I'm in the "I want to give my engine the 'room' to advance its spark when it wants to" camp.
Stay away from anything 2017 or older. 2018 + are pretty solid vehicles. I used 87 on our 2019 Q5 for 60k miles with zero engine issues. In addition I also had a 2018 A4 and 2018 Q5 that were fed 87 without issue. I wouldn't call it being cheap it is Not throwing away money needlessly. As for loss of performance you would need a stopwatch to tell the difference. My gas mileage was the same. I do run Premium only in cars that require it. If I were you I would buy the car run on regular then premium to see if you see a difference. As for cost to run plugs are a snap on the 2.o so is the serpentine belt. Brakes are easy just the rear has an electric parking brake.So we're considering an Audi Q5 with the 3rd generation EA888 and direct injection.
Owners manual calls for 87 min but 91 recommended. Before you start, yes I am a cheap bastard that abuses every vehicle I own to the very last inch of it's life, within the parameters of not causing permanent damage. It is a ~$25 extra cost per tank to use premium.
I am not an automotive engineer but I will challenge that here in Canada where we get frigid winters for 8 months of the year, where the temperature dips below freezing and in the months of November to February where it can get to -30C or -22F, the engine is probably receiving an equally ice cold jet of fuel while the parameters are perfect for a turbo engine to NOT knock or detonate. IE we are so far to the edge of the temperature/timing advance tables that it just won't matter. Sometimes it takes 20 minutes of driving before the thermostat even opens in the winter. What do you think?
The OP?In hot weather with significant engine loads (accelerating, AC on, etc.), don't be surprised if your engine hesitates and the check engine light flickers on.
Compression release option?
Octane and fuel ignitability are invariably linked.LSPI is a different issue and different possible mitigations.
There’s little to no connection between fuel octane rating and propensity for LSPI. That’s connected to engine design and the oil.Octane and fuel ignitability are invariably linked.
I don't understand why this is a question. Follow the owners manual. The only difference is that your engine will not make max power on 87. I have no idea what that means in actual HP/TQ.So we're considering an Audi Q5 with the 3rd generation EA888 and direct injection.
Owners manual calls for 87 min but 91 recommended. Before you start, yes I am a cheap bastard that abuses every vehicle I own to the very last inch of it's life, within the parameters of not causing permanent damage. It is a ~$25 extra cost per tank to use premium.
I am not an automotive engineer but I will challenge that here in Canada where we get frigid winters for 8 months of the year, where the temperature dips below freezing and in the months of November to February where it can get to -30C or -22F, the engine is probably receiving an equally ice cold jet of fuel while the parameters are perfect for a turbo engine to NOT knock or detonate. IE we are so far to the edge of the temperature/timing advance tables that it just won't matter. Sometimes it takes 20 minutes of driving before the thermostat even opens in the winter. What do you think?
Ok. LSPI and "pinging" or pre-ignition while towing heavy in the heat with a twin turbo DI engine have no correlation? Trying to understand how LSPI isn't mitigated somewhat by octane rating. Always thought the undesireable result is pre-ignition whether it's turbo pressure/carbon buildup, along with lugging, or too low octane and to much timing before TDC.There’s little to no connection between fuel octane rating and propensity for LSPI. That’s connected to engine design and the oil.
There was one paper posted here that showed a correlation to how the rating was achieved (adjuncts) but not to the rating itself.
Pinging is regular old pre-ignition which isn’t the same thing as LSPI. I realize they have somewhat similar names but they aren’t the same thing.Ok. LSPI and "pinging" or pre-ignition while towing heavy in the heat with a twin turbo DI engine have no correlation? Trying to understand how LSPI isn't mitigated somewhat by octane rating. Always thought the undesireable result is pre-ignition whether it's turbo pressure/carbon buildup, along with lugging, or too low octane and to much timing before TDC.
Ok. LSPI and "pinging" or pre-ignition while towing heavy in the heat with a twin turbo DI engine have no correlation? Trying to understand how LSPI isn't mitigated somewhat by octane rating. Always thought the undesireable result is pre-ignition whether it's turbo pressure/carbon buildup, along with lugging, or too low octane and to much timing before TDC.