I don't think anyone can win this recording thing. You might as well have asked me to prove how I know that Tandoori chicken tastes good. Noisy means different things to different people.
What were you expecting? Even if you got ridiculously lucky, and had 50 people give you a comparative sound recording with M1 and another brand, in a controlled environment, recorded with the same equipment, in the same way, and every forum member listened to the recordings on the exact same setup, that still wouldn't tell you jack ****, because everyone would still disagree what on noisy and not noisy was, and I'd bet a million bucks that you would get a bunch of recordings that all sounded completely different, and gave you mixed and/or unusable results anyway.
Even in the absolute most extreme circumstance, if all 50 sound recordings clearly and undeniably demonstrated that the engines recorded were XX dB louder or quieter running M1, you still wouldn't have any meaningful amount of data to extrapolate from, and people could still disagree on whether that amount of noise increase made their engines "noisy" or not, or whether they were bothered by that noise to begin with, even if they had deemed it "noisy", or whether or not they would stop buying M1 because they had deemed it "noisy". ****, maybe some people really like noisy engines, and it would be the other way around, who knows...
The easiest way for you to get your agenda across is probably to vehemently argue the point that the reports of M1 "making" an engine noisy are subjective, as is the term "noisy" itself, and that many factors could be in play in an event like the one you are talking about. You also have plenty of people on here who have given testimonials that M1 does not "make" their engines "noisy", so just fight fire with fire, and be happy with that. Otherwise, this will just end up in some epistemic cluster fock, and it will get shut down. How in the name of Almighty *** did this thread make it to 4 pages?
What were you expecting? Even if you got ridiculously lucky, and had 50 people give you a comparative sound recording with M1 and another brand, in a controlled environment, recorded with the same equipment, in the same way, and every forum member listened to the recordings on the exact same setup, that still wouldn't tell you jack ****, because everyone would still disagree what on noisy and not noisy was, and I'd bet a million bucks that you would get a bunch of recordings that all sounded completely different, and gave you mixed and/or unusable results anyway.
Even in the absolute most extreme circumstance, if all 50 sound recordings clearly and undeniably demonstrated that the engines recorded were XX dB louder or quieter running M1, you still wouldn't have any meaningful amount of data to extrapolate from, and people could still disagree on whether that amount of noise increase made their engines "noisy" or not, or whether they were bothered by that noise to begin with, even if they had deemed it "noisy", or whether or not they would stop buying M1 because they had deemed it "noisy". ****, maybe some people really like noisy engines, and it would be the other way around, who knows...
The easiest way for you to get your agenda across is probably to vehemently argue the point that the reports of M1 "making" an engine noisy are subjective, as is the term "noisy" itself, and that many factors could be in play in an event like the one you are talking about. You also have plenty of people on here who have given testimonials that M1 does not "make" their engines "noisy", so just fight fire with fire, and be happy with that. Otherwise, this will just end up in some epistemic cluster fock, and it will get shut down. How in the name of Almighty *** did this thread make it to 4 pages?
