- Joined
- Dec 20, 2024
- Messages
- 1,674
So I was diving down rabbit holes - a favorite hobby of mine, and ended up torturing a few poor artificial brains online with random questions.
Namely - why would a manufacturer's TSB pertaining to a warranty engine replacement explicitly state "Fill wih synthetic ILSAC GF6" (basically - the synthetic recommended in the user manual) - wouldn't something like Motul 10W40 Break-in oil be better (note that this one is technically SL) ?
The answers were interesting. While one of the artificial gizmos said basically "Hey, the Motul is perfect for that, go through the ring sealing break-in procedure then dump it quickly, before 1000 miles"). the other one went full blown ballistic.
And it went into details that I am 110% sure it pulled out of its electronic behind. Stuff about what process they go through on the bench, etc etc etc. When I asked for specifics on that one - it went evasive.
"No no no, you should not do it, remanufactured engines that come in warranty packages are NOT rebuilt engines by a mom and pop shop, they are tested on bench, the rings get mostly sealed while on bench, you're just gonna make things worse, blah blah".
Which slightly puzzles me. While I'm absolutely sure that the manufacturers know what they're doing, I also strongly suspect that they'll never take the risk of a client messing up things with break-in oil (like keeping it for too long), vs the risks of starting with full synth on day one - hence the instructions.
NOTE: My logic goes that manufacturers won't be rebuilding waranted engies themselves, but would subcontract this. So a reman is not a brand new engine in my book. Or am I wrong ?
Thoughts ?
Thanks
Namely - why would a manufacturer's TSB pertaining to a warranty engine replacement explicitly state "Fill wih synthetic ILSAC GF6" (basically - the synthetic recommended in the user manual) - wouldn't something like Motul 10W40 Break-in oil be better (note that this one is technically SL) ?
The answers were interesting. While one of the artificial gizmos said basically "Hey, the Motul is perfect for that, go through the ring sealing break-in procedure then dump it quickly, before 1000 miles"). the other one went full blown ballistic.
And it went into details that I am 110% sure it pulled out of its electronic behind. Stuff about what process they go through on the bench, etc etc etc. When I asked for specifics on that one - it went evasive.
"No no no, you should not do it, remanufactured engines that come in warranty packages are NOT rebuilt engines by a mom and pop shop, they are tested on bench, the rings get mostly sealed while on bench, you're just gonna make things worse, blah blah".
Which slightly puzzles me. While I'm absolutely sure that the manufacturers know what they're doing, I also strongly suspect that they'll never take the risk of a client messing up things with break-in oil (like keeping it for too long), vs the risks of starting with full synth on day one - hence the instructions.
NOTE: My logic goes that manufacturers won't be rebuilding waranted engies themselves, but would subcontract this. So a reman is not a brand new engine in my book. Or am I wrong ?
Thoughts ?
Thanks
Last edited: