So do they write a check for $7,200 to get out from under the loan?
Worse, they roll it into their next car purchase sinking themselves even further underwater.So do they write a check for $7,200 to get out from under the loan?
You can do that? Isn't the loan secured by the new car's value? Sounds like some kinda predatory (aka stupid) lending.Worse, they roll it into their next car purchase sinking themselves even further underwater.
Lending up to 140% LTV is pretty common.You can do that? Isn't the loan secured by the new car's value? Sounds like some kinda predatory (aka stupid) lending.
Now you're scaring me... OMG. Why would anyone do such a thing? And why would a lender do such a thing? Everybody loses.Lending up to 140% LTV is pretty common.
That's exactly what they do. I suspect there is way more money made on the financing than ever made on the car.Worse, they roll it into their next car purchase sinking themselves even further underwater.
That's exactly what they do. I suspect there is way more money made on the financing than ever made on the car.
Chicken or egg?I’m not entirely certain we could maintain the current population of the western world without debt. Buying a house or car or going to college would be virtually unattainable for the vast majority of the population in the US without it. And it’s significantly easier for individuals to live debt free vs entire nations.
Wall Street journal has published article stating the average negative equity on for traded cars in 2026 is $7200.
This jumped 40% since 2021.
That just makes it worse for the owner as the used car market is propped up as a less expensive, yet still expensive, alternative to the new car market.Average car price has probably jumped 25% in the same time period so 40% might not be as big as the headlines indicate.
Yup, and in a few years the WSJ will publish an article titled “average negative equity for trade-ins in 2030 is $14,400”Worse, they roll it into their next car purchase sinking themselves even further underwater.
I have been going with the financing specials offered from the manufacturer for the last few cars but in the past I've gotten preapprovals from USAA, PenFed and NFCU. I believe they were willing to finance up to 125% of the LTV. I never did that, but I think they offered it. That said, it's been at least a decade since I've done that so I don't know their current policies.You can do that? Isn't the loan secured by the new car's value? Sounds like some kinda predatory (aka stupid) lending.
Well...cashflow/savings has to play into it a little bit but I agree with your sentiment. I CAN pay cash for any vehicle I buy, but I CHOSE not to because interest rates were ridiculously low for the past decade and I like a healthy emergency fund. Scenarios like I just paid $60k for vehicle and when I get home, I open a letter from my homeowner's insurance stating I have 6 weeks to replace my $40k roof or they're dropping me and boom just like that, $100k is gone, run through my mind. Admittedly, some of them are remote but I sleepThere are pros and cons to paying cash for a vehicle. My simple philosophy is, is you can't pay cash, you can't afford it.
I hate debt in general, but for depreciating assets? Please.
Lexus has a current offer:Well...cashflow/savings has to play into it a little bit but I agree with your sentiment. I CAN pay cash for any vehicle I buy, but I CHOSE not to because interest rates were ridiculously low for the past decade and I like a healthy emergency fund. Scenarios like I just paid $60k for vehicle and when I get home, I open a letter from my homeowner's insurance stating I have 6 weeks to replace my $40k roof or they're dropping me and boom just like that, $100k is gone, run through my mind. Admittedly, some of them are remote but I sleep soundly at night this way.
Now, if I hadn't had access to 0-2.9% financing, I may have considered cash.
Here's what the chat has to say on a $65k Lexus. It's always fun to see if my intuition is correct and here I predicted $5k/0% would be significantly better. Interestingly, below $26.5K, the $7500 cash wins.Lexus has a current offer:
That's free money.
- $7500 Lex cash OR
- $5000 Lex cash + 0% financing for up to 60 months.
| Offer | Amount financed | APR | Monthly payment | Total paid over 60 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $7,500 Lexus cash | $57,500 | 4.99% | about $1,085 | about $65,080 |
| $5,000 Lexus cash + 0% | $60,000 | 0% | $1,000 | $60,000 |
And that assumes you financed the $57,500. All I am saying is, there are lot's of ways to slice up the deal.Here's what the chat has to say on a $65k Lexus. It's always fun to see if my intuition is correct and here I predicted $5k/0% would be significantly better. Interestingly, below $26.5K, the $7500 cash wins.
On a $65,000 vehicle, assuming you finance for 60 months and ignore tax/title/fees for simplicity:
Offer Amount financed APR Monthly payment Total paid over 60 months $7,500 Lexus cash $57,500 4.99% about $1,085 about $65,080 $5,000 Lexus cash + 0% $60,000 0% $1,000 $60,000
Difference: the 0% financing offer saves about $5,080 total, and the monthly payment is about $85 lower.
So on a $65K vehicle, the $5,000 Lexus cash + 0% for 60 months is clearly better.
Yeah, no, I wasn't making a statement either way. I just wanted to know which one saved more and while it is not difficult math, it's cool that the ChatGPT can do it so easily.That assumes you financed the $57,500. All I am saying is, there are lot's of ways to slice up the deal.
I hate payments, but a zero percent loan would allow you to put $$ into another appreciating asset. A loan is simply acquiring an asset with other people's money. Again, lotsa considerations. Oh yeah, I've made my mistakes, some doozeys!