This Former Jaguar Owner is Embarrassed

Status
Not open for further replies.
I could throw an ad like that together in three minutes in Photoshop. However, sometimes simpler is better.
 
Hr1Chv1.jpg

9BNB3wo.jpg
 
The problem is, that customer base doesn't buy luxury cars, and particularly not Jag's. You might see one in a Subaru, Prius or old Honda Fit but this isn't a demographic rolling in money. Have you ever watched Ru Paul's "Drag Race"? These are not people with considerable quantities of disposable income that they are going to whimsically spend on quirky Indian/British luxury cars. Nor is the demographic all that large.

This seems absolutely suicidal.

The only person I know personally who owns a Jag is in the customer base they just took a scorched earth approach to: a retired HVAC business owner who traded in his Corvette for something a bit more luxurious, while still somewhat sporty. He's in his 70's.
Too late for Jag. That portion of previosus Saturn owners already moved to Subaru.
 
Remember the commercials when Infinity launched in NA? Narration and scenes of nature. NO cars. Everyone said it was doomed to fail.
 
Infiniti's launch ads, without cars, were a necessity because they were trying to line up or hold onto a dealer and distribution network already under contract. Yeah, they might have been stupid, but the gambit worked and the brand's been successful for 35 years. Plus the brand has more panache than Nissan, which is something of a "low credit buyer" joke now. They are assuredly a Madison Ave. case study on how to launch a product when the product is unavailable.
 
Certainly not a fan of the direction they're going in; I've never been a fan of mixing business and "politics" in any shape or form. It's a no-win situation no matter which way you look at it, considering you will always alienate once side of the isle.

However, if they're considering moving further up market to the ultra luxury segment and expecting people to pay $140,000+ for one of their new electric cars, they certainly need to make sure they appeal to the correct target market with the means to actually buy one. I'm merely expressing an opinion here, but this so called "commercial" of gender confused Teletubbies has denigrated such an iconic British brand, William Lyons must be turning in his grave. They've gone as far as getting rid of the cat in the logo that's been around since 1957.

Imagine going from what Enzo Ferrari described as the "most beautiful car in the world" to this as a means of rebranding. Cars like the D-Type, E-Type, F-Type, XJ220, F-Type Project 7 and XE Project 8 come to mind. Jaguar was never really about reliability as much as it was about heritage and prestige. Now it's about as bland as an M&S ham and mustard sandwich.
 
Yep, the death of decent cars is what I'm sad about. However, I don't think Jaguar is solely to blame.
Cafe, subsidies, and luxury buyers looking at EV
Sure is always more to blame than meets the eye lots of times , when long time successful institutions/companies go under. Good people always suffer the fall out. Bad people from (misguided gov, greedy uncaring owners, uncapable managers, to others) it seems all too often get to escape unscathed. That is the really sad part.
 
This is the disingenuous part of what Jaguar are doing. They still have quite a serious problem with warranty claims and parts supply on the current cars and yet the stated intention of this new marketing campaign is to move the brand further up market with no doubt prices to match. You would think they would fix their quality control problems first. But then at the top of the market where people have more money than sense, cars can sell on image alone rather than reliability. It still has to look good quality but may sell even if it's consistently near the bottom of reliability surveys. Range Rover is a case in point.
Very TRUE...
 
Infiniti's launch ads, without cars, were a necessity because they were trying to line up or hold onto a dealer and distribution network already under contract. Yeah, they might have been stupid, but the gambit worked and the brand's been successful for 35 years. Plus the brand has more panache than Nissan, which is something of a "low credit buyer" joke now. They are assuredly a Madison Ave. case study on how to launch a product when the product is unavailable.
Every time I see a Mitsubishi or Ram truck I think “Zero interest, zero down.” Instantly upside down.
 
Love the look of Cujet's Jag, older Jags and even the F-Pace. While the commercial is polarizing, don't count Jag out yet. First and foremost, it has caught people attention. A lot of the woke demographic is portrayed as poor kids, there is also a quiet group of the LGB+ community that are professionals and in relationships with other professionals. These couples often don't have kids and make very good wages. While not as flamboyant as the add suggests, they would very well like the upscale electric Jag being offered, and have no problem affording one. While the new logo is reminiscent of KIA's latest offering, I don't think it will put anyone off enough not to buy it.

Looking at who owns Subaru's in my extended family, it's a young couple who have an H6 outback, another young couple with two small kids with a new Ascent and my 81yo mother with her 2009 Tribeca.
 
That's just like the short-lived redesigned Chicago Tribune from 2008 or so, when they laid off a ton of writers and replaced most articles with a giant photo and a bunch of bullet points instead of actual sentences and paragraphs. It was like having a printed copy of the mobile version of a website.
Marketing for a targeted market.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom