Can anyone answer here when tires become too expensive to justify minimizing death? Is is $600 for a set? $700? Like $600 is OK, but $700? Hmmm, maybe I should just increase probability of accident by adding 50ft to stopping distance in wet.
My dad had an accident where the reason he did not end up in river were four Good Year Ultra Grip 6+ tires. They were best thing after sliced bread in Europe at that time.the rock slid from a hill and hit his right/passanger side and obliterated suspension in front wheel, cutting strut like a razor. He lost brakes of course or ability to steer.
The only reason car did not go into river were tires. They three functional wheels stayed straight although they left black marks as tires were obviously struggling to stay on course.
Another instance is when I hit kid on the bike some 25yrs ago. I was driving on this small road with bunch of houses on the side. Kid just jumped on the road and I pressed brakes obviously as hard as possible. However I had set of Hankook’s that were new a ok, but at this point ready for replacement and I had Michelins on order. In the end I managed to hit him in the rear tire throwin him on a pile of sand. He just had few bruises. Me on other hand needed two years to emotionally recover from that.
After that, I might try some tires, but choice in 99% of cases end up with: Michelin, Bridgestone, Continental and Pirelli (I lost confidence in GY here in the US).
Edit: just to add, my vehicle stopped maybe 10ft after hitting bike. So, think about that. For example, braking distance between Continental Terrain Contact and BFG Trail Terrain is more than 40ft in wet.