Originally Posted By: Gunatics_Adler
Might I add that a lot of people go to carbs as they are easier for joe blow to tune on his own.
Yup, and they LOOK good!!! I have an HP750, and it is VERY pretty!
Quote:
And for rollers, I realize that a lot of small blocks went roller in the 80's but a lot of those motors were not exactly better power makers compared to their flat tappet 60's brothers. I would prefer an inexpensive flat tappet cam speced for a LT1 350 than a roller cam from a smogger 350 motor.
Speaking EXCLUSIVELY for Ford here, the Mustang camshaft from '87-93 was actually a pretty decent grind. .444/.444 lift and 212/212 at .050 IIRC. Slap on a set of pedestal mount 1.7 ratio Cobra rockers (dirt cheap) and you've got a complete roller valvetrain and .472 lift.
You must also remember that how HP was measured changed significantly from the 60's to the 80's. A 225HP 302 from 1987 makes in the neighbourhood of 300HP using the 1960's SAE gross figure.
In fact, an interesting note: Carcraft made 278HP with a BONE STOCK Mustang 302 on an engine dyno with doing nothing more than converting it to carb.
A set of AFR 165 heads on it, while retaining the STOCK CAM, and it made 382HP. Added the same rockers I mentioned above, and it made 405HP..... Still using the STOCK Mustang cam.
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0307_ford_302_v8_engine_buildup/index.html