Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Why of course! Government always does best!
You know where I stand, I'm a free market kind of guy. But the sale of oil to other countries directly undermines this one. It may need a tax on exports or some such lever to make an incentive to sell it here.
Well, it looks like what you want already exists, but there are problems with this:
Quote:
But the increasing domestic output of light sweet crude is a poor match for U.S. refineries, which have been reconfigured to process much heavier and sulphurous oils and need heavier oils to produce more heating oil and diesel.
Pressure will therefore build for the federal government to permit crude exports.
And:
Quote:
If U.S. light crude production continues to grow, it may eventually be necessary to approve swap arrangements with refineries further afield.
The main constraint is political. U.S. refiners can be expected to lobby fiercely against swap transactions, since they benefit most from the over-supply of captive domestic crude. And export opponents will be able to mount a powerful emotional appeal to keeping "American oil" at home for American use.
Against this, domestic producers will lobby to be allowed to export to maximize the economic value of their output, and will likely receive strong support from trading companies.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/15/us-column-kemp-us-oilexports-idUSBRE89E0OQ20121015