New Amsoil M/C 10W-40 94 ZX-11 1565 miles

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
2,187
Location
Cedar Park, TX
side by side for easy comparison: Miles on oil 761 1565 Fe 16 12 Cr 0 1 Pb 0 1 Cu 4 4 Sn 0 0 Al 9 8 Ni 0 0 Ag 0 0 Si 5 2 B 16 10 Na 8 3 Mg 179 106 Ca 3067 2538 Ba 0 0 P 1172 1232 Zn 1506 1565 Mo 40 26 Ti 0 0 Va 0 0 K 0 0 Fuel <1 <1 [email protected] 11.57 11.94 Water 0 0 Glycol NEG NEG TBN 9.1 9.11 honestly, i suspect the sample or analysis. here is why: Zn went up????? P went up??? Al went down? Si went down??? as did Na? so here is what imho think happened. the samples were taken at either a different points in the drain stream or their setup is wacko. 60 more zn and 60 more p. where did that come from? and at the same time something sucked the aluminum and silicon out? huh? after these 2 uoa's, i'd really scratch my head at the ones doing the tests. i once sent 2 samples of the same oil to 2 different labs { blackstone and southwest } . the results were within 2-3ppm on every single element that was over 10ppm. definately switch to some other oil.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
500
Location
Vermont
I think what we have are some big expectations for this oil (I know I keep rooting for Amsoil to kick butt) that my measly two UOA's fail to meet. Compared to my other reports, the Amsoil shows equal if not better wear numbers. Viscocity? Well, like I've said before, it could be a **** 20wt for all I care, as long as it protects. Unfortunately, even at wholesale, this oil is more expensive than anything else I have tried, and doesn't give me justifiably better numbers. I hope others try this oil, I'm betting it may prove a really good oil, my results might be off the beaten path.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Messages
48,024
Location
Everson WA - Pacific NW USA
I really think you should give it a second chance without the LC. I'm not saying LC is bad or anything but you went through some other oils before, had some high iron events.....and now a new synthetic oil and LC - there probably is some cleaning going on, too. (beside the thinning effect) Just curious - what was your logic for using LC?
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
500
Location
Vermont
I started using Lube Control at the start of the summer as a consistent level of "extra" cleaning after I did an AutoRX cleaning. I only used the LC with the Amsoil because I had used it with all the other oils I analyzed, so I wanted it to be fair. I'm quickly running out of summer here, but next summer I will be sure to do lots more analyzing.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
500
Location
Vermont
This is the same oil that was sampled at 761 miles, but with double the miles.
code:
  
miles on oil        1565
miles on unit       ~36000
Fe                  12
Cr                  1
Pb                  1
Cu                  4
Sn                  0
Al                  8
Ni                  0
Ag                  0
Si                  2
B                   10
Na                  3
Mg                  106
Ca                  2538
Ba                  0
P                   1232
Zn                  1565
Mo                  26
Ti                  0
V                   0
K                   0
Fuel                <1
Water               0
Glycol              NEG
Nitration           8
Oxidation           4
TBN                 9.11
[email protected]           11.94

It sure is weird to see some wear metals actually drop. The viscocity did climb a bit, whether that's a normal thing, or the LC burned off, who knows. Still a 30wt. I hate to jump to conclusions, but based on the price, shifting quality, and wear numbers, I'm not sold on this stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top