Originally Posted By: cchase
My issue is that it's my business and mine only if I want to buy unpasteurized milk or cider from a local farmer, not yours or anyone elses. And I would stand by that. I purchase unpasteurized cider every fall and will continue to do so as I believe it tastes better and is reasonably safe. If you choose not to, let it be your choice. Not the governments.
As long as your decision doesn't impact me (like not immunizing your kid), I really don't care--and I agree, it should be your choice.
But the title of this thread is ridiculous. The "despicable reason" behind banning raw milk is most likely a misguided sense of providing for public safety, not some tinfoil hat conspiracy to stop .05% of the milk trade from taking over...
And this isn't some vast federal conspiracy, as is suggested in that "article", these decisions are handled at the state level--and state representatives aren't that hard to reach. If you have an issue with it, pick up the phone.
WA state seems to have it down, IMO. You can buy raw milk, but the producers are licensed and regulated, and there's a warning label on the bottle. Those seem like reasonable requirements.
As far as govt. being in the business of food regulation though? I'm glad. I know it's popular to hate everything government, but I really don't have time to visit every meat processor, apple grower or farmer from whom I buy product (do you?), so I'm glad that collectively it's done. Food is pretty safe in this country, and we have regulation to thank for it. It's not a perfect system by any means, but I prefer it to the alternative.
So, if you really aren't happy with the raw milk situation in your state, do something about it.