Rank these synthetics in order....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Cooper
I know some of you hate these types of threads....so don't reply if you don't like it. For the rest of us who like to see what others think.

Lets asume they are all xw30 weights you can buy off of any auto parts store shelf. Rank these synthetic oils in order from what you think is best to what you think is worst. If you want, list why.

Here is my order.


1. Pennzoil Platinum
2. Q Synthetic
3. Castrol Syntec, (mostly because of GC)
4. Mobil 1
5. Valvoline Maxlife Synthetic
6. Valvoline Synpower
7. Royal Purple


Here is mine:

1. Pennzoil Platinum
1. Pennzoil Platinum
1. Pennzoil Platinum
1. Pennzoil Platinum
1. Pennzoil Platinum
 
Originally Posted By: JonnyHotcakes
I've always been under the impression that Royal Purple was top notch stuff. I did a few searches and I'm surprised to not find much info at all, and what is is negative.

Really surprising. The stuff is praised endlessly on some other forums I've visited.


Exactry.
 
Originally Posted By: NHSilverado
Originally Posted By: virginoil

Rank them with this in mind.

"If you were the warranty claim manager for the new vehicle manufacturer what criteria would you apply in ensuring the certification of the engine oils to protect the customer and minimise claims to your office."


This whole "certification" business is blown way out of proportion on this site. Certification is nothing more than a way ............ I personally have worked service and dealer parts and have dealt with this from the dealers side.


Please answer the question what criteria would you apply. The question I posed doesn't mean each oil has to be certified and approved by the OEM. As the warranty claim manager would you insist that
1. They are approved by API or other body
2. Demonstrate that the specs are similiar standard although without API or other approval.
3. Provide a copy of oil manufactures insurers certificate incase there is an oil related claim or
4. Any other creative scheme that comes to mind.

My question was to tease out what the reaction would be if you had the reality to fork out payment of the claim and would it influence your decision.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: virginoil


Please answer the question what criteria would you apply. The question I posed doesn't mean each oil has to be certified and approved by the OEM. As the warranty claim manager would you insist that
1. They are approved by API or other body
2. Demonstrate that the specs are similiar standard although without API or other approval.
3. Provide a copy of oil manufactures insurers certificate incase there is an oil related claim or
4. Any other creative scheme that comes to mind.

My question was to tease out what the reaction would be if you had the reality to fork out payment of the claim and would it influence your decision.


I actually understood your question. Probably should have quoted one of Busters posts but used yours instead to make my general comment on the current feelings around here by so many in regards to certified and oe rated fluids( like transmission for example ) being all one should use.

Legally you only have to meet or exceed the requirements/criteria the mfg sets forth( you do NOT have to use OE fluids nor use OE certified fluids ). So, that is what I would do and did as a servicer writer. People make this way more complicated than it is and give new car mfg's and dealerships way more power than they have.

Here is an example as to what can be done as a consumer and how I would have handled it as a service writer. I will use an oil change on my current vehicle as the test mule so to speak...

MFG REQUIREMENTS:
1 - API certified oil( GM has left themselves open here by not specifying a service level for a customer to use ANY API certified oil )
2 - "MEETS" GM6094M oil standard
3 - 5w30 weight required
4 - Change oil by OLM

These are the mfg's requirements set forth in my owner's manual for my new vehicle. They are the ONLY requirements I must follow. The same applies to anyone. What you must do is right there in your owner's manual and it is spelled out pretty simply. Too many folks however read more there than actually is or don't educate themselves on what rights they have under the law.

The manual simply says I must use an API certified 5w30 oil that "MEETS"( or exceeds legally )GM6094M. Nothing about "certified to meet GM6094M" because legally they could not do that. I actually scanned my owner's manual to back this up as I know darn well people will call [censored]...

oil1.jpg

oil2.jpg


Let's use me and what I will do before I go into service writer mode.
LOL.gif


I will use Royal Purple 5w30 and I will change it every 5K. RP 5w30 is API certified( SL ), it is the correct weight, it not only meets GM6094M it exceeds that standard( have compared RP's test data to the standard spec's and provided a copy of their oil's spec's to my dealership so there is no question/problem - even though it has not been certified by GM it is 100% fine to use ), and 5K has always fallen far short of my OLM running out. Were the OLM to ever run out short of 5K for some reason I would change it then. So, I am good to go warranty wise.

