Tesla Model 3 vs BMW M3 video

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok.

1) I guess you missed the story of the of the brand new EVs on a Kia lot in Florida that burned during the hurricane with the window stickers still in them. It's only Teslas though... Kias don't have vents, right? Batteries don't need to be vented...

2) As far as I understood on this issue some Model 3s and Model Ss have suffered from this from road impacts. I lost a transmission cooler line this way on a Jaguar.

3) F Bodies are probably the worst examples of this. My 3rd gen was a hint questionable too. Our 1996 240SX wasn't great either. I think that was due to the fact that the window didn't retract and then reseal tighter by rolling up into the seal on any of these cars. It wasn't an option on my 1991 Camaro, it had hand crank windows.
Link to the FL ev6s?
 
Daily one and tell me. That's how it's used 98% of the time and I didn't pay $80k for the styling the M3 now has. Seriously what the heck is BMW doing? They used to have some of the best cars looking cars on the market. I get having better track tuned suspension, but this whole fastest lap time stuff for cars that never see the track is kind of funny. Less M3s will see the track by percentage than trucks will tow trailers. It's like intentionally making the car worse for bragging rights. Look at Porsche with the new GT3 and GT3 Touring. They actually dialed the suspension back to a level where it still handles but became more compliant for the street. I'm too old for that fastest lap junk to a level where it makes a worse car to live with and don't have the time to spend on the track anyway. When the Tesla is 90% there for nearly half the money and makes for a better daily, the rest of it no longer makes any sense. As a weekend toy I get it, but neither of these cars are weekend toys.

I love it when people call Tesla crap. It's better than it deserves to be at its price point and the market seems to be eating it up.
You obviously never drove M3. Just bcs. suspension is good on track doesn’t mean it is bad on street. The M3 was always benchmark precisely because of that.
Numerous cars last 40 years were in Tesla’s position: AMG, Infinity, Lexus IS-F etc. “Is this vehicle that will finally take on M3?” We have seen this movie play repeatedly.
These tests are funny. Because it tells you about test. Tgey also told you to buy GR86 for track, but they forgot to tell you to buy extra rod bearings that get destroyed on track. Tests are just glimps. They were always fascinated by BMW N63 engine, but they forget to tell people what hot V8 is and what reliability problems has. Etc.
And iPad is still the crap. And yes it needs HUD as pointed above.
 
The M3P is an excellent daily. So easy to drive. No expensive services, no down time in comparison.
According to the video, the BMW suspension has very little benefit on the track and is worse as a daily driver. It is not bad, just not as good.
The M3P is simply a better car for all but a very small use case.

The Tesla tablet interface is not for everyone. At the very least, it takes getting used to. But I can tell you I do not miss traditional gauges, stalks, dials and buttons one bit.
 
Last edited:
You obviously never drove M3. Just bcs. suspension is good on track doesn’t mean it is bad on street. The M3 was always benchmark precisely because of that.
Numerous cars last 40 years were in Tesla’s position: AMG, Infinity, Lexus IS-F etc. “Is this vehicle that will finally take on M3?” We have seen this movie play repeatedly.
These tests are funny. Because it tells you about test. Tgey also told you to buy GR86 for track, but they forgot to tell you to buy extra rod bearings that get destroyed on track. Tests are just glimps. They were always fascinated by BMW N63 engine, but they forget to tell people what hot V8 is and what reliability problems has. Etc.
And iPad is still the crap. And yes it needs HUD as pointed above.
Of course I haven't driven this current generation of M3. I didn't cross shop it. I can't afford an $80k car!
 
My issue is the screen isn't in front of you. It needs a hud and gauges.
I used to say that, and for many I'm sure that's true. The car is different.
My biggest complaint is the lack of blind spot detection in the side mirrors; once you've had it you love it.
The Highland now has a little red LED in the speaker grille; pretty worthless in my experience. I was disappointed.
Now the tablet displays far more, but IMO is a poor substitute for the lack of blind spot detection mirrors.
An OTA update has greatly improved the awareness; if you blink the side of the tablet lights up red when another vehicle is near.
1731776295676.webp
 
Last edited:
On a different note. There was once a time where the tasteful aggressive looks of an M3 was baked into its overall greatness. IMO, not anymore...sadly.

View attachment 249939View attachment 249940
I’d take either of those over a new m3 or Tesla 3.

The OP video is neat, begs the question which would I rather own now and in 20 years? M3 is the answer for both.

But I’d probably take the Tesla as a driving appliance.
 
