US UFO Disclosure Day

If these guys are found to be lying while testifying under oath I hope they pay the price. It's amazing how well some people can lie.

 
Last edited:
Follow the money. He's one of a group that collects income from paid interviews, paid TV/media programs, books, and UFO enthusiasts lecture tours.
Maybe. Multiple things can be true and false at same time. Too many people forget that. You can lie, exaggerate, even stretch it but still be telling the truth and profit. Lazar isn't at the top of my credibility list. There are far better examples. Karl Nell is one.
 
I know coffee cups are real because I have one sitting in front of me right now. I can pick it up. I can handle it. I can break it. Not a fuzzy picture of something that someone is telling me is a coffee cup. Not someone claiming coffee cups exist while not actually handing me a coffee cup. I can actually grasp it.
I seen it! I seen it! doesn't work.
Everything presented by the it's aliens folks are not substantiated with solid evidence. Just fuzzy pictures, fuzzy video, and people swear it's true.
 
I know coffee cups are real because I have one sitting in front of me right now. I can pick it up. I can handle it. I can break it. Not a fuzzy picture of something that someone is telling me is a coffee cup. Not someone claiming coffee cups exist while not actually handing me a coffee cup. I can actually grasp it.
I seen it! I seen it! doesn't work.


I'm thinking of Donald Hoffman and his avatar type theory.
 
I know coffee cups are real because I have one sitting in front of me right now. I can pick it up. I can handle it. I can break it. Not a fuzzy picture of something that someone is telling me is a coffee cup. Not someone claiming coffee cups exist while not actually handing me a coffee cup. I can actually grasp it.
I seen it! I seen it! doesn't work.
Everything presented by the it's aliens folks are not substantiated with solid evidence. Just fuzzy pictures, fuzzy video, and people swear it's true.



1778547751343.webp
 
These theorists get so down in their rabbit holes of theory that they lose sight that they are ignoring that I am experiencing something. I exist. Math explains things, but Math is not what I am.
 
These theorists get so down in their rabbit holes of theory that they lose sight that they are ignoring that I am experiencing something. I exist. Math explains things, but Math is not what I am.
LOL true. It's just interesting to me. Don't care one way or the other. I get tired of talking about the same dismal topics. Do we know yet if capitalism is the best economic system?
 
Maybe. Multiple things can be true and false at same time. Too many people forget that. You can lie, exaggerate, even stretch it but still be telling the truth and profit. Lazar isn't at the top of my credibility list. There are far better examples. Karl Nell is one.
So, what if you had someone who had also promoted to O-6, had led broader change across their service than Colonel Nell, a person who managed projects totaling hundreds of millions, who, unlike Colonel Nell, had multiple command tours, and a degree in Astrophysics, not just EE.

Would that person have equal credibility in your eyes?

Even if that person wasn’t the attention-seeking braggart that Karl Nell appears to be on his LinkedIn page?
 
So, what if you had someone who had also promoted to O-6, had led broader change across their service than Colonel Nell, a person who managed projects totaling hundreds of millions, who, unlike Colonel Nell, had multiple command tours, and a degree in Astrophysics, not just EE.

Would that person have equal credibility in your eyes?

Even if that person wasn’t the attention-seeking braggart that Karl Nell appears to be on his LinkedIn page?
Is he telling me what I want to hear?
 
So, what if you had someone who had also promoted to O-6, had led broader change across their service than Colonel Nell, a person who managed projects totaling hundreds of millions, who, unlike Colonel Nell, had multiple command tours, and a degree in Astrophysics, not just EE.

Would that person have equal credibility in your eyes?

Even if that person wasn’t the attention-seeking braggart that Karl Nell appears to be on his LinkedIn page?
I base my judgement on several things not one thing per se. In general, I would hold physicists/scientists in the highest regard, or pilots like yourself, Cujet and Commander David Fravor (famous Tic Tac incident). It really depends on the overall quality of the person.

I actually thought of you when I saw this video bc you said you saw something that turned out to be a reflection.

 
LOL true. It's just interesting to me. Don't care one way or the other. I get tired of talking about the same dismal topics. Do we know yet if capitalism is the best economic system?
I find the whole Reality vs Illusion topic to be an exercise in silliness.

It is certainly not a scientific topic and not even a philosophical topic.

If you don't believe in a reality when the evidence of reality is right in front of you, then don't drive, don't go to a doctor, don't use currency to purchase items, etc., etc., because none of these things are real.

Illusionists should stay in their little box of nonreality and pontificate to their cultist followers.
 
Well, no

In Logic, according to the Law of the Excluded Middle, something is either True or False and there is no middle maybe.
A person can lie but also be telling the truth. One can embellish or exaggerate, while also be telling the truth. Ever know someone that exaggerated a lot, but ultimately was telling the truth?

For example, what if Lazar saw what he said he saw, but lied about attending MIT? So, yes, you can.
 
"I'm smart enough to know that I'm dumb" - Richard Feynman.

The skeptics/physicists are technically correct. Distances are just too far. I'm aware of that. I'm still of the mindset thought that there is something more to this but until then.....
I agree! I also enjoy these discussions, a lot of bright minds here, but not bright enough to prove anything to me, no insult intended. As I said earlier, I have never read or heard logical or otherwise how we got here. Lots of scientific data and theories, but to me there seems to be voids leaving a lot to the imagination. The Big Bang created the earth from what, and what created the what? Inquiring minds want to know. ;)

Back on topic, can anyone prove nothing intelligent exists anywhere else? I can't prove it does, and no one has proven it doesn't. Just because we/they can't travel here doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Time for me to ponder what to do today, who/whatever created retirement was brilliant!!
 
I find the whole Reality vs Illusion topic to be an exercise in silliness.

It is certainly not a scientific topic and not even a philosophical topic.

If you don't believe in a reality when the evidence of reality is right in front of you, then don't drive, don't go to a doctor, don't use currency to purchase items, etc., etc., because none of these things are real.

Illusionists should stay in their little box of nonreality and pontificate to their cultist followers.
So, you're saying scientists should stop studying the nature of reality? Of course it's a scientific and philosophical topic. What else would it be?

No, that's what scientists do. That's exactly what they are supposed to do. Physicists literally study the fundamental aspects of nature. I don't think you quite understand Dr Hoffman and I'm sure in his presence you wouldn't say it's absurd. Tell Federico Fggins to stop studying the nature of reality.

Maybe you're behind the times?



1778583625882.webp
 
Last edited:
"The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics recognized groundbreaking experiments that proved the universe is not "locally real," challenging the fundamental nature of reality. The work of John Clauser, Alain Aspect, and Anton Zeilinger showed that particles do not possess defined properties until measured (lack of realism) and can be influenced by others instantly over distances (lack of locality)."

How on Earth could anyone make the claim that studying the nature of reality isn't a scientific or philosophical question.
 
Back
Top Bottom