NO; that's false logic. (I saw your edit; my points below are germane to all and not pointed at you)
The mandated cost itself is for a product (the charger). Some don't want/need a charger. So why is it mandatory? Only a small percentage of the population would "need" a charger. Yet they are inducing the cost into all new homes.
- Do they mandate larger garages for tall, 4-door, long bed one-ton trucks? No, they don't.
- Do they mandate high-amp 240 circuits in the basement of every new home so someone who enjoys making pottery at home has a place to wire in their kiln? No, they don't.
- Do they mandate thicker 8" concrete floors and 12' ceilings in garages in new home construction, so that a future buyer, three decades from now, can have a 2-post car lift? No, they don't.
All these examples, and countless others, are based on the concept of use of a product that is only suppositional for potential use for the NEXT homeowner, not the one building the home currently.
One could argue that safety products, which would be applicable to ALL persons present and future, are reasonable. Smoke detectors and CO detectors, for example, can benefit ANYONE who resides in the home now and in the future. Those products are sensible.
But that's not what we're talking about here; a large 240v EV charger isn't a "necessity" for safety. Every EV I know of can charge on 110v; it just takes a lot longer. So the mandate of installing a dedicated EV product into every new home is one of draconian monarchy; "Thou shalt do so because I decree thee to buy this product."
That mentality of forcing a product into our lives based on the limited possibility of use down the road is one of dubious and arrogant thinking.