That car, as tested, was far more than $80K. Probably well over $110K.
An $80K M3 would be annihilated by the $55K M3P.
Absolutely. I'm just saying on the low end of the spectrum for M3s. I can think of a few things I'd buy for $110k over the M3 just on driving engagement alone and I wouldn't be daily driving it.
 
I’d take either of those over a new m3 or Tesla 3.

The OP video is neat, begs the question which would I rather own now and in 20 years? M3 is the answer for both.

But I’d probably take the Tesla as a driving appliance.
I'm sure many would say that. I used to drool over all the beautiful BMWs in our parking lot and German cars in general. I wanted one so bad but I had more important things to spend my money on.

No longer. The M3P is that good. And at $55 large, it is a flat out bargain in comparison. Rides better, steers better and fuels up at home. Add in cost of ownership and the BMW is one expensive car. I've heard dealership oil changes can be pretty steep!

BMW is a legendary company, period. I would suggest that if one did an objective analysis, the M3 pales in comparison to the MP3.
In 20 years the M3 would be pretty stale. The MP3 would be a far more advanced vehicle due to its tech based architecture. You "get a new car" every OTA update.
 
Last edited:
I don’t plan to buy Tesla, but I still drove them.
I make a point to not waste my time or the sales person's time driving a car I have no intention of buying. Then again with Tesla you're not doing any of that. Scheduling a test drive doesn't mean anything to someone at a service center. They're not the one selling the car. If it had been in my price range I would have strongly considered it. I looked at the Acura Integra Type S, Golf R, GTI, and while I didn't get to drive one I also considered the Civic Type R. I had a mild facination with the Hyundai Elantra N. These are cars in the price range of the Tesla once all credits are in place and it isn't the most expensive in this grouping of cars. The Integra Type S is the same price before the tax credit. BMW is not in the picture. Heck, every single one of these cars don't have the power the Tesla has.

AWD won. I really screwed up going to FWD this last time with the nature of my job. I would have considered the Golf R more strongly if there were financing incentives and I would have still paid more OTD for the car by $5k because of the $4,300 off that Tesla gave me. Then again we're talking about the Model Y Performance in my case. Even then the Model 3 Performance would have slightly edged out the Golf R with incentives even though there aren't other discounts on them, but I didn't want to lose the hatchback. The only other EV I really would have considered would have been the Hyundai Ioniq 5N, but it's $70k and I don't want to be in that price point.

I'm not saying the M3 isn't an amazing car, it's price takes it out of any consideration and as a daily driver I'm not convinced it's giving me anything as a benefit over the Tesla as a daily. Yes, I'm very aware of the fun of pops and bangs and stupid noise. It's a lot of fun, but I'm not sure that's worth $50k+ more when we all know I'm not going to track either car.
 
Absolutely. I'm just saying on the low end of the spectrum for M3s. I can think of a few things I'd buy for $110k over the M3 just on driving engagement alone and I wouldn't be daily driving it.
The M3 driving engagement offers nothing over the M3P according to this video.
 
The M3 driving engagement offers nothing over the M3P according to this video.
For me it's without question the Lotus Emira V6. I don't think you're beating the M3P in sedan form at this price point anyway if it stands up to the M3 this well. Time to go dedicated sports car at that level. I just don't see what's so special about $100k daily drivers. They're going to get miles, they'll gain some wear no matter how well they're cared for. It's not possible to not just drive the value out of it. If it's kept low miles and rarely driven, sure. If that's the case then why buy a 4 door car in the first place?
qdxe95wmvhnd1ovrx5x0


I guess I'm just not at the income level to understand burning money on expensive renditions of cars that possibly offer an incremental step up for twice the money just to park it out in the elements for 2 days at a time when I'm at work.
 
I'm sure many would say that. I used to lust after the beautiful BMWs in our parking lot and German cars in general. I wanted one so bad but I had more important things to spend my money on.

No longer. The M3P is that good. And at $55 large, it is a flat out bargain in comparison. Rides better, steers better and fuels up at home. Add in cost of ownership and the BMW is one expensive car. I've heard dealership oil changes can be pretty steep!

BMW is a legendary company, period. I would suggest that if one did an objective analysis, the M3 pales in comparison to the MP3.
In 20 years the M3 would be pretty stale. The MP3 would be a far more advanced vehicle due to its tech based architecture. You get a new car every OTA update.
Yeah we’ve heard the schpiel over and over. And I’m not a Musk or Tesla hater. And the model 3 is an impressive car.

But in 20 years the M3P will be recycled at least once over. Look at the market for used BMW M3s - perpetually strong. And regardless, the ICE will still be functional. Like it or not, a 20yo Li-ion battery is a fire hazard. And all that supposed maintenance savings is moot when Tesla has to swap the battery, if they can even do it.

Nobody can argue that full torque at zero rpm is useful, and even fun. Locomotives and electric drive ships have known that for over half a century. So you’re not telling us anything we don’t know there.

In 2044, I’d buy a 2024 M3, No way would I buy a 2024 Tesla model 3. It can’t be said any simpler than that. I couldn’t care less about obsolescence or what you might think will be better in terms of improvements. I still happily drive 72hp cars on “scary” roads. Beyond a point the laws of physics and safety come into play.
 
Yeah we’ve heard the schpiel over and over. And I’m not a Musk or Tesla hater. And the model 3 is an impressive car.

But in 20 years the M3P will be recycled at least once over. Look at the market for used BMW M3s - perpetually strong. And regardless, the ICE will still be functional. Like it or not, a 20yo Li-ion battery is a fire hazard. And all that supposed maintenance savings is moot when Tesla has to swap the battery, if they can even do it.

Nobody can argue that full torque at zero rpm is useful, and even fun. Locomotives and electric drive ships have known that for over half a century. So you’re not telling us anything we don’t know there.

In 2044, I’d buy a 2024 M3, No way would I buy a 2024 Tesla model 3. It can’t be said any simpler than that. I couldn’t care less about obsolescence or what you might think will be better in terms of improvements. I still happily drive 72hp cars on “scary” roads. Beyond a point the laws of physics and safety come into play.
The M3 would be pretty beat as well, right? IMO, neither car would be worth much.
It is not what I think about obsolescence or improvements; it is the reality of both. Improvements are good.

At the risk of being presumptive, it's possible your opinion has to do with the legendary BMW history. Apologies if this isn't accurate.
It's perfectly fair that you prefer the M3; I get that. But that does not make it a better car.

I think it's great you like your MBZ. I have 2 almost 60 year old cars and a 20-something year old pickup. But your beloved MBZ would not be preferred by the general public, same as my old cars. We are in a small minority.
All good...
 
Last edited:
The M3 would be pretty beat as well, right? IMO, neither car would be worth much.
It is not what I think about obsolescence of improvements; it is the reality of both. Improvements are good.

At the risk of being presumptive, it's possible your opinion has to do with the legendary BMW history. Apologies if this isn't accurate.
All good...
People who track vehicles are constantly on the lookout for cars that can survive constant beating and keep doing it.
Two most common vehicles? Mazda Miata and 3 series. You won’t find Lexus, Toyota and especially Tesla.
So yeah, in 20 years there will be slew of people looking for fun car and buying used M3. M3P? It will be like GTA video game from 2008.
 
Yeah we’ve heard the schpiel over and over. And I’m not a Musk or Tesla hater. And the model 3 is an impressive car.

But in 20 years the M3P will be recycled at least once over. Look at the market for used BMW M3s - perpetually strong. And regardless, the ICE will still be functional. Like it or not, a 20yo Li-ion battery is a fire hazard. And all that supposed maintenance savings is moot when Tesla has to swap the battery, if they can even do it.

Nobody can argue that full torque at zero rpm is useful, and even fun. Locomotives and electric drive ships have known that for over half a century. So you’re not telling us anything we don’t know there.

In 2044, I’d buy a 2024 M3, No way would I buy a 2024 Tesla model 3. It can’t be said any simpler than that. I couldn’t care less about obsolescence or what you might think will be better in terms of improvements. I still happily drive 72hp cars on “scary” roads. Beyond a point the laws of physics and safety come into play.
+1 FTR I'm once again liking Elon, I flip flop on that. Tesla OTOH, my view on them remains exactly the same. No thanks! Now lets see if I had to choose between a BMW, or a Tesla. BMW, it took me a millisecond to make that choice, and I'm not a BMW fan by any stretch of the imagination.
 
People who track vehicles are constantly on the lookout for cars that can survive constant beating and keep doing it.
Two most common vehicles? Mazda Miata and 3 series. You won’t find Lexus, Toyota and especially Tesla.
So yeah, in 20 years there will be slew of people looking for fun car and buying used M3. M3P? It will be like GTA video game from 2008.
I've said the M3, especially in the video's configuration is a better track car. That does not make it a better car.
Completely different use cases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom