Selecting a Potential "Forever" Vehicle

The new Chevy Bolt which has an LFP battery, a new or used Toyota RAV4 hybrid, or a used GMT800 (99-06) Chevy Tahoe… I know those are three vastly different vehicles but those three will probably be the longest lasting stuff on the road compared to anything else you can buy today…
 
As has been said every time you mention how uncomfortable they are, it is pointed out that comfort is entirely subjective. There are actual owners here, including the wife and I, who don't agree.

As for power, it moves far better than the 3rd gen 4Runner I had, or the FZJ 80 Landcruiser, or the SR5 4wd Extra-cab pickup. We do have more comfortable vehicles, with far more power. But in the context of the question of this thread, I believe our 5th gen 4Runner would be the most trouble-free of our vehicles over the long haul. Next would be the RAM Dually. But the emissions system will very likely become problematic sooner.

One thing is for sure, it's a good thing there are a large variety of vehicles for people to choose from. It would be pretty boring if only one vehicle were made.
I have had one as well...that is why I can voice my view on it. Glad you like those flat rock hard seats. In the context of this thread-one has to mention comfort-in a "forever vehicle".
 
Funny you should mention that. I am in my late 40s. I did a rough guestimate on how many miles l have left given my family history. At my current annual mileage l have around 400k.
How much can you invest into the vehicle upon purchase, and how much in expenses can you set aside going forward.
 
I have had one as well...that is why I can voice my view on it. Glad you like those flat rock hard seats. In the context of this thread-one has to mention comfort-in a "forever vehicle".

Nobody said you couldn't voice your opinion. What I said, and have said many times in the past, is that comfort is subjective. What you like is not necessarily what others like.

But yes, we think the seats are comfortable and supportive.

There are firmer seats in four of our other vehicles, and they all have far more power than the 4Runner. But none of those, can venture onto the 4wd trails that we also like to explore. That's where the 4Runner shines. It's fine on paved roads, not the best of course, but more than acceptable. But it can keep going when you reach a 4wd trail that needs 4wd, low-range, axle articulation, a smaller size for tight trails, good break-over angle and ground clearance, and reliability.
 
I have been thinking about my next and ideally last vehicle.

My goals are longevity, ease/cost of repair, I do not want cylinder deactivation, comfort(soft ride and ease of entry), and utility (cargo space/seating capacity). I have always purchased used and l would plan to in this case as well. Purchase price and value is a big consideration.

My current list is:
Sienna
2012 or older Pathfinder
Nissan Armada
Sequoia
GX460

Are their any other vehicles that should be considered? I have only driven a Sienna so maybe the others do not fit my criteria.

Please share your thoughts
My next vehicle purchase will potentially be my last as well; at least I'm approaching it with that mindset. New or used, I've pretty much narrowed it down to something from Lexus, Toyota, Honda, Mazda, or Subaru. I've owned Toyota, Honda, and Subaru. Affordable quality, reliability, and easy to work on or have worked on. Each has some models I really like that would meet my wants and needs. A used Lexus in good condition is looking better and better. That's just my opinion, and to each his own. There is no wrong answer.
 
Nobody is mentioning ergonomics-it's funny how that works on here. This website has many "mature folks" on it. It sounds like the OP could be one. We are more concerned about how easy it is to replace a water pump-than to be comfortable/ingress/egress in a vehicle. Because with the exception of the Sienna-none of his choices are comfortable vehicles. JMHO. If I "had to buy" one of his body one frame choices-it would be the GX460. But reviews state that thing also lumbers along.
Good points and I am guilty of being in your first category. Ease of repair is more important to me than daily comfort.
 
I tend drive cars into the ground. I have had 5 cars in my 32 years of driving. Between my last cars, my Accord and my previous Regal l have had them for 24 years (and counting).
2011-2015 Nissan Armada. Will outlast you with two cheap basic things done, outside of regular maintenance.
- Spray the rear subframe with Fluid Film every couple years, or the whole underside annually if in rust-prone state.
- Add an auxiliary ATF cooler, instead of the factory in-radiator unit.

With these two things done you get yourself a very capable, reliable, and powerful Behemoth. Some people start screaming about MPG, but it's literally just as thirsty as any other SUV in its class. Our 2014 Armada 4x4 gets 16-17MPG average, and 19-20MPG highway. The only reason why people bring up MPG when they hear "Nissan Armada", is because there is simply nothing else to complain about with that engine.
Anyways, that's my humble recommendation, as a 33 year old with 15 year driving history and 29th car in ownership.
 
Actually you can buy a Lexus LX of same year for the less money

Basically a Land Cruiser with the Lexus badging

Land Cruiser cult following keeps the prices up

My ‘03 LX MSRP was $67K
Right, I have one, an 09 LX570

I would go LC over LX for longevity......no AHC system. Cheaper repair. Agree on lower price on LX. I love the AHC system, and the fit and finish of interior is better.
 
