Term Life Insurance

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Messages
69,312
Location
Everson WA - Pacific NW USA
This is where it gets weird.

I could have sworn that I did signed up for 10 years or something....maybe it was 5 years....but I just did some web surfing and WOW I can get much lower rates.

I am talking simple term insurance...but the company has changed ownership and had some lawsuit. I think it's time to change, beside the fact that I can save well over $200 per year!
 
Pablo, there's always Plan B. Don't die!
wink.gif
 
All Term Life insurance is considered "temporary isnurance" but come in several flavors.

It sounds like you were have a "Renewable Term" meaning the death benefit amount remains the same but your rates go up annual based on your current age. The most popular type of term insurance is "Level Term". Your premium will be higher than the initial Renewable Term premium, but your death benefit and premium are unchanged (level) for the entire term of the policy. The "better" policy will depend on your needs and financial goals. These are only two types of term but there are a few more variations.

It is wise of you to shop around because premiums can vary greatly but most importantly, make sure you they are in good financial standing (you want Very Strong or better rating from S&P, A.M. Best, and Moody's).

In addition to your medical history, they will want blood and urine, again. You mentioned you lost weight. This is good because underwriters use a height-to-weight chart (ie. Preferred Plus, Pref. Standard, etc.) to classify your risk.

In my experience Prudential is good about writing smokers and First Colony is good for people with a few extra pounds. For anyone (or child of a parent) with military background should take a look at USAA. That's who I have.
 
Thanks RAZL and folks.

I have to go back to when I bought this policy in the first place - when I had no life insurance - and needed some "temporary" coverage.

Bottom line - I'm starting over again.
 
Remember that life insurance doesn't insure you, it benefits those who are left alive after you die. And think about it, your wife will remarry and make it on her own. Your kids will too, after they turn 18. So, about the only reason for life ins., that I can see, is to try and help out your young kids. And that will only work if they get so much a month, rather than a lump sum.
 
What's the best deal? Any tips, other than avoiding nasty commission?

Here's my current situation - I got an ok rate like 6 years ago....an OK rate for a FAT guy. This is the kind of life insurance where a nurse comes to the house with a scale, blood pressure rig and a hypodermic for blood sample.

The rate has been creeping up as I age, but I have lost 50 pounds.....and the rate keeps creeping up....it's now a bit rediculous....

What should a good rate be for a 46 year old in great shape, per $100K?
 
How is the rate changing? Did you get an ultra-short term? I thought if you had 20yr or 30yr term or whatever, the rate was fixed for that period. Mine is or so I thought?
If you must have life insurance, this is the best option.
The other type where you can build equity in or however it works, not coming to me right now. Is a SCAM! If you have it I would advise you to re-evaluate. Research it. Really if you have common sense it's easy to figure why it's a scam. Much better ways out there to save your money.
But all insurance is a scam really. They are criminals. I hope to get to the point where I don't need any insurance. Via large 401k and IRA balances mostly. Would be nice.
 
Williar, with all respect, that's just bad advise and ignorant to say
thumbsdown.gif

I understand your message as "many people buy life insurance for the wrong reasons, and the ones that do buy, buy too much". I can agree with the first part.

In reality, most people are underinsured and/or buy the wrong type of policy. Bottom line is if someone depends on your income, they will need a source of income available to maintain their present lifestyle in the event of your death. For most people, that source is funded by life insurance.

If I died tomorrow without life insurance, my family would face financial hardship, unneeded stress (in addition to the grief of my recent death), and significant lifestyle changes. Sure, my wife might get married (nothing would make me happier than to see her taken care of) and be financially supported. But, she better start marketing herself darn fast because the emergency savings would be exhausted in about 6 (maybe 9 months if she skimps on my funeral and diapers for the baby). At the same time, she better brush up that resume to get a decent paying full time job, find adequate and affordable daycare, continue funding her retirement and our child’s college fund, sell the house and move into something more manageable for single parent, etc. And this is only touching on a “few” changes.

As for the family “blowing” the life insurance windfall, this is easily addressed through proper estate planning where you would clearly specify distribution of assets. I feel that I have taken the proper steps to insure my family’s happiness in the event of my death. I know that if and when I’m in my death bed, I won’t have to stress about their financial welfare. That’s a good feeling.
 
Razl, your advice is excellent, imho.
grin.gif


Our current governor basically got elected in part because of his background in health care management/cost control. Unfortunately, we still have a mess. Special interest seems to always be able to block any reform and the cost continue to escalate.

We allow insurers to pick only the healthy to insure and the taxpayers get stuck with the others.

It seem ridiculous in Tennessee how many people we have that are "uninsurable". They can afford coverage, but it gets turned down. It's often only because of a "few" pounds and some of these folks might live to be 100 with no major problems. We allow the insurance companies to skim what they think is the "gravy" according to their statistical analysis

Sorry for the rant and good luck Pablo.
 
XS650,

Not directly. I am licensed in the N. East, but never sold a policy or received commission from a sale and don't consider myself an insurance agent. My dad is an estate planner and I work for financial service company. I specifically deal with group benefits which may include life insurance, but primarily I deal with healthcare. I work with employers, not the employees (policyholders). Usually, it is up to us to come up with creative solutions to meet a corporate budget. Our firm gets paid either a consulting fee from the employer and/or a commission from the carrier. I receive a respectible salary but do not get bonuses or other "incentive" compensation so for me there's no inherent conflict of interest. Now, if I were selling to the general public (kitchen table style), things might be different
smile.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom