I stand by my original comment.
“I don’t think it’s the systems, it’s the drivers. The number of doped up drivers on the roads is crazy.”
Two distinct circumstances.
Distracted with phones, food, selfies, calls, texting, etc...not the car systems.
I stand by my original comment.
“I don’t think it’s the systems, it’s the drivers. The number of doped up drivers on the roads is crazy.”
Two distinct circumstances.
I still stand by the comment that the rise in fatalities in the last 2 years is due to COVID weirdness not distracted driving/related to car nannies...it had been tracking down except for the tick up in 2015 and I'm going with smart phones being the norm then and people texting and driving like crazy. I hardly see folks driving with their phones like I did back then. Data from wikipedia.No there isn't, but with the average new car price increasing every year and now is ~$37k, I think most recently new cars have some or all of these systems, and every year more old cars get scrapped.
So my assumption that each year the US car fleet in general is safer than the previous is probably correct, no? And yet traffic fatalities are going up?
My guess is that these nanny systems allow more distracted driving which is the real problem. A set of human eyes attached to a reasonably attentive brain, with some training, and many hundreds of hours experience is still much more capable to avoid an accident than a computer. The trick is to keep the human watching the road and driving with good habits.
I'm sure eventually full self driving cars will be as safe as human piloted airline travel, but probably will require real time communications between vehicles and a virtual "slot car" system.
I forgot about a collapsible steering column - a good, welcome, driver "transparent" design change and serious injury preventer.I like that high tech starter pedal there.
Millions of people lost their teef and fractured their skulls on those steering wheels. Ah the good old days.
Distracted with phones, food, selfies, calls, texting, etc...not the car systems.
Never mind. Not worth the effort.
I am told by many insurance agents one of the primary reasons for the escalation in insurance rates is distracted driving......not "car nanny's" But then again-we have "insurance experts" on here as well....it seems.Funny, I was thinking the same. No hard feelings. I do understand there are more "medicated" folks on the road today, both legally and illegally. I just think that distracted driving seems to be a much more common and dangerous occurrence today.
Was it a V8? They have way too much power! I would want one with a stick to control the power application. But at over 500 gross HP and 6785 lb-ft torque at the rear wheels in first gear, no Average Joe consumer without some seat time behind the wheel can drive that safely - especially if he thinks he can womp on it at will.I’m pretty sure the nanny saved me from wrecking the nice Camaro I rented and proceed to accelerate hard on an entrance ramp. Back end came loose and started to go sideways. Not sure if I lifted fast enough, or traction control kicked in, but it stayed on the road.
Either way, the lesson there is don’t buy a rental Camaro…..
It absolutely is distracted driving.I am told by many insurance agents one of the primary reasons for the escalation in insurance rates is distracted driving......not "car nanny's" But then again-we have "insurance experts" on here as well....it seems.
I would agree that if you are totally "out to lunch" behind the wheel nothing will help.It absolutely is distracted driving.
Distracted driving is at the top, while intoxicated (alcohol or other substances) driving is still surprisingly close behind. The sad part is the car nannies don't help as much as some would believe. I've watched people hit stuff while I can hear the beeping from inside their car.
Yup. I think it was called a ZL-1? I’m not a Chevy guy, but I loved that car. Like the Challenger, it’s hard to see out of the back, but man was that car fun once I calibrated my foot. It was very comfortable and a nice driver on the highway.Was it a V8? They have way too much power! I would want one with a stick to control the power application. But at over 500 gross HP and 6785 lb-ft torque at the rear wheels in first gear, no Average Joe consumer without some seat time behind the wheel can drive that safely - especially if he thinks he can womp on it at will.
But how was it otherwise?
Keep it coming, grampi, we gotta teach these young kids a lesson!I'd post a comment in here, but it seems like every thread I start, or I post in gets shut down...oops, I just posted, so I guess this thread will get shut down...
No biggie... If you don't get shut down you ain't posting enough... Ha!I'd post a comment in here, but it seems like every thread I start, or I post in gets shut down...oops, I just posted, so I guess this thread will get shut down...
I don't believe that excessive speed causes accidents, but they are sure worse at high speed.I guess it's gonna suck to live in Europe in the near future. Speed limit sign readers are going to be made mandatory.
According to their (flawed) logic, 30% of accident are caused by excessive speed.
https://mashable.com/article/anti-speeding-isa-europe
My 17 Frontier pickup does have power windows, and cruise control, and A/C, and maybe (I'm not sure) ABS, but non of those nanny things. So far, as that is the newest vehicle I have had I have never had any of the nanny stuff.No power windows. No cruise. Manual trans. And a v10 ford truck. I want no lane assist or drive modes. My truck just works