Normal for more tire wear in front?

The need for tire rotation depends.

On my FWD Fiesta the front tires wore out like crazy.

BMW recommended against rotating the tires on my RWD 528i. The idea was that tires develop a set and "like where they are". Its tires wore quite evenly.

The tires on my RWD Tesla wear pretty evenly. I rotated them recently but I don't think they needed it.
 
Normal because on an AWD vehicle power distribution is still biased towards the front under normal driving conditions. Plus added wear due to the effects of steering and due to most vehicles being more heavy in the front. More scrubbing occurs on the front tires.
Not on this model. It's got a full-time 4wd system and has a longitudinally mounted drivetrain and transfer case. This isn't like the crop of modern awd CUVs that are typically front biased with transverse engines.
 
I keep meticulous records on 8 cars. Including rotations. Sometimes I do a rotation and forget to enter in into my notes. And then I go back a month later and can’t remember if they got rotated. So I rotate them again. LOL Back to where they were. In effect, they never got rotated. And I never drive this car until I change the oil.

From the looks of the wear, I must’ve done this twice at least. 5/32 rear 3/32 front.
 
Not on this model. It's got a full-time 4wd system and has a longitudinally mounted drivetrain and transfer case. This isn't like the crop of modern awd CUVs that are typically front biased with transverse engines.
So then it has something like a 40 front/60 rear power split. The front tires still wear more due to cornering and inertial shift with forces affecting the front tires more compared to the rear.
 
475 ponies! Isn't that weak and anemic by today's standards? (ha-ha)
My Corvette only has 455 horsepower but with only 3300 pounds to propel, it’s definitely not anemic. Mine has done a best 0-60 of 3.8 seconds (that would work out to high 11s in the quarter mile). That’s pretty good for me 😊
 
My Corvette only has 455 horsepower but with only 3300 pounds to propel, it’s definitely not anemic. Mine has done a best 0-60 of 3.8 seconds (that would work out to high 11s in the quarter mile). That’s pretty good for me 😊
Effectively the same drag times as my 1.8L station wagon. 3.9 0-60 and a 12.1 @ 113.4 1/4. I'm at a similar power to weight - 3350 or so with 400 hp.
 
I am good about rotations, I think they prolong tire life on my vehicles. I go 5-7K typically and do them if possible with oil changes. I've usually just done simple front to back type rotations but will cross them sometimes which is more ideal to get them in all 4 positions. I usually see front wear more than rear which makes sense on fwd/fwd-biased awd vehicles.
 
On my RWD truck, fronts didn't wear that badly, I could have done over 10k for rotations, maybe even none at all. I tended to drive it easily--I suspect getting rapid shoulder wear on the front tires was possible, and I do recall seeing some, so I did do rotations, Just seemed like it wasn't that bad.

But my FWD's? usually I can tell that it's been 5k since last rotation. My wife drives a bit more gentle than I do and her car can seemingly get away without it... when the tires get old and slow down their rate of wear. New-ish tires do seem to benefit. And on my car... despite driving a Toyota I seem to corner hard enough that it is needed.

I've also found that, despite alignments, that my FWD's will start feathering rear tires after 100k or so. Rotations become important once that starts happening.
 
So then it has something like a 40 front/60 rear power split. The front tires still wear more due to cornering and inertial shift with forces affecting the front tires more compared to the rear.
It is 50/50%. It is a traditional 4WD and a full-time one.
You are right:
It will wear out front's faster bcs. it is V8 in front, it is heavy, and the rear is a very simple, solid axle. There is no hint of dynamics here, so it will overwhelm tires really fast in front during cornering. Tires must take a lot here to compensate for suspension deficiencies when it comes to performance.
 
Be easy on me. I have made a mistake in my tire rotation in my GX470 SUV AWD. The front tires are a lot more worn than the rear.
In a car like mine, does more wear occur on the front or rear. I'm thinking front. If so, I'm gonna do a quick rotation and try and get
a little more life out of them.
If It's a Lexus GX470 like I'm thinking of it's actually full-time 4wd not awd. Is it wearing more on one side than the other? According to a few offroad forums etc the vehicle squats above 62 mph. Due to the suspension design having adjustable height maybe look at camber, caster and toe on an alignment rack. One individual on a Lexus forum had the place perform an alignment at normal and full raised height.
 
If you accelerate,brake and turn mildly maybe your tire rotations aren't as important as someone who drives with more spirit.Their is no right or wrong answer.Highway miles versus an short tripper.I use a tread depth Guage and air Guage frequently, so my tendencies are about my style.I like to rotate at 5,000 miles at my oil changes,done at the dealer
 
About when did it become permissible to criss cross radial tires when rotating? I remember the early BF Goodrich Radial TA's could only be rotated front to back, on the same side.

The origin of NOT cross rotating tires goes back to the days of the Firestone 500 - the late 1970's, when steel belted radial tires were first introduced. There was a rubber chemistry problem. The chemical that was used to promote adhesion (HMT - hexamethylenetetramine) of the rubber to the copper in the brass coated steel wires, caused an acid in the presence of water, which corroded the steel. Water vapor can penetrate through rubber, so figuring this out was difficult, and Firestone was the last to do so - and they were stubborn about admitting they had a problem.

One of the things that was discovered during investigations was that the first detachments of the steel wire from the rubber occurred on one side of the wire - and to slow down the spread of these separations into a more generalized separation, it was recommended that steel belted tires NOT be cross rotated. I was not a fan of this approach.

Once all the tire manufacturers figured out the chemistry and changed it, the problem disappeared and there wasn't any need to recommend against cross rotating tires.

HOWEVER, these kind of things linger on - and even though it's been over 50 years, the recommendation is still remembered. If you'll notice, the USTMA (US Tire Manufacturers Association) says NOTHING about not cross rotating tires.
 
Back
Top