I would imagine it's rather low efficiency, but don't know.
Sadly, this and slightly longer -10004 p/n has likely been superseded going on now 20 years later.
LOL I give up. Although I did just run across a thread on here claiming that modern engines using modern oils don't even require oil filters in the first place, so...
If they are a rock catcher, then the want for them must just be a "Toyota cult" thing, lol. Bet there's zero measured efficiency data on those Toyota filters.
I have always liked the old (ca.2k) O.E. Japan /Lexus spin ons with foamed media for small filter cans. Too bad toyota typically uses 3/4"-16 threads. Wouldn't be hard to purchase a new nipple with UFP 3/4"-16 on the outside if the gasket ID is close enough. Dont know the thread on the front cover/adapter on a subaru. Bet the rally guys know.
And before that, Toyota was using a “crystal element” way of making oil filters. Instead of the usual pleats, Denso would zig-zag fold the media first and then make it into a section. More media, more surface area but more expensive.
And before that, Toyota was using a “crystal element” way of making oil filters. Instead of the usual pleats, Denso would zig-zag fold the media first and then make it into a section. More media, more surface area but more expensive.
I remember the Toyota dealer back in the day with a cutaway of one of those compared to a fram cutaway. I thought it was a good looking filter. Ran one of those zigzag jobs on my 86 Camry