My sister's boyfriend has a 5th gen and I spent a lot of time in it. To say the fuel consumption is bad would be an understatement. He's happy to see 18 mpg on trips. :LOL:

It was a surprisingly cheap feeling vehicle all around but that means it should last indefinitely. Me and Toyota seats don't get along either. I don't care about MPG though what I did care about was it seemed it kicked up a lot of wind and road noise at speed. I was kind of surprised about that and would have to address it accordingly as I spend way too much time in vehicles to be dealing with that. I would need a different tow vehicle as some of my trailers are well over the 5k limit they have. But if I needed someting point and shoot out of the box it'd be near the top of my list.
 
Another to consider is the 2nd generation (2008 - 2013) Toyota Highlander. Have your choice of 4 cyl., V6 or Hybrid engines. The 4 and V6 came with the excellent 5 speed auto transmission in FWD or 4WD. Easy to get in and out of, comfortable seats with plenty of interior room. They are very well built and relatively easy to work on. I owned a 2008 V6 and put 200,000 trouble free miles on it before I sold it. Had plenty of power and averaged 24 mpg with mixed driving.
 
How much can you invest into the vehicle upon purchase, and how much in expenses can you set aside going forward.
Obviously as cheaply as l can. I don't want to purchase a vehicle that needs a ton of work (unless it is insanely cheap). As far as costs going forward, l would hope to cover repairs and maintenance... That would be my goal anyway.

I don't need the car right now and so l would have plenty of time to find one l would like. From my non expert opinion and at first glance the Armada seems to suffer the highest amount of depreciation. Followed by the Pathfinder, and the LX460. The Sequoia and the Sienna are propped up by the Toyota tax. Also given the current trajectory of gas prices l might be able to get one of those vehicles much cheaper.

@slacktide_bitog... I just looked at Transit Connects and l seen many with over 3 and 400k miles. I guess l really have to consider those too. They tend to be much cheaper and they can apparently go the distance.
 
The GX 460 that doesn't have ultra high miles at a decent price that isn't beat up is hard to find. Good luck on that one. The Sequoia is a piece of garbage-yes even the older ones.

GX460s are ultimate suburban soccer mom mall crawlers. Pretty easy to find one that isn't beat up. My local Lexus dealer has a few CPO 23's on the lot right now. But you are going to pay good money for them.

They are also better than a 5th gen 4R in almost every way. Except for the stupid side swinging barn door.
 
Obviously as cheaply as l can. I don't want to purchase a vehicle that needs a ton of work (unless it is insanely cheap). As far as costs going forward, l would hope to cover repairs and maintenance... That would be my goal anyway.

I don't need the car right now and so l would have plenty of time to find one l would like. From my non expert opinion and at first glance the Armada seems to suffer the highest amount of depreciation. Followed by the Pathfinder, and the LX460. The Sequoia and the Sienna are propped up by the Toyota tax. Also given the current trajectory of gas prices l might be able to get one of those vehicles much cheaper.

@slacktide_bitog... I just looked at Transit Connects and l seen many with over 3 and 400k miles. I guess l really have to consider those too. They tend to be much cheaper and they can apparently go the distance.
I'm asking for a price. Up to how much. Without that I really can't help you, and neither can anyone else here.

The fact that you say 'cheap' twice in the first sentence makes me think that you're really focusing on the wrong variable.
 
I'm asking for a price. Up to how much. Without that I really can't help you, and neither can anyone else here.

The fact that you say 'cheap' twice in the first sentence makes me think that you're really focusing on the wrong variable.
Fair enough. Of the vehicles listed, l have seen prices listed as low as 6000$ up to 20k$. I am pretty confident l can find a vehicle that is good at 15k$ but l prefer to be around 12k$ or less. As l have said, l am not in a hurry and so l can be a little selective.
 
I'm asking for a price. Up to how much. Without that I really can't help you, and neither can anyone else here.

The fact that you say 'cheap' twice in the first sentence makes me think that you're really focusing on the wrong variable.
My dad always said l wanted a car that's free, needs no repairs, and runs on water... So l guess l might be aiming a little high.
 
If I had to pick a forever vehicle, it'd be either my 3.6 Wrangler or 4.4 LR3. Both have drivetrains known for going 300k+ easily. Wrangler slightly more off road capable but less spacious, LR3 is exceptionally great on road and off road, and for towing. I don't think anything else exists with the blend of performance. Both are easy to work on. Can't beat ease of entry on the LR3, can lower the air suspension so it's lower than most crossovers, and then raise it back up. Have spent less on maintaining the air suspensions 240k miles than I have on upgrading a normal suspension on my other vehicles, and they still don't ride as nice. Any issues with either are well documented.
 
Back
Top Bottom