How about Bobil 1, a short for Bob Oil (Guy) 1? We can also have Bobil Conventional, Bobil Super, Bobil 2, Bobil 3, etc.
Well, it's not Mobil 1 either. It's
Mobil [1]™.
Mobil blue: #12719D
Mobil red: #D50026
Mobil 1 identity guidelines
Don't waste your money on Mobil Super Synthetic. With its
combined NOACK*CCS rating (what I call "BOQI") of 32, it's one of the five lowest-rated synthetic oils out there, only ahead of Lucas Synthetic, Carquest Synthetic, Proline Synthetic, and Kum & Go Synthetic (all have BOQI = 31). Even the Mobil Super Conventional has BOQI = 30. Pennzoil Platinum PurePlus and Quaker State Ultimate Durability on the other hand have BOQI = 54 and 58, respectively.
Let's talk about Chrysler MS-6395 now.
Going through the specs, it seems almost identical to API SN RC/ILSAC GF-5, with very few minor differences. Firstly, unlike GM dexos, it specs conventional oil or better (NOACK 15% or lower). The only obvious difference I could catch was that it has stringer limits on elastomer compatibility. However, is this insignificant or is Chrysler really worried about leaky seals that may be caused by too much seal swellers or oils that cause too much seal shrinkage? Another thing I noticed is that they don't like production variations from the published data sheets.
If you are in doubt, you can definitely not go wrong with the top-of the-line Pennzoil Platinum or Quaker State Ultimate Durability, which are both MS-6395 and feature GTL and/or GTL-like base oils, with great combined NOACK*CCS ratings.
Analyze the spec for yourself.
Chrysler MS-6395 full specification: