You bought it because of a Rock?I remember the early Infiniti commercials. Instead of a car, you saw a rock. I bought a Q45 and it was a marvelous performance sedan with a 4.5 liter dohc engine.
I think my favorite modern one is the Ford GT commercial from 2004. I still want one so bad.
Too late for Jag. That portion of previosus Saturn owners already moved to Subaru.The problem is, that customer base doesn't buy luxury cars, and particularly not Jag's. You might see one in a Subaru, Prius or old Honda Fit but this isn't a demographic rolling in money. Have you ever watched Ru Paul's "Drag Race"? These are not people with considerable quantities of disposable income that they are going to whimsically spend on quirky Indian/British luxury cars. Nor is the demographic all that large.
This seems absolutely suicidal.
The only person I know personally who owns a Jag is in the customer base they just took a scorched earth approach to: a retired HVAC business owner who traded in his Corvette for something a bit more luxurious, while still somewhat sporty. He's in his 70's.
Yes, it was beige, and solid as a rock.You bought it because of a Rock?![]()
Sure is always more to blame than meets the eye lots of times , when long time successful institutions/companies go under. Good people always suffer the fall out. Bad people from (misguided gov, greedy uncaring owners, uncapable managers, to others) it seems all too often get to escape unscathed. That is the really sad part.Yep, the death of decent cars is what I'm sad about. However, I don't think Jaguar is solely to blame.
Cafe, subsidies, and luxury buyers looking at EV
Very TRUE...This is the disingenuous part of what Jaguar are doing. They still have quite a serious problem with warranty claims and parts supply on the current cars and yet the stated intention of this new marketing campaign is to move the brand further up market with no doubt prices to match. You would think they would fix their quality control problems first. But then at the top of the market where people have more money than sense, cars can sell on image alone rather than reliability. It still has to look good quality but may sell even if it's consistently near the bottom of reliability surveys. Range Rover is a case in point.
Someone I work with has one of those. Bought it new. He says it's been rock solid.
Every time I see a Mitsubishi or Ram truck I think “Zero interest, zero down.” Instantly upside down.Infiniti's launch ads, without cars, were a necessity because they were trying to line up or hold onto a dealer and distribution network already under contract. Yeah, they might have been stupid, but the gambit worked and the brand's been successful for 35 years. Plus the brand has more panache than Nissan, which is something of a "low credit buyer" joke now. They are assuredly a Madison Ave. case study on how to launch a product when the product is unavailable.
Marketing for a targeted market.That's just like the short-lived redesigned Chicago Tribune from 2008 or so, when they laid off a ton of writers and replaced most articles with a giant photo and a bunch of bullet points instead of actual sentences and paragraphs. It was like having a printed copy of the mobile version of a website.
They also"Ford made sweeping improvements almost immediately to Jaguar cars."
When Ford can improve your cars, you are in trouble. lol