Originally Posted by 14Accent
Originally Posted by GZRider
I give you props for every day you manage to keep that car on the road, I had a 96 Olds Aurora with the 4.0 variant and a 01 Caddi STS, they were higher maintenance then a girl named Brandy who works in "entertainment".
Funny, I had a '96 Aurora as well. My current STS is the only one that's given me any (engine) trouble, though. Here's my last 2, I can't believe I still have pictures of them!
My '99:
And my '94 that I bought way back when I was 20ish with a bad trans but otherwise showroom fresh:
Just for fun, here's the minty '91 Regal GS I picked up years and years ago. I really liked this one....
Yep, a 96 here as well. That was a great car, though I wonder what I would have been in for if I did not trade it in.
Originally Posted by GZRider
You know you are right, the Aurora was the better built car in my experience and the 4.0 with the revised oiling and cooling system which made it less prone to self destruction before 100k miles then early garden variety northstars. I got the Aurora for $3500 bucks with 90k miles back in 2003 when I was still a in junior year of high school and drove it 3 years to about 150-160k before headgasket went, Iand maybe spent $1500-2000 in parts to drive a reasonably powerful and comfortable car, it probably was a pretty good deal. Now the STS was 3 years old with 40k miles when I got it and I had fuel pump alternator, starter, electrical, and random misfire issues from 55k miles until I sold it at 81k miles. Only time I ever kept a car less then 50k because of the obvious depreciation hit but no amount of money was worth that [censored] Caddi leaving me stranded again. Thanks for reminding me how much I liked that Aurora, for 96 it was a pretty awesome car.
We had the L47 they nicknamed it the Shortstar.