Spark Plug Replacement Intervals - Why?

Again - I see no drop in mileage. This would obviously be the first indication of electrode burn-back, and it doesn’t seem to be happening.

I have a degree in mechanical engineering. I get that things wear out - but I also know that they give indications that they’re wearing out. I don’t accept replacing a widget that’s still fully functional just because somebody put a replacement interval in a manual.

I would prefer to replace them at a convenient time for me, and not find out they're no good half way up the Brenner pass. I'd at least check the plugs around interval time.
 
I have 176,000 miles on my Civic and it’s still got the original plugs. Engine runs smoothly and still gets over 60 MPG on a lot of my drives so I’m pretty confident that they are still doing their job perfectly. At this point they might already be difficult to remove so I might as well just keep going! I recently talked with another 2.0 Civic owner who has 250k on his plugs and they are still going strong. Honda uses NGK laser iridium plugs
 
I didn’t come here to argue, I came here to get a reason besides “the manual says so”.

Okay, so the coils will run hotter - is that necessarily going to kill them sooner? Will it manifest itself in some other way than a drop in fuel economy? Is there some other indication of worn plugs that is readily apparent?
Because it's preventive maintenance.

It's cheaper to replace 4 plugs at 80K-100K than to also wear your coil packs from increased load to jump the larger gap.

You might not see a drop now, but are you recreating the exact conditions? Ambient temps, warm up time, idle time, traffic, making the same green lights in traffic, etc.

Why risk it? Keep your engine operating as efficiently as possible. I replace my plugs and upstream sensor(s) at 80-100K to maintain peak efficiency.

Plugs wear out, just like tires, brakes, belts, etc.
 
I didn’t come here to argue, I came here to get a reason besides “the manual says so”.

Okay, so the coils will run hotter - is that necessarily going to kill them sooner? Will it manifest itself in some other way than a drop in fuel economy? Is there some other indication of worn plugs that is readily apparent?
How long do you run your engine oil in this vehicle before changing?
 
A pertinent fact that's missing from this thread is that Mazda calls for a spark plug change at 40,000 miles for its 2.5L turbo engine, compared to a much more reasonable 75,000 miles for the non-turbo version of the same engine. So the OP's question seems even more important since 40,000 miles seems an absurdly small interval for a spark plug change. I've been wondering this myself since I have a Mazda6 turbo with 37,000 miles.
 
I’ve seen some engines run well on some severely worn plugs. My only concern is when the plug can no longer be removed without damaging the threads in the cylinder head. A simple job turns into a nightmare very quickly.
 
I would follow mfg's suggestions myself. Why is it 45k on the BMW N54 (seems very soon), and 120k on the Lexus 3UZ-FE? I am not sure and I just did them when I reached those mileages. 45k is soon to me but I figured engineers have a reason and it's programmed into the car on the dash as well (CBS). I did choose to go with OEM Bosch not OE BMW. And Lexus I did amazon (ouch!) aftermarket! Both cars are fine.

I get neglecting it if not DIY. I heard it can get very expensive on transverse mounted V-6's. Like $800+ from what I've heard.
 
A pertinent fact that's missing from this thread is that Mazda calls for a spark plug change at 40,000 miles for its 2.5L turbo engine, compared to a much more reasonable 75,000 miles for the non-turbo version of the same engine. So the OP's question seems even more important since 40,000 miles seems an absurdly small interval for a spark plug change. I've been wondering this myself since I have a Mazda6 turbo with 37,000 miles.
OP says he has 140K on the original plugs?
I have a 2019 Mazda CX-5 with a 2.5 L turbo engine that has 140,000 on the factory spark plugs, and is still going strong.
 
Again - I see no drop in mileage. This would obviously be the first indication of electrode burn-back, and it doesn’t seem to be happening.

I have a degree in mechanical engineering. I get that things wear out - but I also know that they give indications that they’re wearing out. I don’t accept replacing a widget that’s still fully functional just because somebody put a replacement interval in a manual.
But that is the point being made - you will get no indications that they are wearing out until they take something else (like the coils) with them.

They might be fine. I did the plugs (iridium) on the Tundra at 80,000 miles and they looked great. (Edit - the gap was greater, they had worn a bit, but the electrode ends were still sharp and the gap wasn’t too bad)

Still, I am glad I did them, because they were nearing 10 years old, and eventually, galvanic corrosion could seize them in place. Once I’ve done all the other work to get them out, I am not putting used plugs back in. Here are the Tundra plugs, old and new:

IMG_3543.webp


I’ve seen plugs at their recommended interval be completely worn out, too.

Here is a completely worn out set of of Iridium plugs, that was in service for less than the factory interval, shown next to a new plug.

No obvious symptoms yet.

IMG_0265.webp


So, which are yours?

Neither of these had your “mechanical engineer signs of failure” - but that last set was putting more stress on the coils and the car did run better with the new set in place.
 
Last edited:
Why not do them if they’re easy? Riding around on old spark plugs is like trusting your fuel minder saying you have 50 miles left and you’re 30 miles from a gas station. You’re probably ok but why put yourself in that position to begin with. I subtract 20% from what my manual says. Instead of an air filter change @25k, I do it at 20. The plugs were supposed to be done @100, I did them @80. Not to mention that removing a plug only gets harder the longer it’s in there.
 
Back
Top Bottom