Look, there is no, "one size fits all". Los Gatos gets a ton of sun and energy rates are high. I plan on staying in this house until they take me out in a box. Does that mean it works for everyone? Of course not.
This is the thing - these events are not common. I would only choose a vehicle based on what works well for me on a day to day basis. That would definitely be an electric vehicle but I'm not willing to spend that much at this point and we love our 2005 CR-V so I don't see us changing anytime soon.We dont really have issues like this in the USA and not a reason to chose one source vs another. If anything in the USA we are far more affected by electric power loses than that of delivery trucks.
norway's climate is far from being harsch. their winters are extremely mild. even a city like tromso who is 300km north of the arctic circle, the average temperature in january is -1 celcius. i was there in 2018.
Talking about NEM 3.0 and over penetration.The latest revision of NEM, due to over-penetration of solar and the impact theses schemes had on retail rates, has dropped compensation to $0.04/kWh, so you no longer get credited full retail for your output.
So, no, the same deal cannot be made today.
That's the whole thing about all of this solar crap. If it was that wonderful, it would sell itself. People would be running to buy it. They wouldn't have to go door to door aggravating people, trying to push it.I had someone knocking on my door Tuesday trying to pitch solar panels. Oh God how I miss my dog. Needless to say I sent him paching in under 30 seconds, and he won't be back. LOL
Ok, let's get this straight. Norway has an abundance of hydro and EVs work well there.
The USA has an abundance of Petroleum and we think EVs will work here.
Norway is about the size of CA with the longest distance being 1,100 miles. The USA is how wide? Where does our power come from? Some of everything.
The scarcity mindset of Petroleum is the scary thing.
If the US were to give everyone a huge incentive to buy an EV they would fly off the lots. But then how would we charge them all? Oh right, at night with our solar panels!
I hear ya. He won't be coming back. lolThat's the whole thing about all of this solar crap. If it was that wonderful, it would sell itself. People would be running to buy it. They wouldn't have to go door to door aggravating people, trying to push it.
Not to mention if they're having this much difficulty selling it now, imagine how many are not going to want it when all the government subsidies run out. Many are having difficulty breaking even with them. Without them it's all but a guaranteed loss.
Paying for them is........ Finding places to put chargers is not that complicated …
That would be a problem for Norway - not you …Paying for them is.
It's a problem for everyone. Where do you think these countries get their money? The government itself produces nothing.That would be a problem for Norway - not you …
We did give huge incentives.Ok, let's get this straight. Norway has an abundance of hydro and EVs work well there.
The USA has an abundance of Petroleum and we think EVs will work here.
Norway is about the size of CA with the longest distance being 1,100 miles. The USA is how wide? Where does our power come from? Some of everything.
The scarcity mindset of Petroleum is the scary thing.
If the US were to give everyone a huge incentive to buy an EV they would fly off the lots. But then how would we charge them all? Oh right, at night with our solar panels!
You have one citizenship and lots of unsupported bias - know much about Equinor ?It's a problem for everyone. Where do you think these countries get their money? The government itself produces nothing.
It's a problem for everyone. Where do you think these countries get their money? The government itself produces nothing.
Norway, the world's 8th or 8th largest exporter of crude. Hypocrisy laid bare.Easy to do when the population of the country is less than 6 million and 91% of the electricity is produced by hydro in a country only slightly smaller than the state of California. Anyone who thinks this can be implemented in the USA is a few fries short of a happy meal.
I'll say its again.Norway has an abundance of Petroleum too! But the focus has been prioritizing export and putting profit in the national wealth fund. As an example they have long had higher tax on larger engine sizes.
Hydro is one thing.
The real cost is building charging and power grid infrastructure.
Nuclear and solar is not massively more expensive.
I'll say its again.
Norway, the world's 8th or 8th largest exporter of crude. Hypocrisy laid bare.
It's like the big Asian nation that bans drugs but is the largest producer of Fentanyl in the world.
If Norway had any principles whatsoever they would stop producing and exporting crude.
Scott
They should stop production of oil because they feel it's harmful to the planet. Instead, Norway lines its pockets with black gold money.And U.S is no.3 exporter and top 1 consumer per capita by large margin. Why should Norway stop production of Oil?
See them as a country that plans for the future when the oil is not as relevant in 50-100+ years. Atleast not too Norway, they dont invade every country in the middle east and beyond that has oil.
They should stop production of oil because they feel it's harmful to the planet. Instead, Norway lines its pockets with black gold money.
Agree on your invading comment. Applies to Europe and Asia too. Let those nations deal with their own issues and fight their own turf wars. I'd rather America ignore them and spend its money on domestic issues.
Scott