Originally Posted By: refaller
I think you are correct that noise is about the only issue. I believe someone has told me that belts can rev more as well, but I am not sure if they had evidence. I certainly would prefer a chain, but changing the belt on my CRV was doable and I will probably only have to do it once- material and tool costs were a little over $200 for new belt, water pump and gaskets- needed a bigger torque wrench as well.
ref
I'll throw this in there too. On the Gates site, there is an industrial belt called the Poly Carbon or something to that effect that is 2 to 3 times stronger than even a chain and lasts longer. It is only for industrial apps though.
Why in 2008 have we still not seen a timing belt that is designed to go 150K, 200Kk or more? They are still 60K or 105K and a Subaru that is 120K. Maybe there is one I don't know about, but I haven't seen one yet.
I think you are correct that noise is about the only issue. I believe someone has told me that belts can rev more as well, but I am not sure if they had evidence. I certainly would prefer a chain, but changing the belt on my CRV was doable and I will probably only have to do it once- material and tool costs were a little over $200 for new belt, water pump and gaskets- needed a bigger torque wrench as well.
ref
I'll throw this in there too. On the Gates site, there is an industrial belt called the Poly Carbon or something to that effect that is 2 to 3 times stronger than even a chain and lasts longer. It is only for industrial apps though.
Why in 2008 have we still not seen a timing belt that is designed to go 150K, 200Kk or more? They are still 60K or 105K and a Subaru that is 120K. Maybe there is one I don't know about, but I haven't seen one yet.