Shimano makes more money selling you a new brake set up as compared to a set of
o rings.
o rings.
Campy does not sell MTB oriented stuff so that's why they are a non starter for me. Besides the sram stuff on my road bike has worked well for 10 years now.I've rebuilt my ~'01 era Campy shifters. Total cost for both in parts was $100, and $30 of that was brake hoods!
Shimano has NEVER provided parts or pretended to have any interest in doing so.
Campy's stuff is amazing and they sell you parts....I've never fully understood "our" fixation on Shimano and SRAM, as a nation.
I'm still running Record from ~01 on my Serotta.... although the new electric shift stuff is calling my name.....the prices aren't
Looks like it's harder to get parts after '09:
Campagnolo Small Parts (1998-2008) — Branford Bike
branfordbike.com
Got a link to an online retailer or manufacturer's webpage for the item that you bought?The rear Shimano hydraulic brake caliper on Jr's winter bike (single-speed, 29" studded tires) was leaking. I removed it and took it apart. It's a very simple design, single-piston, with mineral oil serving as the hydraulic fluid. The cylinder and piston looked fine, leaving the O-ring as the culprit. It's different from any O-ring I've ever seen before, though; rather than being round in cross-section, it's square. Nothing like that in my collection.
I did a fair bit of research online, and it looks like replacement O-rings are not available anywhere at any price. So, I bought a new caliper from my closest local bike shop. But they don't sell just the caliper; I had to buy the entire assembly - caliper, brake hose, master cylinder, and brake lever.
Disk brakes are vastly superior than rim brakes. Most designs are pretty solid if you do your maintenance. A little research goes a long way. I couldn't go back to rim brakes on my mountain bike, it would be a giant leap backwards. 😁Got a link to an online retailer or manufacturer's webpage for the item that you bought?
I am adding this story to my list of reasons to not buy a bicycle with disc brakes.
My Norco Bigfoot had Chang Star cantilever brakes, and a 3 x 5 drivetrain - hot stuff in 1984.It's becoming pretty common, my Norco bigfoot has them too, came with them.
I saw similar in O-rings on distributor shafts - the first time I saw on like that, I assumed it was intentional!I replaced the o-ring on the distributer shaft on out 1965 Olds 4-4-2. The original o-ring looked flat, sorta square.
I had never seen anything like that...
It was the 50 years of use, hrat cycles, etc. Rock hard.
This looks pretty much like the assembly I bought from my LBS. No packaging, just secured with a cable tie. I only used the caliper itself.Got a link to an online retailer or manufacturer's webpage for the item that you bought?
I am adding this story to my list of reasons to not buy a bicycle with disc brakes.
My Norco Bigfoot had Chang Star cantilever brakes, and a 3 x 5 drivetrain - hot stuff in 1984.
I saw similar in O-rings on distributor shafts - the first time I saw on like that, I assumed it was intentional!
It's good to see that the Bigfoot lives on! Mine was at the low end of bike-shop mountain bikes at the time. I paid C$425. Often regretted not going for the Sasquatch for C$600 - much lighter with better components. By the next year, the Bigfoot was greatly improved, and cheaper. But overall mine was a good bike - I rode it until 2002, when I bought the Rocky Mountain Fusion.I see they've recycled that name then, LOL!
Yes, but they make less money if I replace my brakes with something I can get parts for. I'm sure they take all of this into account when deciding whether or not to sell replacement parts.Shimano makes more money selling you a new brake set up as compared to a set of
o rings.
It's good to see that the Bigfoot lives on! Mine was at the low end of bike-shop mountain bikes at the time. I paid C$425. Often regretted not going for the Sasquatch for C$600 - much lighter with better components. By the next year, the Bigfoot was greatly improved, and cheaper. But overall mine was a good bike - I rode it until 2002, when I bought the Rocky Mountain Fusion.
The Bigfoot sat for a few years, and then my son converted it into a single-speed fixi winter bike. He rode it hard for a few years until the frame finally broke.
Norco appears to have come way up in quality since then. Enjoy yours!
The Bigfoot's a fatty now? Wow! Mine was an early mountain bike - the 2.125" tires it came with were considered crazy fat at the time.I do! It's my first fatty and strikes me as quite light and uses pretty good components. Not sure what I'm going to go with for tires once these ones are cooked, but I've got some time yet. It's a very leisurely ride, as I'm sure you are well aware, so much different from traditional mountain biking.
I just assumed you knew that, lol!The Bigfoot's a fatty now? Wow! Mine was an early mountain bike - the 2.125" tires it came with were considered crazy fat at the time.
Enjoy fat biking! If I could only keep one bike, it would be my fatty.
Thanks, this is a good resource! My measurements seem to indicate that it's 25 mm O.D. and 21 mm I.D. with a 2 mm thickness.McMaster-Carr has them. It's 26x2mm: https://www.mcmaster.com/rubber-o-r...-buna-n-o-rings/system-of-measurement~metric/
^^^ Is that a California fire break ^^^