Factorial designs can be your friend at times.....
SS mesh filter conversation
- Thread starter tom slick
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,799
Originally Posted By: edhackett
Not creative, scientific.
I can't help it Gary. It's what I do. I'm a research scientist. They pay me good money to look at data acquisition methodology and insure that all variables are accounted for and subsequently a control for that variable incorporated into the data collection.
Ed
Great ..excellent ..but this still doesn't establish any significant difference in a "continuum" (continuous cycle) of filtration. That is, any two SEQUENTIAL (to 99 44/100% eliminate media fatigue) snap shots (assume 100% of sump passing through the filter) should be statistically identical to within .0000000000000000000000000x % (stretching reality out to a ridiculous extreme). It would have to be random chance that a larger particle could be found in any ONE snap shot. That is, THAT particle just happened to find THAT pore that allowed it through at THAT moment.
Not creative, scientific.
I can't help it Gary. It's what I do. I'm a research scientist. They pay me good money to look at data acquisition methodology and insure that all variables are accounted for and subsequently a control for that variable incorporated into the data collection.
Ed
Great ..excellent ..but this still doesn't establish any significant difference in a "continuum" (continuous cycle) of filtration. That is, any two SEQUENTIAL (to 99 44/100% eliminate media fatigue) snap shots (assume 100% of sump passing through the filter) should be statistically identical to within .0000000000000000000000000x % (stretching reality out to a ridiculous extreme). It would have to be random chance that a larger particle could be found in any ONE snap shot. That is, THAT particle just happened to find THAT pore that allowed it through at THAT moment.
- Status
Similar threads
