Maxlife ATF Compatibility

And does that show the proper Idemitsu supplied to dealer or manufacture fluid, as it would be the same designation as what is on the bottle you'd buy at the dealer?
 
Chris Fix Youtube how to DIY video and many others recently. Also I read this on DIY websites years ago. It's classic knowledge that still applies. My local trans shop also recently told me this (in regard to my Buick in that case) and they're pros. Also many on BITOG (including this thread) are leery of changing ATF in a neglected transnission.
Actually I now realize the local trans shop is leery of flushing an old trans, but not afraid to just drain the pan an refill.
 
I think at this point reason has been lost.
You are so correct !

It is obvious that you didn't see the photo of the Idemistu barrel at a Honda dealer with the proper designation for the particular fluid. I think it is CVT fluid. What I am saying is that chart is not showing the proper Idemitsu fluid, since it has a different designation than DW-1
(designation ? according to dictionary is the name or title ie DW-1) Yeah I know I'm always the dummy.
 
the Idemistu barrel at a Honda dealer with the proper designation for the particular fluid
1) Dealers (even Honda) don't always use the "right" fluid and will often use fluid that's said to be compatible by the fluid manufacturer. That dealer may be using Idemitsu's ATF that they claim compatibility with DW-1.
2) Honda DW-1 fluid will be in Honda-labeled packaging, whether 1-quart, 5-quart, 55-gallon, etc.
 
And does that show the proper Idemitsu supplied to dealer or manufacture fluid, as it would be the same designation as what is on the bottle you'd buy at the dealer?
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?

Did you read the educational references in post #54?
 
I certainly don't pretend to understand the chemistry, etc. My question is, is MaxLife OK for cars like early Hondas and Toyotas? I have to believe there are bazillions of 250K - 300K and beyond transmissions happily running MaxLife.

So, does it matter just because it is not the same? Tha't my bottom line question.
 
My question is, is MaxLife OK for cars like early Hondas and Toyotas?
It has to be. No way a company like Valvoline would risk claiming their ATF is compatible if it weren't. Honda supposedly formulated DW-1 to make shifts firmer. When I test drive a car, I always find an open road and mash the throttle from a stop specifically to FEEL how it shifts. If it shifts butter-smooth, that's fine and if it shifts with firm, but quick shifts, that's fine too. It's when it SLAMs into each gear or slips that you uncover that you know to walk (IMO).

Fluid makers do have products that are NOT compatible with certain OEM fluids and they either don't list them or they sell an entirely separate product. Isn't there a Chrysler fluid (ATF+4 ??) that's an oddball ? I'm not sure if Valvoline and others offer a substitute for Honda 10 or 11-speed transmissions either, do they ?
 
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?

Did you read the educational references in post #54?
Yes post 53, shows no Idemitsu DW-1 it shows H. All apples to oranges on the chart.
Please explain who developed the chart? Did that come from Idemitsu?
I would like to hear their explanation, of those differences and what it means for sure.

Lets be honest, has anyone here seen the photo that I posted reference to? Yes or No?

You will need to call or write to these folks for all the info you seek.

Read what they say here about who they supply too.

https://www.idemitsulubricants.com/about-us/why-idemitsu
 
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?

The table shows the fluids are not the same.
It has to be. No way a company like Valvoline would risk claiming their ATF is compatible if it weren't. Honda supposedly formulated DW-1 to make shifts firmer. When I test drive a car, I always find an open road and mash the throttle from a stop specifically to FEEL how it shifts. If it shifts butter-smooth, that's fine and if it shifts with firm, but quick shifts, that's fine too. It's when it SLAMs into each gear or slips that you uncover that you know to walk (IMO).

Fluid makers do have products that are NOT compatible with certain OEM fluids and they either don't list them or they sell an entirely separate product. Isn't there a Chrysler fluid (ATF+4 ??) that's an oddball ? I'm not sure if Valvoline and others offer a substitute for Honda 10 or 11-speed transmissions either, do they ?

Sorry, but no. Valvoline may make their best attempt to match specs, those available to them, but this does NOT mean Maxlife matches the OEM fluid exactly. Just look at the claimed approval list, which is dozens of different OEM specs. There is NO WAY one fluid can match the fluid of all those different OEM's.

Bottom line (repeating myself here): Maxlife may work fine, or it may not. I doubt it will cause anyone's transmission to "fail". It may not shift correctly under all conditions, though.

As they say: you pays your money, and you takes your chances. After experiencing poor shift performance using Maxlife, I won't use it again. Your experience may vary.
 
shows no Idemitsu DW-1 it shows H. All apples to oranges on the chart.
Idemitsu doesn't sell an ATF called "DW-1". You claim to have seen a barrel of it though....
Please explain who developed the chart? Did that come from Idemitsu?
I would like to hear their explanation, of those differences and what it means for sure.
People bought those fluids and sent them to a lab to have the composition analyzed.
Lets be honest, has anyone here seen the photo that I posted reference to? Yes or No?
Post it
 
I know a lot more now than I did when I started this thread a couple months ago. I've been all over the Internet, read at many Honda forums, watched many Youtube videos and read comments, and joined one of the Honda forums. I've also read a lot of data sheets.

It's likely that someone did see an oil barrel at a Honda dealership with the Idemitsu logo and/or name on it. Why is this an argument? It's not a problem.

Idemitsu makes the OEM Honda brand oils, including DW-1. A possible exception might be Honda motor oils used in USA market.

In the recent past, I downloaded from a Honda dealership the Honda safety data sheets for Honda PSF and Honda DW-1. Both have the Idemitsu name and logo at top left of the data sheet.

It's entirely possible (likely) that a big barrel of Honda brand DW-1 would have both the Idemitsu and Honda names and/or logos on it.

Whether the barrel seen at the dealership was Honda brand oil made by Idemitsu, or Idemitsu brand oil made by Idemitsu is irrelevant.

Honda DW-1 ATF is made by Idemitsu to the specs that Honda thinks best for use in Hondas. Idemitsu Type H Plus ATF is made by Idemitsu to the specs that Idemitsu thinks best for use in Hondas.

If your car manual specifies Honda DW-1 ATF, you could save money by using Idemitsu Type H Plus ATF, or Valvoline Extended Protection Full Syn ATF, or Maxlife Full Syn ATF.

Many people have used Idemitsu Type H Plus ATF, Valvoline EP FS ATF, and Maxlife Full Syn ATF in Hondas longterm. They report the following experiences with these ATF in their Hondas:

Idemitsu Type H Plus ATF shifts smoother than DW-1.
Valvoline Extended Protection Full Syn ATF shifts smoother than DW-1.
Maxlife Full Syn ATF shifts same as DW-1, but Maxlife is better for preventing or reducing leaks.

Just make sure you don't accidentally use Maxlife Blend ATF. The Blend version comes in a similar looking red bottle that looks similar to the Maxlife Full Syn ATF red bottle. So make sure you see the words Full Syn on the Maxlife bottle.

So if the dealership had a barrel of Honda DW-1 ATF with the word Idemitsu on it (in addition to word Honda) that is believeable and just fine. If the dealership had a barrel of Idemitsu Type H Plus ATF that is also believeable and would be even better.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but no. Valvoline may make their best attempt to match specs, those available to them, but this does NOT mean Maxlife matches the OEM fluid exactly.
"Recommended (Industrial, Marketing) – This lubricant is not licensed by an OEM for the recommended listed coverage, but the manufacturer or blender believes it is appropriate because of internal or external testing, or the listed coverage is supported by the additive manufacturer who has tested the DI formulation in actual hardware.

"Recommended for the Following" DOES NOT imply the exact same chemistry as the OEM chemistry, but what it does imply is the viscosity, dynamic friction (shifting) characteristics, and other performance items are commensurate with the OEM fluid."

Just look at the claimed approval list, which is dozens of different OEM specs. There is NO WAY one fluid can match the fluid of all those different OEM's.
Please explain why they cannot.
 
Back
Top Bottom