Originally posted by cvl:
[QB] You guys should check out manufacturer's recommended viscosities for cars sold in the US Versus the exact same car sold overseas.
One such example is the new Civic Si in the States. Honda USA recommends 5w20.........For the EXACT same car sold in England........10w-40 oil.
________________________________________________
cvl - I saw the same contrast with my car - Ford Contour here in the US is the big seller Mondeo in Europe and Australia. The 2.5 V6 is a nice running alum block motor. Here of course 5-30 is all she wrote. The Euro Mobil site has a very interesting specs page for this car - it says the Ford spec is 5-30 yet a footnote says Mobil still recommends 10-40 !! in opposition to the OEM !
My experience over the years has been that a higher SAE grade oil will provide more wear protection than a thin oil. HOWEVER there are some constraints. A motor that does not see frequent WOT use, does not pull a trailer or push snow and is not expected to go much beyond 100k miles can exist happily on anything that does not sludge. Road racing, autocrossing, "spirited" street driving give you a reason to go with a X-40 rather than a 30 wt. The newest Mustang Cobra uses M1 15-50 as a factory fill. Highly loaded bearings are why. Never push down on the pedal to produce more than 125 BHP max and SAE 0-20 will work fine.
As far as the many, many discussions on pumpability, "too thick" etc. put it in perspective over the entire real world temp range that the oil must operate in. The Mobil-1 0-40 that I am currently using in some of my cars is 12.5 cP at 225 degrees F (while I am in summer traffic w/ the A/C on). Mobil drive clean 5-30 is 9 at this temp. This is too thin for my preferences. BUT put this into perspective - the almighty "5-30" Mobil Drive clean (which is a bit thin in grade compared to other brands) at 75 degrees F when I started the car this morning was 120 cP. In December when it is 32 deg. F the 5-30 will be 500 cP ! Realize that this is a logrithmic scale but somehow the resistance of using a -40 in place of a -30 because of the arguements over high temp visc differences escapes me.
Last thoughts from engine teardowns & rebuilds- boundry lubrication (moly etc)does not apply to bearings. If the oil presssure is lost under power(like the sweeping turn at Lime Rock) the bearings melt and go away in the blink of an eye. Closer to home for our use on the street
I do not see thousanths difference between old engines with good and poor oil maintenance. The difference I see is ten-thousanths. It is really a difference of metal surface quality (as the term is used in machine shops)- the scuff resistance the oil provides- that I see. 2 cylinders that mic up about the same can show visual differences that I attribute to oil protection. Take two motors with 125K miles, one a clanky oil burner, the other a fairly tight quiet running unit. The differences in specs will be measured in 10ths(thousands) not thousands of an inch. This is why "Million mile motor still in spec" ads are worhtless as a claim.
All-in-all my interest in browsing this forum is to learn more about the best products and practices for keeping engines tight for OVER 150K. With most engines these days, if your target is less than that the discussions here are mostly academic.
Interesting stuff tho- with engineering, Madison Av, EPA, legal departments all trying to tell us a somewhat varying story about what is best for us all.........
quote:
Originally posted by buster:
It seems that all of us still really have varying opinions on this subject. I'm just curious if most people subscribe to the idea that a thicker oil is better for engine wear? The Steve Bergin article makes you think otherwise. What is exactly is the relationship between viscosity and wear? I don't think we have the answer yet but Bob and others have pointed out that thinner oils with greater flow might be as good or better.
Sorry, couldn't keep up with you here. Could you explain your point a little more?quote:
Realize that this is a logrithmic scale but somehow the resistance of using a -40 in place of a -30 because of the arguements over high temp visc differences escapes me.
here is by brand, but not weight. again, sorry for the formatting. i hope this is easier to read than the last one. it is important to take mileage into account when looking at this list. one sample of 3004 miles isn't really a good test.quote:
Originally posted by Ray Garlington:
Tweaker43,
It appears that on average, the Maxima likes the heavier grade oils better than the thinner grade oils.
Can you identify which of the oils on the spreadsheet are synthetics to see if synth only results would be different? Also, how old are the maximas that are represented here (any particular year)?
No QuadDriver, you are wrong with the German speed limits. The recommended speed is 130km/h but the Autobahn is still wide open, with no actual speed limits away from cities. I was there recently, and if you don't believe me go to:quote:
Originally posted by QuadDriver:
The autobahn (which simply means motorway, not high speed proving track) now has a 130kph speed limit for its entire length, and due to safety emissions concerns, is 100kph in populated areas - welcome to the 2000's.
there is a misconception that the average joe in europe drives a bimmer or mercedes or lambo,
hehheh, I once complained about this and even went as far as posting the top 10 lists of vehicles sold in europe (which as a whole has about the same size new vehicle market as the USA). I dont think it was the answer anyone wanted to hear.quote:
Originally posted by Mark in NY:
reference to the secondary topic in this thread-
Isn't the discussion on Euro cars, oils, and speed limits centered far to much on Germany?
There are dozens of countires in -western- Europe alone.
Fiats, Vauxhauls, Citroens, Ford of Euro, etc etc etc comprise the field. All I see referenced is BMW, MB.
Mark in NY,quote:
reference to the secondary topic in this thread-
Isn't the discussion on Euro cars, oils, and speed limits centered far to much on Germany?
There are dozens of countires in -western- Europe alone.
Fiats, Vauxhauls, Citroens, Ford of Euro, etc etc etc comprise the field. All I see referenced is BMW, MB.
Ooh! Ooh! Let's talk about Trabants!quote:
Originally posted by moribundman:
There's just no way to talk about all of them.
I don't see any evidence in the UOA section to support this contention. If I've missed a UOA that will back this up please post the link. I realize that good back-to-back comparisons of one viscosity to another are scarce as hen's teeth but I've found a couple of good ones between M1 0w-40 and M1 Xw-30 that show that the 30-weight protected as well as or better than the 40-weight.quote:
Originally posted by Mark in NY:
...This is why I continue to harp on viscosity here. It is the one variable that is easily adjusted on our street cars that can make a difference in engine life...
Jay,quote:
As far as the Maxima spreadsheet data is concerned, I don't think it's useful because you're not comparing apples to apples. If you look at the individual UOAs you'll find a wide range of exceptions (like 30-weight user "A" uses a K&N air filter, user "B" had a coolant leak, etc.) that make the data useless for the type of comparison shown.
Except for a few Jaguars, Saabs and Volvos, how many European cars are sold in North America are not German? Mexican-made VW's can also be counted as German-branded at least. Most members of this board are located in the USA/Canada.quote:
Originally posted by Mark in NY:
reference to the secondary topic in this thread-
Isn't the discussion on Euro cars, oils, and speed limits centered far to much on Germany?
There are dozens of countires in -western- Europe alone.
Fiats, Vauxhauls, Citroens, Ford of Euro, etc etc etc comprise the field. All I see referenced is BMW, MB.
quote:
Originally posted by moribundman:
There's just no way to talk about all of them.
Ooh! Ooh! Let's talk about Trabants!