Now as a service writer how would I handle it? Let's use the same vehicle requirements of API certified, 5w30, meets GM6094M, change by OLM and apply it to someone else with me as the service writer. Customer comes in with the following - Amsoil 5W-20 oil and wants to run 25K once a year OC's. **NOTE - this is NOT an Amsoil slam just using them as an example because they, like RP, refuse to become mfg certified and most who run really long OCI's do so with Amsoil**

1 - Oil is not API certified so strike 1. Yes, apparantly it meets or exceeds the current API service level requirements BUT GM actually can require cetification here( to my understanding anyway )because this is an outside source certification standard and not one of their own design. This( ie; GM standard )would fall under requiring you to use the mfg's fluids/parts and thus they must be provided free by law. I am not 100% sure on this one but this is my interpretation of it and how I would proceed until shown I was wrong. Amsoil claims meeting the service level requirement makes it okay but I have seen them make false statements before and GM is very specific in the manual it MUST bear the API starburt symbol( API donut showing service level also would qualify as API certified ).

2 - 5W-20 is not 5w30. The mfg has the legal right to require you use a certain weight. Just as you can't go up to say a 10W-40 or 20W-50 you can't drop down to a 20 weight oil. I would advise them to go back for the proper weight or they risk warranty.

3 - GM6094M. Amsoil is not certified to this standard( yes I know it certainly exceeds it but not the point here )so I would request the customer provide me with the test data showing how the oil they want to use does against the standard. If it passed and was okay with 1 & 2 I would have no issue with it and legally couldn't anyway.

4 - 25K once a year OC. NOT happening! No need to say more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally Posted By: bigjeffie
1) bacon grease
2) beef tallow
3) crisco
4) soy milk
5) playground sand
6) landscaping gravel
7) Royal Purple


Lame!
 
Good points.

Preferably, I'd like to use oils like M1/PP that "Meet and Exceed" the min. API requirements and are truly API certified. Best of both worlds.

If the car I have for some reason needs something other than API cert. oil, I'd have no issues using a boutique brand.

People that run/use Redline 0w5 or 0w10 qualifying oils are not concerned about the API or warranty issues, obviously. Same with JGR oils etc. These are small niche products for a specific market.

The question in my mind then becomes, what do I gain by not using a non api cert oil? With Amsoil you gain longer drain intervals which may be well worth it for you and your driving situation. For others, the value is just not there as we have seen all API SM oils perform very well for what they are intended to do.
 
Originally Posted By: bigjeffie
1) bacon grease
2) beef tallow
3) crisco
4) soy milk
5) playground sand
6) landscaping gravel
7) Royal Purple


That's pretty funny. Never thought of soy milk between crisco and sand on a lubricity scale. BITOG has really opened my eyes.
grin2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: NHSilverado

Customer comes in with the following - Amsoil 5W-20 oil and wants to run 25K once a year OC's....

1 - Oil is not API certified so strike 1.
2 - 5W-20 is not 5w30.......


Actually Amsoil 5W-20 is fully API certified, but indeed if someone uses the wrong 100°C viscosity oil and the oil causes a failure they are screwed, because Amsoil won't cover them either.

Lastly Amsoil doesn't now, nor ever has recommended 25K OCI's on the 5W-20.

I fully know you weren't bagging on Amsoil, but people read this stuff as factual.
 
Mobil 1 Delvac 1 for my truck. Been around awhile, good sruff, readily available, good price (current stash was $4 a qt).

Mobil 1 5w30 T&S for my son's truck, and the Taurus. Readily available at about $4 a qt. For PCMOs I just look for an A5/B5 rating, which suggests it's adequate for higher performance applications and extended drains.
 
Idiot!!!

Originally Posted By: bigjeffie
1) bacon grease
2) beef tallow
3) crisco
4) soy milk
5) playground sand
6) landscaping gravel
7) Royal Purple
 
Originally Posted By: Brien
Isnt M1 the only full synthetic(G-IV/V) on that list, besides GC?

If so, its amazing that it does not consistantly show better used oil analysis then GIIIs


It's not typically run head to head against other oils under the same conditions. We're mostly dealing with varying levels of noise. Nothing to sweat one way or the other. Even a less than stellar UOA is just fine in terms of engine longevity. Now you'll see good used oil analysis with PP ..but hardly anyone really runs it out to an extended OCI. Some don't with M1 either ..but run them both out to 10k-15k+ (you shouldn't need Mobil 1 Extended Performance to do this) and you may see differences in the oil's condition at that length of service ..maybe you won't
21.gif
But PP is just cheap enough to use as a dino ..that's what gives it such high ratings.
 
