Speed limit enforcement

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:

I have yet to wreck in snow at 25k a year and iirc, you don't even get snow in your parts there Mori.

Hmm, I usually don't walk from SF to Tahoe. I've also lived in the North East for a few years, and you should know how bad winter can be there. For the first few years of having a permit, I drove five months out if the year under conditions like this (without causing a wreck, too):

 -


 -


 -


If you say you can always go the posted speed limit safely in adverse conditions, please stay on PA roads.
wink.gif
 
Tell me about it. I crossed the country in a U-Haul truck going West on I-80 with a blizzard trailing and sometimes passing me until I hit Colorado. I'm sure I can find a picture...
grin.gif
 
Gary,

That is fog..merely fog...when it arrives in The City it is something to see...and seeing mori's pix reminds me of how quickly the weather can deteriorate on I-80 heading to Tahoe...
 
I thought about making a humorous reference in relation to that event...and decided not the right thing to do!
cool.gif
 
"And I'd also like to know why people who want to take the exit off the freeway as I'm trying to enter the freeway will always speed up, cut in front of me and exit, rather than slow down and let me on as they are going off? "
-----------------------------------------------------------

MarkC. Yes, I think we would all like to know.
 
It is the result of a little known psychological disorder designated Youthfully Acquired Freeway Aggression Syndrome (YAFAS). It is a little known and studied phenomenon, but it does appear to be more pronounced in drivers who, as they were growing up, spent an inordinate amount of time in line at theme parks.
 
quote:

Originally posted by moribundman:
Tell me about it. I crossed the country in a U-Haul truck going West on I-80 with a blizzard trailing and sometimes passing me until I hit Colorado. I'm sure I can find a picture...
grin.gif


I also crossed the country in winter, pulling a U-Haul trailer behind my Jeep. I took the more southerly I-70 route a ways, then hung a right at Denver and came through Wyoming and Idaho. There was ice and snow all through these states, and heavy snow in the Blue Mountains in Oregon. Fun.
grin.gif
 
A couple of years ago, there was a suggestion in the local paper that a radar should cause traffic lights to turn red ahead of a speeder. I don't know what happened to that idea or what if there were no traffic lights to start with.

I was driving in Berkeley the other day and came across several sets of speed bumps that had sections deliberatley missing just where a car's wheels could pass through. Was it to discourage low-riders or what?
 
Auto-Union's, I too have noticed how well snow rated tires handle and accelerate in the snow and ice. I've equated it to driving with all-season tires in heavy rain.

Sure you can do 80-90mph with good snow tires in foul weather…the only problem is if you need to stop quickly. The fun factor deteriorates exponentially for every extra foot it would normally take you to stop
wink.gif
 
I've lived in snow country (Minnesota, Vermont, and now Montana) all my life and have been driving for 46 years. NOBODY can drive safely at the speed limit on snow. People who think they can are deluding themselves and are a danger to themselves and other drivers. And the higher the speed limit the higher the danger. Its a simple fact that you do not have the turning ability and control that you have on dry pavement and can't stop as quick, even with studded snow tires, which by the way I always run in the winter.
 
Yep,

I have to say that I find it funny when people in SUVs blast by at high rates of speed onthe highway in poor condtions... then end up in tthe guardrail or median.

I run (non-studded) snow tires, and love them. They giv eme excellent control and a feeling ofsafety, but even when in my saab or 4x4 with snow tires, which are great in those conditions, there is no substitute for slowing down in bad conditions.

JMH
 
quote:

Originally posted by Tosh:
A couple of years ago, there was a suggestion in the local paper that a radar should cause traffic lights to turn red ahead of a speeder. I don't know what happened to that idea or what if there were no traffic lights to start with.

Guess they'll have to install a red light camera to catch all of the people who blow through it, too.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Benzadmiral:
It uised to be the rule in Loozyana, at least three decades ago when I was learning to drive, that drivers on a freeway or interstate shared responsibility with merging drivers for getting the merging drivers on safely. You weren't supposed to fight them, you were supposed to see they got on safely. (Which I still do.)

That's still the rule here in MI. BOTH drivers are responsible for merging safely and either one or both can potentially be ticketed for failing to do so. A lot of people have the mistaken impression that the people already on the freeway have the right of way. IMO, that just makes things more dangerous.
 
Leave space between yourself and the vehicle ahead of you? What? Are you serious? This is an invitation for someone to move into the space. You know, why waste it, right?
Every day I have some jack ease him/herself into the space bewteen my Jeep and the car in front of me, whether that space is 20 feet or 8.
 
I really hate it when somebody is behind me in a 2-3 ton truck so close I can't see anything but the grill. If the local goverments need money, they could easily write more tickets for following too closely than speeding. A simple still camera is cheaper than a radar gun.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Tosh:
A couple of years ago, there was a suggestion in the local paper that a radar should cause traffic lights to turn red ahead of a speeder. I don't know what happened to that idea

After thinking about it: I expect they found out that traffic controllers just don't work that way.

There is no input that forces them to unconditionally turn red, except the preemption input and that turns EVERYTHING red except for the approach the preemption is from, which gets a green. That would really mess traffic up if they tried to use that to slow down speeders, not to mention that if they WERE using preemption for emergency vehicles it would result in big problems because only one approach gets a preempt at a time and all others are locked out.

Now, it is possible, I supose, if they're running a 170 or 2070 controller to use custom firmware to do what they want without having ot use the preempt input..but they would have to find someone to program it for them. (Generally, though, the only reason to be using 170 or 2070 controllers is if the signals are coordinated and having them turn red for speeders totally defeats the purpose of coordination).

NEMA controllers, the most commonly used type, don't have open architecture and therefore cannot have their firmware altered except by the manufacturer, so the preempt input is the only option for these.

If they're still using an electro-mechanical controller (and I somehow suspect that any place that would seriously consider turning the light red for speeders probably is still using one), they'll have to upgrade to modern signal hardware to get a preempt input, which costs real money for which they probably have more important things to spend it on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom