
PNAC anyone? How about NAU?
Construct reality?
The person suggesting the simplest possible reasonable outcome is the one who's guilty of employing deception tactics but the person stringing together a bunch of completely unrelated, unconnected, out of context quotes by various people who haven't met one another, much less talked, to support the idea that there's this shadow organization run by the most powerful people in the world is not guilty of that?
Is that how you defend your shaky position? By attempting to discredit naysayers via snide, sarcastic comments rather than actually address the person's argument?
Trying to have a sane, rational discussion with somebody who is obviously the mental equivalent of being on a permanent acid trip is likely not going to result in anything other than frustration. At least that's been my experience with him in this thread and others.
The guy actually PMed me and insinuated I'm a paid government disinformation agent because I disagreed with him. I guess he thinks I was sent here to BITOG to "deny the truth".
Originally Posted By: Mykl
Originally Posted By: antiqueshell
Wow, full court press "psy ops" at work. LOL
The phrase "out of context" must be the new obfuscation tool of the moment.
It's not working anymore, you cannot "construct" reality as you see fit.
PNAC anyone? How about NAU?
Construct reality?
The person suggesting the simplest possible reasonable outcome is the one who's guilty of employing deception tactics but the person stringing together a bunch of completely unrelated, unconnected, out of context quotes by various people who haven't met one another, much less talked, to support the idea that there's this shadow organization run by the most powerful people in the world is not guilty of that?
Is that how you defend your shaky position? By attempting to discredit naysayers via snide, sarcastic comments rather than actually address the person's argument?
Trying to have a sane, rational discussion with somebody who is obviously the mental equivalent of being on a permanent acid trip is likely not going to result in anything other than frustration. At least that's been my experience with him in this thread and others.
The guy actually PMed me and insinuated I'm a paid government disinformation agent because I disagreed with him. I guess he thinks I was sent here to BITOG to "deny the truth".