MolaKule
Staff member
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?OH AND BY THE WAY IDEMITSU IS WHO SUPPLYS MOST ALL ASIAN AUTO MAKERS THEIR TRANSMISSION FLUIDS.
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?OH AND BY THE WAY IDEMITSU IS WHO SUPPLYS MOST ALL ASIAN AUTO MAKERS THEIR TRANSMISSION FLUIDS.
Huh ?And does that show the proper Idemitsu supplied to dealer or manufacture fluid, as it would be the same designation as what is on the bottle you'd buy at the dealer?
I think at this point reason has been lost.Huh ?
Actually I now realize the local trans shop is leery of flushing an old trans, but not afraid to just drain the pan an refill.Chris Fix Youtube how to DIY video and many others recently. Also I read this on DIY websites years ago. It's classic knowledge that still applies. My local trans shop also recently told me this (in regard to my Buick in that case) and they're pros. Also many on BITOG (including this thread) are leery of changing ATF in a neglected transnission.
You are so correct !I think at this point reason has been lost.
1) Dealers (even Honda) don't always use the "right" fluid and will often use fluid that's said to be compatible by the fluid manufacturer. That dealer may be using Idemitsu's ATF that they claim compatibility with DW-1.the Idemistu barrel at a Honda dealer with the proper designation for the particular fluid
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?And does that show the proper Idemitsu supplied to dealer or manufacture fluid, as it would be the same designation as what is on the bottle you'd buy at the dealer?
It has to be. No way a company like Valvoline would risk claiming their ATF is compatible if it weren't. Honda supposedly formulated DW-1 to make shifts firmer. When I test drive a car, I always find an open road and mash the throttle from a stop specifically to FEEL how it shifts. If it shifts butter-smooth, that's fine and if it shifts with firm, but quick shifts, that's fine too. It's when it SLAMs into each gear or slips that you uncover that you know to walk (IMO).My question is, is MaxLife OK for cars like early Hondas and Toyotas?
Yes post 53, shows no Idemitsu DW-1 it shows H. All apples to oranges on the chart.In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?
Did you read the educational references in post #54?
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?
It has to be. No way a company like Valvoline would risk claiming their ATF is compatible if it weren't. Honda supposedly formulated DW-1 to make shifts firmer. When I test drive a car, I always find an open road and mash the throttle from a stop specifically to FEEL how it shifts. If it shifts butter-smooth, that's fine and if it shifts with firm, but quick shifts, that's fine too. It's when it SLAMs into each gear or slips that you uncover that you know to walk (IMO).
Fluid makers do have products that are NOT compatible with certain OEM fluids and they either don't list them or they sell an entirely separate product. Isn't there a Chrysler fluid (ATF+4 ??) that's an oddball ? I'm not sure if Valvoline and others offer a substitute for Honda 10 or 11-speed transmissions either, do they ?
I never suggested that "compatible" = "matches exactly".but this does NOT mean Maxlife matches the OEM fluid exactly
Idemitsu doesn't sell an ATF called "DW-1". You claim to have seen a barrel of it though....shows no Idemitsu DW-1 it shows H. All apples to oranges on the chart.
People bought those fluids and sent them to a lab to have the composition analyzed.Please explain who developed the chart? Did that come from Idemitsu?
I would like to hear their explanation, of those differences and what it means for sure.
Post itLets be honest, has anyone here seen the photo that I posted reference to? Yes or No?
You and @Exhaustgases missed the point entirely.The table shows the fluids are not the same.
"Recommended (Industrial, Marketing) – This lubricant is not licensed by an OEM for the recommended listed coverage, but the manufacturer or blender believes it is appropriate because of internal or external testing, or the listed coverage is supported by the additive manufacturer who has tested the DI formulation in actual hardware.Sorry, but no. Valvoline may make their best attempt to match specs, those available to them, but this does NOT mean Maxlife matches the OEM fluid exactly.
Please explain why they cannot.Just look at the claimed approval list, which is dozens of different OEM specs. There is NO WAY one fluid can match the fluid of all those different OEM's.
I agree."Recommended (Industrial, Marketing) – This lubricant is not licensed by an OEM for the recommended listed coverage, but the manufacturer or blender believes it is appropriate because of internal or external testing, or the listed coverage is supported by the additive manufacturer who has tested the DI formulation in actual hardware.
"Recommended for the Following" DOES NOT imply the exact same chemistry as the OEM chemistry, but what it does imply is the viscosity, dynamic friction (shifting) characteristics, and other performance items are commensurate with the OEM fluid."
Please explain why they cannot.
While it's not classified, top-secret information, who makes Honda DW-1 isn't publicly advertised beyond the SDS. Look at a quart bottle of Honda DW-1 and find "Idemitsu". You won't. It won't even say "Blended by Idemitsu to Honda of America specifications".It's likely that someone did see an oil barrel at a Honda dealership with the Idemitsu logo and/or name on it. Why is this an argument? It's not a problem.
Idemitsu makes the OEM Honda brand oils, including DW-1. A possible exception might be Honda motor oils used in USA market.
In the recent past, I downloaded from a Honda dealership the Honda safety data sheets for Honda PSF and Honda DW-1. Both have the Idemitsu name and logo at top left of the data sheet.
It's entirely possible (likely) that a big barrel of Honda brand DW-1 would have both the Idemitsu and Honda names and/or logos on it.
Those two sentences contradict each other.Whether the barrel seen at the dealership was Honda brand oil made by Idemitsu, or Idemitsu brand oil made by Idemitsu is irrelevant.
Honda DW-1 ATF is made by Idemitsu to the specs that Honda thinks best for use in Hondas. Idemitsu Type H Plus ATF is made by Idemitsu to the specs that Idemitsu thinks best for use in Hondas.
Just because you won't see the word Idemitsu on a bottle of DW-1 sold to the public does not mean the word Idemitsu can't be on an industrial size 50 gallon barrel of DW-1 or other Honda oil.While it's not classified, top-secret information, who makes Honda DW-1 isn't publicly advertised beyond the SDS. Look at a quart bottle of Honda DW-1 and find "Idemitsu". You won't. It won't even say "Blended by Idemitsu to Honda of America specifications".
My statements were not contradictory. You didn't comprehend what I typed.Those two sentences contradict each other.
Not always. You're making assumptions. We don't know who that dealership ordered bulk oil from and we don't know what brand was ordered. Whatever brand it was, it's compatible in the dealer's opinion, which is good enough for me.Dealers order parts, fluids, etc from Honda of America.
They might have ordered Idemitsu Type H Plus from Idemitsu. We don't know who the dealership ordered from or what they ordered.If they order "DW-1, 55-gallon", a Honda warehouse won't even have Idemitsu Type H and substitute it as equivalent fluid.
That's unlikey, but anything is possible. Idemitsu has longterm relationships with Honda and other Japanese car brands.Today, Idemitsu might make Honda's genuine DW-1, but tomorrow, Shell or Valvoline or Bob's Lubricants could make it.