Originally Posted by RSKYBET
I'd like to see what you guys are seeing. What jumps out at you about VMP? It looks slightly thinner than Edge C3, HTHS of 3.6 vs 3.5, and VI of 164 vs 173. Is the TBN of 6.6 low?
high flashpoint, low pour point, and low noack, mostly. As far as viscosity, it meets the 504/507 spec, so it's "thick enough"--and it's also supposedly more shear stable due to the base oils and VI improvers used. In use, it'll likely be as thick as some other off the shelf 0W40's after they shear down.
As far as TBN, if you're doing 5-6K intervals due to potential fuel dilution, I see no advantage to a high TBN oil.
I'd like to see what you guys are seeing. What jumps out at you about VMP? It looks slightly thinner than Edge C3, HTHS of 3.6 vs 3.5, and VI of 164 vs 173. Is the TBN of 6.6 low?
high flashpoint, low pour point, and low noack, mostly. As far as viscosity, it meets the 504/507 spec, so it's "thick enough"--and it's also supposedly more shear stable due to the base oils and VI improvers used. In use, it'll likely be as thick as some other off the shelf 0W40's after they shear down.
As far as TBN, if you're doing 5-6K intervals due to potential fuel dilution, I see no advantage to a high TBN oil.