Originally Posted By: goodtimes
I see no link to a diesel engine bus study.
I gave the way to find all the talk about the bus study that's gone on here - you were even commenting in most of those threads, but apparently lost memory of the discussions. I've shown the main graphs from the study showing that filters tested in the lab correlate to how well they keep the oil clean in actual use in the real world. Filters that tested the most efficient in the lab kept the oil the cleanest ... so surprise there Einstein.
The bus study was done to show that more efficient oil filters reduced engine wear - read the last sentence carefully in the synopsis below. I don't know what else the non-believing 'flat earthers' want for proof, yet they just keep on babbling nonsense that it's not true and never show proof to support the claims.
Go search for SAE Paper 902238 ... and buy the paper to read it yourself. The synopsis pretty much tells the story, but if you don't believe it then prove otherwise. You continually come up with some cockamamie claim, but never have any real valid data to back it up.

I see no link to a diesel engine bus study.
I gave the way to find all the talk about the bus study that's gone on here - you were even commenting in most of those threads, but apparently lost memory of the discussions. I've shown the main graphs from the study showing that filters tested in the lab correlate to how well they keep the oil clean in actual use in the real world. Filters that tested the most efficient in the lab kept the oil the cleanest ... so surprise there Einstein.
The bus study was done to show that more efficient oil filters reduced engine wear - read the last sentence carefully in the synopsis below. I don't know what else the non-believing 'flat earthers' want for proof, yet they just keep on babbling nonsense that it's not true and never show proof to support the claims.
Go search for SAE Paper 902238 ... and buy the paper to read it yourself. The synopsis pretty much tells the story, but if you don't believe it then prove otherwise. You continually come up with some cockamamie claim, but never have any real valid data to back it up.
