Other interesting cars destroyed for questionable reasons;
View attachment 83374
View attachment 83375
Lots more 'grey market' cars too.
In the front of the car, there is a radiator and condenser on each side.Dumb question, since I dont own 1 of these, is that the radiator or AC Condenser in the front of the car?
Yes.Dumb question, since I dont own 1 of these, is that the radiator or AC Condenser in the front of the car?
Since I don't use my AC, yeah AC Condenser and then Radiator. I am guessing this car has long radiator hoses and 1 heck of a Water Pump.Yes.
What a bunch of idiots running the asylum at GM. No wonder the price of new cars are so much. Instead of at least dismantling and selling the parts for an easy $10K per, they decided to get a few hundred in scrap value instead.https://www.yahoo.com/autos/tornado-damaged-c8-corvettes-destroyed-223000825.html
"Those cars were damaged in the storm and have already been crushed"
What a bunch of idiots running the asylum at GM. No wonder the price of new cars are so much. Instead of at least dismantling and selling the parts for an easy $10K per, they decided to get a few hundred in scrap value instead.
What a bunch of idiots running the asylum at GM. No wonder the price of new cars are so much. Instead of at least dismantling and selling the parts for an easy $10K per, they decided to get a few hundred in scrap value instead.
Those parts have been installed, and would be considered "used". Reselling them is not something GM would want to do. Consider the labor to dismantle, assess damage, etc. and it becomes a financial...and liability...nightmare.What a bunch of idiots running the asylum at GM. No wonder the price of new cars are so much. Instead of at least dismantling and selling the parts for an easy $10K per, they decided to get a few hundred in scrap value instead.
Not at all uncommon for any manufacturer to take that route. Why would they risk selling cars or components that may have flood like issues down the road? Something GM would ultimately need to cover under warranty? Why would they pay employees to dismantle them and reassemble them (poorly)? Why would they let cars off their lot that may have reputation harming issues down the road? Would you buy a zero mile car that costs 70+ grand when you know that it has already been messed up?What a bunch of idiots running the asylum at GM. No wonder the price of new cars are so much. Instead of at least dismantling and selling the parts for an easy $10K per, they decided to get a few hundred in scrap value instead.
When an insurance company pays off on a total, they get possession of the car. Then they can sell it at a salvage auction and get $20-$30K for it. No such thing here if GM is scraping them directly.Almost certainly they got paid more from their insurance
Of course, that's why they have salvage auctions where at least they would get back $20-$30K.Those parts have been installed, and would be considered "used". Reselling them is not something GM would want to do. Consider the labor to dismantle, assess damage, etc. and it becomes a financial...and liability...nightmare.
When an insurance company pays off on a total, they get possession of the car. Then they can sell it at a salvage auction and get $20-$30K for it. No such thing here if GM is scraping them directly.
If GM is self-insured on these, which is highly likely, they are the insurer and already have possession of and are disposing of the cars.When an insurance company pays off on a total, they get possession of the car. Then they can sell it at a salvage auction and get $20-$30K for it. No such thing here if GM is scraping them directly.
What's damaged on them? All they need are the bolt on parts (hood, doors, fenders, etc.) to be complete, right?