Single Point of FailureWhat is a SPOF?
Although I'd argue that in the case of Tesla one could call him Significant Personality out Front.
Single Point of FailureWhat is a SPOF?
Thing about subsidies for made in USA only is they would violate the trade agreement we have with other countries (Japan, Mexico, Canada, Euro), and they would have the legal retaliation right to our farm products. It won't work politically.I am not real big on subsidies, even though America is full of them.
But if you wanna, it should be any EV, not just Tesla...
For persons earning up to $70K (or whatever) and only made in America cars.
Single Point of Failure
Although I'd argue that in the case of Tesla one could call him Significant Personality out Front.
I have had the incredible experience of seeing high tech companies morph, change and change dramatically when Silicon Valley CEOs go and others take over.I have heard from a reliable source that Tesla has a secret lab that is working on cloning Elon.
Just kidding.
But what makes anyone think that Elon is not fully aware that he is the "SPOF" and is not grooming someone to replace him should the need arise ?
He's a pretty smart guy ya know.....
Apple did whither when Sculley fired Jobs.Based on that theory one could state the case that Apple should have whithered after Steve Jobs passed? In fact the opposite happened as Tim Cook has led Apple in brilliant fashion.
Maybe that’s where Apple and Tesla diverge? Does Tesla have a solid management lineup in case the unforeseen should happen? That is actually part of the CEO’s job.
Based on that theory one could state the case that Apple should have whithered after Steve Jobs passed? In fact the opposite happened as Tim Cook has led Apple in brilliant fashion.
Maybe that’s where Apple and Tesla diverge? Does Tesla have a solid management lineup in case the unforeseen should happen? That is actually part of the CEO’s job.
If you use the term significant... then the future success depends on the quality of the follow-on leader.
If someone truly is a Single Point of Failure, future failure is more likely.
Wasn't Jobs ousted the first time? If that was the case (and I don't really recall) he wouldn't have had time to groom/prepare his successor.
I believe when he knew his time on Earth was coming to an end, he had the opportunity to choose someone who he would groom/prepare to continue his vision.
I believe Cook was Jobs' pick, and was more likely to succeed compared to his first involuntary departure.
Has Elon Musk set up people for a succession plan should anything happen to him? Seems like much of what surrounds him is a cult of personality. So are Tesla and other ventures set up for success should he leave or be forced out? Seems Apple wasn't the first time they ousted Jobs, but the second time around, Jobs had Cook around since the late 1990s and recommended him to the board.
One might argue that the reason Jobs/Apple was so much better the second time under his leadership was in fact Tim Cook's doing.
They are different kind of leaders.Based on that theory one could state the case that Apple should have whithered after Steve Jobs passed? In fact the opposite happened as Tim Cook has led Apple in brilliant fashion.
Maybe that’s where Apple and Tesla diverge? Does Tesla have a solid management lineup in case the unforeseen should happen? That is actually part of the CEO’s job.
When you get an $3.4 billion in local government grants and another $20 billion (last year) in government subsidies/vouchers/property tax exemptionsAmazon approaching $3600 after today earnings report, hopefully it splits soon.
As I said previously, that's a very very small fraction of their own investment. i.e. AWS invest 9B a quarter, and that's not including those retail investment they made. Gov cloud also is not a major portion of their client base, i.e. Snapchat alone were spending 1B a year on AWS service.When you get an $3.4 billion in local government grants and another $20 billion (last year) in government subsidies/vouchers/property tax exemptions
it’s hard not to make profit
income isn’t profitAs I said previously, that's a very very small fraction of their own investment. i.e. AWS invest 9B a quarter, and that's not including those retail investment they made. Gov cloud also is not a major portion of their client base, i.e. Snapchat alone were spending 1B a year on AWS service.
LOL you seriously believe they only make $5 in profit? and $20 gov cash is all profit and no cost? I though government buying stuff and services still need to pay instead of robbing vendors blind.income isn’t profit
Investment/ R&D also isn’t profit
They make $5 billion in actual profit in a quarter
so yeah $20 billion in government cash is a thing when your “profit” tracks government kickbacks
I wonder how many additional carmakers will need fewer if not no emissions credits from Tesla.I don't think TSLA is making money on selling cars. IIRC, their profit for the last quarter was less than the income from selling mileage credits to other automakers.
From CNBC, "Net profit reached a quarterly record of $438 million on a GAAP basis, and the company recorded $518 million in revenue from sales of regulatory credits during the period. It also recorded a $101 million positive impact from sales of bitcoin during the quarter."
So TSLA is not making money building and selling cars. If you take out the speculation on bitcoin as well as the sales of regulatory credits and TSLA is $181 million in the red.
So while they clever, they are not really making their money on the sales of cars. Their money is made on trading.
Not saying that's bad, just suggesting people understand where any profits are really coming from.
If other automakers have lesser need for such credits, what does that do to TSLA?