Impossible!

Whatever floats your boat, I think all these oils are good oils. Any ranking on my part would be based on availability and name recognition, not quality.

It is the same thing if you ask what is the best outboard motor, truck, motorcycle, lightbulb, paperplate, whatever.

I think this is the message that bigjeffe was trying to get across. Simply put not a question that has a rational answer.
 
Here's where you might open yourself up to an issue -
The key statement in your owner's manual is in the notice at the end - "Use only engine oil identified as meeting GM Standard GM6094M..."

I'll bet you dollars to donuts there is is a trademark licensing issue involved in putting a statement on your oil bottle that you meet the GM standard without GM's concurrence that you have done so.

This explains why Royal Purple's and Redline's websites makes no mention of GM or any other manufacturer approval. Amsoil gets around this concern by using statements like "...recommended for all domestic and foreign vehicles requiring any of the listed performance specifications". By contrast, Mobil 1 comes out and says straight up "Mobil 1 5w30 has the following builder approvals: "

I'm not trying to start a debate about the virtues or vices of any of the aforementioned oils. But if push came to shove on warranty issue for which oil may have been a contributing cause, using an oil not specifically identified as meeting the GM standard opens you up to problems. For as you stated, you will not have met the clear and specific oil requirements the manufacture set forth.
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Originally Posted By: NHSilverado

Customer comes in with the following - Amsoil 5W-20 oil and wants to run 25K once a year OC's....

1 - Oil is not API certified so strike 1.
2 - 5W-20 is not 5w30.......


Actually Amsoil 5W-20 is fully API certified, but indeed if someone uses the wrong 100°C viscosity oil and the oil causes a failure they are screwed, because Amsoil won't cover them either.

Lastly Amsoil doesn't now, nor ever has recommended 25K OCI's on the 5W-20.

I fully know you weren't bagging on Amsoil, but people read this stuff as factual.


My apologies. I made a few assumptions and quick points without researching it fully. I know not all of their oils are API certified and I know they have these long drain interval recommended oils. I was just kind of throwing oil weight and general things together. Shouldn't have done that but was trying more to make a general point than actually be 100% accurate on Amsoil. Basically just using their name. Probably should have said Brand X instead.
 
Originally Posted By: jpr
Here's where you might open yourself up to an issue -
The key statement in your owner's manual is in the notice at the end - "Use only engine oil identified as meeting GM Standard GM6094M..."

I'll bet you dollars to donuts there is is a trademark licensing issue involved in putting a statement on your oil bottle that you meet the GM standard without GM's concurrence that you have done so.

This explains why Royal Purple's and Redline's websites makes no mention of GM or any other manufacturer approval. Amsoil gets around this concern by using statements like "...recommended for all domestic and foreign vehicles requiring any of the listed performance specifications". By contrast, Mobil 1 comes out and says straight up "Mobil 1 5w30 has the following builder approvals: "

I'm not trying to start a debate about the virtues or vices of any of the aforementioned oils. But if push came to shove on warranty issue for which oil may have been a contributing cause, using an oil not specifically identified as meeting the GM standard opens you up to problems. For as you stated, you will not have met the clear and specific oil requirements the manufacture set forth.


Actually, Royal Purple specifically mentions meeting GM4781M on the bottle despite not being certified to meet it. It is all in the wording. They can say meets/exceeds the standard they just can't call it certified if it isn't. Same way a universal ATF can list a ton of fluids that it can be used for even if not that actual fluid. Legally all the oil has to do is meet or exceed the standard specifications to use it. Having it listed on the bottle means nothing. API certification is a different issue than mfg fluid standards.

GM never actually comes out and says it must list it on the bottle either. Just "look for an oil that meets the standard" or "one identified as meeting the standard". I can "look" for one by researching how the oil performs vs the standard requirements and I can write the mfg who can respond telling me it meeets or exceeds the standard and that "identifies" it. Neither says it must be certified nor that it must be listed on the bottle.

I understand the point you made but it doesn;t hold water( not meant aggressive just as factual statement ).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom